Literature DB >> 27131438

Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients Without ST-Segment Elevation Pattern: Insights From the PROCAT II Registry.

Florence Dumas1, Wulfran Bougouin2, Guillaume Geri2, Lionel Lamhaut3, Julien Rosencher4, Frédéric Pène5, Jean-Daniel Chiche5, Olivier Varenne4, Pierre Carli6, Xavier Jouven7, Jean-Paul Mira5, Christian Spaulding7, Alain Cariou2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In a large cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients without ST-segment elevation (STE), the study assessed the relationship between the use of an early invasive strategy and patient outcome.
BACKGROUND: Emergent coronary angiogram (CAG) and reperfusion are currently a standard of care in patients resuscitated from an OHCA with ST-segment elevation (STE). However, using a similar invasive strategy is still debated in patients without STE.
METHODS: In the absence of an obvious extracardiac cause, for many years our practice has had to perform an emergent CAG in all OHCA patients (STE and no STE) at admission, followed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when required. All patients' characteristics are prospectively collected in the PROCAT (Parisian Registry Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) database. Focusing on non-STE patients and using logistical regression, we investigated the association between early PCI and favorable outcome (cerebral performance category 1 to 2 at discharge) and we searched predictive factors for PCI requirement.
RESULTS: During the study period (2004 to 2013), we investigated 958 OHCA patients with an emergent CAG. Among them 695 of 958 (73%), mostly male (76%), and average 60 years of age had no evidence of STE on the post-resuscitation electrocardiography. A PCI was deemed necessary in 199 of 695 (29%). A favorable outcome was observed in 87 of 200 (43%) in patients with PCI compared with 164 of 495 (33%) in patients without PCI (p = 0.02). After adjustment, PCI was associated with a better outcome (adjusted odds ratio: 1.80 [95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 2.97]; p = 0.02). The other predictive factors of favorable outcome were a shorter resuscitation length (<20 min), an initial shockable rhythm, and a lower dose of epinephrine during resuscitation (p < 0.001). An initial shockable rhythm (adjusted odds ratio: 2.83 [95% confidence interval: 1.84 to 4.36]; p < 0.001) was the sole independent indicator for PCI requirement.
CONCLUSIONS: A culprit coronary lesion requiring PCI was found in nearly one-third of OHCA patients without STE. In these patients, emergent PCI was associated with a nearly 2-fold increase in the rate of favorable outcome. These findings support the use of an invasive strategy in these patients, particularly in those resuscitated from a shockable rhythm.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac arrest; coronary angiogram; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27131438     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  29 in total

Review 1.  Intensive care medicine research agenda on cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Robert A Berg; Stephen Bernard; Bentley J Bobrow; Clifton W Callaway; Tobias Cronberg; Rudolph W Koster; Peter J Kudenchuk; Graham Nichol; Gavin D Perkins; Tom D Rea; Claudio Sandroni; Jasmeet Soar; Kjetil Sunde; Alain Cariou
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Focus on cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Alain Cariou; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Anders Aneman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Association between survival and non-selective prehospital aspirin and heparin administration in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ulrich Grabmaier; Konstantinos D Rizas; Julius Berghof; York Huflaender; Christopher Wiegers; Reza Wakili; Michael Kaspar; Matthias Angstwurm; Steffen Massberg; Ludwig T Weckbach; Stefan Brunner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Selection bias, interventions and outcomes for survivors of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  David J Wallace; Patrick Coppler; Clifton Callaway; Jon C Rittenberger; Cameron Dezfulian; Deepika Mohan; Catalin Toma; Jonathan Elmer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Variation in outcomes among 24/7 percutaneous coronary intervention centres for patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Bryn E Mumma; Machelle D Wilson; María F García-Pintos; Pablo J Erramouspe; Daniel J Tancredi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 6.  Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Neil T Srinivasan; Richard J Schilling
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-06

7.  Epidemiology, Outcomes and Coronary Angiography Findings of Patients Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A single-centre experience from Oman.

Authors:  Sunil K Nadar; Mohammed Mujtaba; Hafidh Al-Hadi; Muhammed Sadiq; Adil Al-Riyami; Mehar Ali; Hatim Al-Lawati
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2018-09-09

8.  European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Claudio Sandroni; Bernd W Böttiger; Alain Cariou; Tobias Cronberg; Hans Friberg; Cornelia Genbrugge; Kirstie Haywood; Gisela Lilja; Véronique R M Moulaert; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Theresa Mariero Olasveengen; Markus B Skrifvars; Fabio Taccone; Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Enhancing cardiac arrest survival with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: insights into the process of death.

Authors:  Tom P Aufderheide; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Multivessel versus Culprit-Only Revascularization Strategies in Cardiac Arrest Survivors.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Chen; Min-Shan Tsai; Chien-Hua Huang; Chih-Wei Sung; Po-Ya Chuang; Chih-Hung Wang; Yen-Wen Wu; Wei-Tien Chang; Wen-Jone Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.