Literature DB >> 27131409

Biomechanical comparison of plate and screw fixation in anterior pelvic ring fractures with low bone mineral density.

Yves P Acklin1, Ivan Zderic2, Jan Buschbaum2, Peter Varga2, Jason A Inzana2, Stephan Grechenig3, R Geoff Richards2, Boyko Gueorguiev2, Paul Schmitz3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteosynthesis of anterior pubic ramus fractures can be challenging, especially in poor bone quality. The aim of the present study was to compare plate and retrograde endomedullary screw fixation of the superior pubic ramus with low bone mineral density (BMD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve human cadaveric hemi-pelvises were analyzed in a matched pair study design. BMD of the specimens was 35±30mgHA/cm(3), as measured in the fifth lumbar vertebra. A simulated two-fragment superior pubic ramus fracture model was fixed with either a 7.3-mm cannulated retrograde screw (Group 1) or a 10-hole 3.5-mm reconstruction plate (Group 2). Cyclic progressively increasing axial loading was applied through the acetabulum. Relative interfragmentary movements were captured using an optical motion tracking system.
RESULTS: Initial axial construct stiffness was 424±116.1N/mm in Group 1 and 464±69.7N/mm in Group 2, with no significant difference (p=0.345). Displacement and gap angle at the fracture site during cyclic loading were significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2. Cycles to failure, based on clinically relevant criteria, were significantly lower in Group 1 (3469±1837) compared to Group 2 (10,226±3295) (p=0.028). Failure mode in Group 1 was characterized by screw cutting through the cancellous bone. In Group 2 the specimens exclusively failed by plate bending.
CONCLUSIONS: From biomechanical point of view, pubic ramus stabilization with plate osteosynthesis is superior compared to a single retrograde screw fixation in osteoporotic bone. However, the extensive surgical approach needed for plating must be considered.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical testing; Pelvic fracture; Retrograde endomedullary screw fixation; Superior pubic ramus fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27131409     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

1.  Operative management of fragility fractures of the pelvis - a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel G G Wilson; Joshua Kelly; Mark Rickman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Are two retrograde 3.5 mm screws superior to one 7.3 mm screw for anterior pelvic ring fixation in bones with low bone mineral density?

Authors:  Y P Acklin; I Zderic; S Grechenig; R G Richards; P Schmitz; B Gueorguiev
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury-A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model.

Authors:  Fabian M Stuby; Mark Lenz; Stefan Doebele; Yash Agarwal; Hristo Skulev; Björn G Ochs; Jörn Zwingmann; Boyko Gueorguiev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Numerical Investigation on the Biomechanical Performance of Laparoscopic-Assisted Plate Used for Fixing Pelvic Anterior Ring Fracture.

Authors:  Yiqian He; Yongtao Lu; Baosheng Yin; Li Yu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Anterior subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) versus plate fixation for pelvic anterior ring fracture.

Authors:  Yingchao Yin; Junhao Luo; Ruipeng Zhang; Shilun Li; Zhenqing Jiao; Yingze Zhang; Zhiyong Hou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Intramedullary Stabilization of Pubic Ramus Fractures in Elderly Patients With a Photodynamic Bone Stabilization System (IlluminOss).

Authors:  Stavros Oikonomidis; Ahmad Alabsi; Ghazi Ashqar; Markus Graf; Rolf Sobottke
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-04-25

7.  Comparison of Biomechanical Performance of Five Different Treatment Approaches for Fixing Posterior Pelvic Ring Injury.

Authors:  Yongtao Lu; Yiqian He; Weiteng Li; Zhuoyue Yang; Ruifei Peng; Li Yu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 8.  Biomechanics of Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Marianne Hollensteiner; Sabrina Sandriesser; Emily Bliven; Christian von Rüden; Peter Augat
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Plate fixation of the anterior pelvic ring in patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Michiel Herteleer; Mehdi Boudissa; Alexander Hofmann; Daniel Wagner; Pol Maria Rommens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.374

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.