Literature DB >> 27130980

Bacterial and viral co-infections complicating severe influenza: Incidence and impact among 507 U.S. patients, 2013-14.

Nirav S Shah1, Jared A Greenberg2, Moira C McNulty2, Kevin S Gregg3, James Riddell3, Julie E Mangino4, Devin M Weber4, Courtney L Hebert5, Natalie S Marzec6, Michelle A Barron7, Fredy Chaparro-Rojas8, Alejandro Restrepo9, Vagish Hemmige9, Kunatum Prasidthrathsint10, Sandra Cobb10, Loreen Herwaldt10, Vanessa Raabe11, Christopher R Cannavino11, Andrea Green Hines12, Sara H Bares12, Philip B Antiporta13, Tonya Scardina14, Ursula Patel15, Gail Reid13, Parvin Mohazabnia16, Suresh Kachhdiya16, Binh-Minh Le16, Connie J Park17, Belinda Ostrowsky17, Ari Robicsek18, Becky A Smith19, Jeanmarie Schied20, Micah M Bhatti20, Stockton Mayer21, Monica Sikka21, Ivette Murphy-Aguilu21, Priti Patwari22, Shira R Abeles23, Francesca J Torriani23, Zainab Abbas24, Sophie Toya24, Katherine Doktor25, Anindita Chakrabarti25, Susanne Doblecki-Lewis25, David J Looney26, Michael Z David27.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Influenza acts synergistically with bacterial co-pathogens. Few studies have described co-infection in a large cohort with severe influenza infection.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the spectrum and clinical impact of co-infections. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients with severe influenza infection from September 2013 through April 2014 in intensive care units at 33 U.S. hospitals comparing characteristics of cases with and without co-infection in bivariable and multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: Of 507 adult and pediatric patients, 114 (22.5%) developed bacterial co-infection and 23 (4.5%) developed viral co-infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common cause of co-infection, isolated in 47 (9.3%) patients. Characteristics independently associated with the development of bacterial co-infection of adult patients in a logistic regression model included the absence of cardiovascular disease (OR 0.41 [0.23-0.73], p=0.003), leukocytosis (>11K/μl, OR 3.7 [2.2-6.2], p<0.001; reference: normal WBC 3.5-11K/μl) at ICU admission and a higher ICU admission SOFA score (for each increase by 1 in SOFA score, OR 1.1 [1.0-1.2], p=0.001). Bacterial co-infections (OR 2.2 [1.4-3.6], p=0.001) and viral co-infections (OR 3.1 [1.3-7.4], p=0.010) were both associated with death in bivariable analysis. Patients with a bacterial co-infection had a longer hospital stay, a longer ICU stay and were likely to have had a greater delay in the initiation of antiviral administration than patients without co-infection (p<0.05) in bivariable analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial co-infections were common, resulted in delay of antiviral therapy and were associated with increased resource allocation and higher mortality.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-infection; ICU; Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09; MRSA; Severe influenza; Staphylococcus aureus

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27130980      PMCID: PMC7185824          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


Background

Influenza results in significant morbidity and mortality in the U.S and worldwide [1], and this is exacerbated by bacterial co-infections during both seasonal and pandemic influenza years [2], [3], [4]. During the most severe influenza pandemic recorded, in 1918–1919, when an estimated 675,000 people died in the United States [5], [6], epidemiologic, clinical and pathologic data indicate that the majority of influenza patients died from bacterial pneumonia rather than from the influenza virus itself. Bacterial co-infections should thus be studied in order to devise effective preventative and therapeutic strategies [2], [3], [7]. Influenza virus has been shown to have complex effects on the human lung, priming the respiratory tract for synergistic pathogenesis with a bacterial co-infection [8]. Morbidity and mortality are increased when bacterial pneumonia complicates influenza infection as compared with bacterial pneumonia in the absence of influenza infection [9], [10]. During the 1918 and 1968–1969 pandemics, Streptococcus pneumoniae was likely the most common co-pathogen [3], [11]. In the 1957–1958 pandemic, many reports identified Staphylococcus aureus as the most frequently cultured co-pathogen [3], [12], [13]. More recently S. aureus has been increasingly found in cases of fulminant pneumonia complicating influenza infection [14], [15]. Haemophilus influenzae, with the introduction of the H. influenzae type B conjugate vaccine in 1985 [16], and Streptococcus pyogenes have decreased in prevalence over time [17]. Vaccination, novel antibiotics, and probably more importantly, viral or bacterial strain-related differences account for shifts in etiology of the most common bacterial co-infections [8]. A novel pandemic influenza A strain, influenza A (H1N1) pdm09, emerged in 2009. Reported rates of bacterial co-infection among severely ill patients varied between 17.5% and 25% for community-acquired influenza patients in the 2009–2010 season [18], [19] and 33% in a study of combined community-acquired and hospital-acquired influenza patients [20]. In these and other studies the most common community-acquired pathogens included S. pneumoniae and then S. aureus [10]. The risk of co-infection and spectrum of bacterial species has not been studied during the 2013–2014 season, the first postpandemic year in which influenza A (H1N1) pdm was the predominant circulating influenza strain.

Objectives

We recently completed a retrospective study of 507 patients with severe influenza treated in intensive care units (ICUs) of 33 U.S. hospitals during the 2013–2014 influenza season [21]. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate bacterial and viral co-infection in this cohort, to describe the spectrum of co-infections and to determine their clinical impact.

Study design

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with laboratory confirmed influenza A and/or influenza B infection who were diagnosed with influenza during an ICU stay or within 30 days prior to an ICU admission between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014 at 33 U.S. study sites that made up the Severe H1N1 Influenza Consortium (SHIC) [21]. Laboratory testing may have been with a PCR-based test, a rapid test or viral culture. Complete laboratory data were accessed from infection control records, an enterprise data warehouse or directly from the clinical microbiology laboratory. Institutional review boards approved the study at each of the participating sites.

Data collected

Data for this study were abstracted by a physician from each center’s electronic health record (EHR) and entered into a REDCap database [22]. Data abstracted and study site information were previously described [21]. Bacterial co-infection was defined in patients having one or more isolates obtained from a blood culture and/or a pleural fluid, sputum, tracheal or bronchoscopic sample if the isolate was a pathogen thought to be causing a true infection in the opinion of the treating physician and if the isolate was collected within 30 days of ICU admission or present on arrival to the ICU. Viral co-infection was defined in patients having a positive PCR or appropriate antibody test for a viral pathogen other than influenza. Bacterial co-infections cultured within 48 h of hospital admission were defined as community-acquired; those cultured after 48 h were considered to be hospital-acquired. Bacterial identification and susceptibility testing were performed by methods determined by institutional guidelines. For all patients, management was according to institutional practices.

Statistical analysis

STATA v12 (College Station, TX: StataCorp LP) was used for all analyses. Outliers were reexamined in the EHR to ensure data accuracy. No subject with outlying values was excluded from any analysis. Descriptive statistics were tabulated. Bivariable analyses were used to compare potential risk factors for bacterial co-infection diagnosed during the 30 days after ICU admission or present on admission. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to determine which of the variables significantly associated in bivariable analyses (p < 0.05) were independently associated with co-infection. Further multivariable analysis was used to predict risk of death among co-infected patients and also to assess resource utilization accounting for admission SOFA score.

Results

Five hundred and seven patients with severe influenza were admitted to ICUs at one of the 33 U.S. hospitals participating in the SHIC study in 2013–2014. In this cohort influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 caused 311 (61.3%) infections, and influenza A virus that were not subtyped caused 170 (33.5%) additional infections. Other influenza strains caused 5.2% of infections (Table 1 ).
Table 1

Characteristics of 507 patients with severe influenza infection in the U.S. diagnosed between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014, comparing adult and pediatric patients.

CharacteristicsaAdults (N = 444) No. (%)Children (N = 63) No. (%)
SexFemale223 (50.2)28 (44.4)
Age group0–4 yr39 (61.9)
5–9 yr10 (2.0)
10–17 yr14 (2.8)
18–49 yr156 (30.8)
50–64 yr185 (36.5)
≥65 yr103 (20.3)



Influenza type and subtypeA—H1N1 pdm2009274 (61.7)37 (58.7)
A—subtype not specified150 (33.8)20 (31.7)
A—H1 subtype not pdm20096 (1.4)2 (3.2)
A—H33 (0.7)2 (3.2)
B11 (2.5)2 (3.2)



Initial influenza diagnostic test (N = 506)Polymerase chain reaction369 (83.1)38/62 (61.3)
Rapid influenza test61 (13.7)18/62 (29.0)
Viral culture7 (1.6)0 (0)
Other7 (1.6)6/62 (9.7)



Influenza vaccineReceived 2013–14 vaccine (N = 258)108/210 (51.4)18/48 (37.5)



Respiratory bacterial co-infectionInfection at any point during hospitalization103 (23.2)11 (17.5)
Infection cultured within 48 h of hospital admission56 (12.6)6 (9.5)
Infection cultured greater than 48 h after hospital admission47 (10.6)5 (7.9)



Respiratory viral co-infectionInfection at any point during hospitalization13 (2.9)10 (15.9)



AntibacterialsReceived antibiotics418 (94.1)49 (77.8)
Placed on empiric Community-Acquired Pneumonia therapyb146 (32.9)10 (15.9)
Placed on empiric Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia therapyc219 (49.3)9 (14.3)



AntiviralsReceived after symptom onset421 (94.8)57 (90.5)
Initiated ≤48 h after symptom onset (N = 474)110/417 (26.4)32/57 (56.1)



Died93 (20.9)4 (6.4)

When there are missing data for a specific variable, the n for subjects with data on this variable is indicated in the far left column.

Defined as either a respiratory fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin or moxifloxacin) or a combination of a broad-spectrum beta-lactam drug (ceftriaxone, cefepime, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems) and azithromycin.

Defined as combination therapy targeting methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), which includes vancomycin or linezolid, and a second agent targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which includes piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, carbapenems (with the exception of ertapenem), aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and colistin.

Characteristics of 507 patients with severe influenza infection in the U.S. diagnosed between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014, comparing adult and pediatric patients. When there are missing data for a specific variable, the n for subjects with data on this variable is indicated in the far left column. Defined as either a respiratory fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin or moxifloxacin) or a combination of a broad-spectrum beta-lactam drug (ceftriaxone, cefepime, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems) and azithromycin. Defined as combination therapy targeting methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), which includes vancomycin or linezolid, and a second agent targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which includes piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, carbapenems (with the exception of ertapenem), aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and colistin. There were 444 adult and 63 pediatric subjects. Baseline characteristics are displayed in Table 1. Bacterial co-infection was present in 114 (22.5%) subjects, comprising 23.2% of adult and 17.5% of pediatric subjects. Sixty two (12.2%) subjects developed community-acquired bacterial co-infection and 52 (10.3%) subjects developed hospital-acquired bacterial co-infection. Of the patients who developed community-acquired and hospital-acquired bacterial co-infections, 15/62 (24.2%) and 14/52 (26.9%), respectively, had no significant comorbid conditions. There were 129 total bacterial isolates cultured from the 507 patients in our cohort (Table 2 ), including 26 (20.2%) methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 21 (16.3%) methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 20 (15.5%) Enterobacteriaceae species, 18 (14.0%) Pseudomonas species, 7 (5.4%) S. pneumoniae and 37 (28.7%) other species (Table 2). S. aureus susceptibilities are displayed in Fig. 1 . Of the MRSA isolates, all were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 96.2% to tetracycline, 56% to clindamycin and 20.8% to erythromycin.
Table 2

Bacterial co-pathogens among 507 patients with severe influenza infection in the U.S. diagnosed between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014 by source of isolate.

Bacterial co-pathogenFrequency; N (%)Blood isolates; N (%)Sputum isolates; N (%)Blood and Sputum isolates; N (%)
Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus26 (20.2)3 (11.5)18 (69.2)5 (19.2)
Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus21 (16.3)3 (14.3)17 (81.0)1 (4.8)
Enterobacteriaceae20 (15.5)2 (10.0)17 (85.0)1 (5.0)
Pseudomonas sp.18 (14.0)2 (11.1)16 (88.9)
Streptococcus pneumoniae7 (5.4)4 (57.1)2 (28.6)1 (14.3)
Enterococcus sp.5 (3.9)5 (100)
Acinetobacter baumannii4 (3.1)4 (100)
Moraxella catarrhalis4 (3.1)4 (100)
Viridans streptococci4 (3.1)4 (100)
Haemophilus influenzae3 (2.3)3 (100)
Coagulase-negative staphylococci3 (2.3)3 (100)
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia3 (2.3)3 (100)
β-hemolytic streptococci (Not Group A or B)2 (1.6)1 (50)1 (50)
Burkholderia sp.2 (1.6)2 (100)
Corynebacterium sp.2 (1.6)2 (100)
Streptococcus pyogenes2 (1.6)1 (50)1 (50)
Bordetella bronchiseptica1 (0.8)1 (100)
Sphingomonas paucimobilis1 (0.8)1 (100)
Streptococcus agalactiae1 (0.8)1 (100)

Specific bacterial species not listed include Escherichia coli (N = 7), Enterobacter cloacae (N = 3), Klebsiella pneumoniae (N = 5), Klebsiella oxytoca (N = 1), Serratia marcescens (N = 1), Citrobacter freundii (N = 1), Enterobacter gergoviae (N = 1), Proteus mirabilis (N = 1), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (N = 17), Pseudomonas fluorescens (N = 1), Enterococcus faecium (N = 3), Enterococcus faecalis (N = 2), Streptococcus mitis (N = 2), Streptococcus parasanguinis (N = 1), Streptococcus salivarius (N = 1), Staphylococcus epidermidis (N = 3) and Corynebacterium striatum (N = 1).

Fig. 1

Antibiogram of Staphylococcus aureus isolates (n = 47) from co-infections, showing the percent that were resistant or intermediate to selected antibacterial drugs from 47 patients with severe influenza in the U.S. between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014.

Bacterial co-pathogens among 507 patients with severe influenza infection in the U.S. diagnosed between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014 by source of isolate. Specific bacterial species not listed include Escherichia coli (N = 7), Enterobacter cloacae (N = 3), Klebsiella pneumoniae (N = 5), Klebsiella oxytoca (N = 1), Serratia marcescens (N = 1), Citrobacter freundii (N = 1), Enterobacter gergoviae (N = 1), Proteus mirabilis (N = 1), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (N = 17), Pseudomonas fluorescens (N = 1), Enterococcus faecium (N = 3), Enterococcus faecalis (N = 2), Streptococcus mitis (N = 2), Streptococcus parasanguinis (N = 1), Streptococcus salivarius (N = 1), Staphylococcus epidermidis (N = 3) and Corynebacterium striatum (N = 1). Antibiogram of Staphylococcus aureus isolates (n = 47) from co-infections, showing the percent that were resistant or intermediate to selected antibacterial drugs from 47 patients with severe influenza in the U.S. between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014. S. aureus was the most prevalent species among both community- (43.7%) and hospital-acquired (27.6%) pathogens (Table 3 and Fig. 2 ). The prevalence of S. aureus was lower among hospital-acquired co-infections as compared with community-acquired co-infections. In contrast, the prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas sp. was higher among hospital-acquired bacterial co-infections (19.0% and 19.0%, respectively) as compared to community-acquired bacterial co-infections (12.7% and 9.9%, respectively). S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae and S. pyogenes were not isolated among hospital-acquired pathogens but were present among community-acquired co-infections (9.9%, 4.2%, and 2.8%), respectively.
Table 3

Bacterial co-pathogens among 507 adult and pediatric patients with severe influenza infection in the U.S. diagnosed between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014 by site at acquisition (community or hospital acquired) and presence or absence of respiratory comorbidities.

Age GroupCo-PathogenCommunity acquired
Hospital acquired
Presence of respiratory comorbidities; N (%)Absence of respiratory comorbidities; N (%)Presence of respiratory comorbidities; N (%)Absence of respiratory comorbidities; N (%)
Adults (N = 117)Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus5/28 (17.8)11/38 (28.9)3/23 (13.0)5/28 (17.9)
Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus6/28 (21.4)6/38 (15.8)2/23 (8.7)4/28 (14.3)
Enterobacteriaceae5/28 (17.9)4/38 (10.5)5/23 (21.7)5/28 (17.9)
Pseudomonas sp.4/28 (14.3)3/38 (7.9)6/23 (26.1)3/28 (10.7)
Streptococcus pneumoniae5/38 (13.2)
Enterococcus sp.1/38 (2.6)1/23 (4.3)2/28 (7.1)
Acinetobacter baumannii1/38 (2.6)1/23 (4.3)2/28 (7.1)
Moraxella catarrhalis2/28 (7.1)1/38 (2.6)
Viridans streptococci1/38 (2.6)2/23 (8.7)1/28 (3.6)
Haemophilus influenzae2/28 (7.1)1/38 (2.6)
Coagulase-negative staphylococci1/28 (3.6)2/28 (7.1)
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia3/23 (13.0)
β-hemolytic streptococci (Not Group A or B)2/38 (5.3)
Burkholderia sp.2/28 (7.1)
Corynebacterium sp.1/28 (3.6)1/38 (2.6)
Streptococcus pyogenes1/28 (3.6)1/38 (2.6)
Bordetella bronchiseptica1/28 (3.6)
Sphingomonas paucimobilis1/28 (3.6)
Streptococcus agalactiae1/28 (3.6)



Children (N = 12)Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus1/4 (25.0)1/6 (16.7)
Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus1/1 (100.0)1/4 (25.0)1/6 (16.7)
Enterobacteriaceae1/6 (16.7)
Pseudomonas sp.1/1 (100.0)1/6 (16.7)
Streptococcus pneumoniae2/4 (50.0)
Enterococcus sp.1/6 (16.7)
Moraxella catarrhalis1/6 (16.7)
Fig. 2

Percentage of community-acquired and hospital-acquired co-infections attributed to Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas sp. among 507 patients with severe influenza in the U.S. between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014.

Bacterial co-pathogens among 507 adult and pediatric patients with severe influenza infection in the U.S. diagnosed between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014 by site at acquisition (community or hospital acquired) and presence or absence of respiratory comorbidities. Percentage of community-acquired and hospital-acquired co-infections attributed to Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas sp. among 507 patients with severe influenza in the U.S. between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014. Patient characteristics associated with development of bacterial co-infection among adults (>17 years of age) in bivariable analyses are shown in Table 4 . The number of children in our cohort who developed a bacterial co-infection was too small to assess for risk factors for co-infection. Characteristics independently associated with the development of bacterial co-infection in adults included absence of cardiovascular disease (OR 0.41 [0.23–0.73], p = 0.003), leukocytosis at ICU admission (>11 K/μl, OR 3.7 [2.2–6.2], p < 0.001; reference: normal WBC 3.5–11 K/μl) and elevated SOFA score at ICU admission (for each increase by 1 in SOFA score, OR 1.1 [1.0–1.2], p = 0.001).
Table 4

Patient characteristics associated with bacterial co-infection among 444 adult patients with severe influenza infection in the U.S. between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014: Results of bivariable analyses and a multivariable logistic regression model.a

CharacteristicbNot co-infected; N = 341 (%)Co-infected; N = 103 (%)Univariable; P valueMultivariable; odds ratio (95% CI), P value
Age, years18–49117 (34.3)39 (39)0.690
50–64142 (41.6)43 (41.8)
>6582 (24.1)21 (20.4)



SexFemale171 (50.2)52 (50.5)0.952
Male170 (49.9)51 (49.5)



Race (N = 393)White184/298 (61.7)58/95 (61.1)0.404
Black92/298 (30.9)26/95 (27.4)
Other22/298 (7.4)11/95 (11.6)



Ethnicity(N = 403)Hispanic43/308 (14.0)14/95 (14.7)0.850
Not Hispanic265/308 (86.0)81/95 (85.3)



Body mass index, kg/m2 (N = 439)>30182/339 (53.7)51/100 (51.0)0.891
30–39 (obese)108/339 (31.9)34/100 (34.0)
≥40 (morbidly obese)49/339 (14.5)15/100 (15.0)



Admission to a hospital or SNF/LTEC stay in the prior yearYes117 (34.3)33 (32.0)0.251
No133 (39.0)34 (33.0)
Unknown91 (26.7)36 (35.0)



ComorbiditiesAsthma64 (18.8)17 (16.5)0.602
COPD or other chronic lung disease (N = 443)81/340 (23.8)25 (24.3)0.914
Cardiovascular disease110 (31.4)19 (18.5)0.0070.41 (0.23–0.73), 0.003
Diabetes mellitus108 (31.7)31 (30.1)0.763
Chronic kidney disease60 (17.6)12 (11.7)0.151
Liver disease20 (5.9)9 (8.7)0.301
Malignancy, received chemotherapy in past 6 mo19 (5.6)8 (7.8)0.414
HIV infection8 (2.3)1 (1.0)0.385
Dementia11 (3.2)3 (2.9)0.873
Other neurologic diseases38 (11.1)11 (10.7)0.895
History of transplant31 (9.1)5 (4.9)0.167
Received steroid within the past month21 (6.2)11 (10.7)0.120
Received biologics within the past month (N = 443)8/340 (2.4)1 (1.0)0.391
FTT or malnutrition (N = 443)13/340 (3.8)5 (4.9)0.642
Current smoker (N = 442)107 (31.4)24/101 (23.8)0.141



White blood cell count on admission to ICU, K/uL (N = 443)>11 (Leukocytosis)102/340 (30.0)52 (50.5)<0.00013.7 (2.2–6.2),<0.001
3.5–11 (Normal)211/340 (62.1)36 (35.0)Reference
<3.5 (Leukopenia)27/340 (7.9)15 (14.6)2.0 (0.94–4.4), 0.070



SOFA score on admission to ICU; mean (sd) (N = 440)c7.5 (4.3)9.3 (4.2)0.00011.1 (1.0–1.2), 0.001



Initial chest X-ray quadrants with infiltrated≥2172 (50.4)61 (59.2)0.118

Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; SNF, skilled nursing facility; LTEC, long-term extended care facility; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; FTT, failure to thrive; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; ICU, Intensive Care Unit; sd, standard deviation.

The multivariable analysis included all variables with p < 0.05 in the bivariable analysis.

When there are missing data for a specific variable, the n for subjects with data on this variable is indicated in the far left column.

SOFA score is determined by the following laboratory or clinical criteria: PaO2/FiO2; Glasgow coma scale; mean arterial pressure or requiring administration of vasopressor; bilirubin; platelet count; creatinine or urine output.

Determined by data abstracter by visual review of chest X-ray.

Patient characteristics associated with bacterial co-infection among 444 adult patients with severe influenza infection in the U.S. between September 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014: Results of bivariable analyses and a multivariable logistic regression model.a Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; SNF, skilled nursing facility; LTEC, long-term extended care facility; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; FTT, failure to thrive; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; ICU, Intensive Care Unit; sd, standard deviation. The multivariable analysis included all variables with p < 0.05 in the bivariable analysis. When there are missing data for a specific variable, the n for subjects with data on this variable is indicated in the far left column. SOFA score is determined by the following laboratory or clinical criteria: PaO2/FiO2; Glasgow coma scale; mean arterial pressure or requiring administration of vasopressor; bilirubin; platelet count; creatinine or urine output. Determined by data abstracter by visual review of chest X-ray. Of the patients co-infected with a bacterial pathogen, 34 (29.8%) died, and of the patients not co-infected with a bacterial pathogen, 63 (16.0%) died. Bacterial co-infected patients were significantly more likely to die (OR 2.2 [1.4–3.6], p = 0.001) than patients not co-infected with a bacterial pathogen in univariable analysis. When controlling for disease severity by the SOFA score, patients co-infected were still more likely to die (OR 1.8 [1.1–3.1], p = 0.024). Patients co-infected with S. aureus were not more likely to die than patients with other bacterial co-infections in univariable analysis (OR 1.1 [0.49–2.5], p = 0.8) or when controlling for SOFA score (OR 1.1 [0.5–2.7], p = 0.75). Patients who had a bacterial co-infection had a longer hospital stay (26.5 days vs 13.6 days; p < 0.0001), had a longer ICU stay (14.6 days vs 7.9 days; p = 0.003) and had a greater delay in the initiation of administration of an antiviral (6.9 days vs 5.3 days; p = 0.02) than patients without bacterial co-infection. Each of these last three outcomes were not significant, however, when controlling for the admission SOFA score. Autopsy data, available for only 12 subjects, revealed that four (25%) had bacterial superinfection, of whom three had known bacterial co-infection from cultures obtained prior to death (all with S. aureus). One did not have a causative organism cultured. Viral respiratory co-infections were identified in 23/507 (4.5%) of patients. The viral pathogens included 8/23 (34.8%) rhinovirus/enterovirus, 4/23 (17.4%) respiratory syncytial virus, 3/23 (13.0%) each adenovirus, coronavirus and parainfluenza virus and 2/23 (8.7%) human metapneumovirus. Patients with viral co-infection were more likely to have leukemia (p = 0.004), lymphoma or myeloma (p < 0.001), a history of transplantation (p < 0.001) and to have received chemotherapy in the previous six months (p = 0.007) in bivariable analysis. Nine (39.1%) patients with viral co-infection died. Patients with a viral co-infection were significantly more likely to die (OR 3.1 [1.3–7.4], p = 0.010) than patients without a viral co-infection in bivariable analysis. When controlling for underlying comorbidities of leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma and transplantation, patients with viral co-infection were not significantly more likely to die (OR 0.78 [−0.13 to 1.7], p = 0.094).

Discussion

In patients with severe influenza infection during 2013–2014, the first postpandemic season in the U.S. in which influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 was the predominant circulating influenza strain, respiratory co-infections were common, were associated with higher mortality. They resulted in increased resource allocation, as defined by longer hospital and ICU stay, although this was not significant when accounting for admission SOFA score. In this study of 507 patients with severe influenza, 22.5% had bacterial co-infection and 4.5% had viral co-infection. Of the 99 patients who died, more than one-third had a bacterial co-infection. S. aureus was the most prevalent species causing respiratory bacterial co-infection, and MRSA was the most common community-acquired pathogen. This supports the idea that S. aureus has a synergistic relationship with influenza A (H1N1) pdm09, even for people in the community. Patients with bacterial co-infection were less likely to have cardiovascular disease, were more likely to have leukocytosis on ICU admission and tended to have a higher ICU admission SOFA score. In our cohort, among the 22.5% of patients with a bacterial co-infection, 12.2% had community-acquired and 10.3% had hospital-acquired co-infections. Our rates were lower than those reported in the 2009–2010 season. During that pandemic year, rates of 17.5–25% for community-acquired co-infections and 33% for combined community- and hospital-acquired co-infections were reported although the criteria for defining a co-infected patient varied by study [18], [19], [20]. Four (25%) out of 12 autopsies in our cohort showed evidence of bacterial pneumonia, but one of these four patients did not have a positive culture despite collection of respiratory and blood cultures. Our recorded 30-day incidence of bacterial co-infection may therefore be an underestimate, reflecting the poor sensitivity of lower respiratory cultures in the setting of empiric antimicrobial therapy. Bacterial co-infection was associated with higher mortality. This is despite the fact that 92.1% of our cohort received antibacterial drugs during hospitalization. The pathogenesis of influenza and bacterial co-infection is synergistic and complex. The disease process involves numerous viral and bacterial virulence factors interacting with the host immune system and adversely affecting respiratory physiology. In pandemic seasons, compared with usual epidemic seasons, a high proportion of the mortality from influenza infection, often complicated by bacterial co-infection, occurs in young, previously healthy people as a result of an aberrant immune response to the virus [23]. S. aureus was the most common species isolated in our cohort. In a 2009 study on co-infections in severely ill patients with influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 infection in 35 U.S. ICUs, S. aureus was also found to be the most common bacterial pathogen [10]. S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae and S. pyogenes were all also present among community-acquired pathogens but surprisingly, P. aeruginosa was more common than any of these species. P. aeruginosa is increasingly being described as a co-pathogen with influenza [24]. As expected, we recorded a high prevalence of Gram negative co-infections among hospital-acquired infections. In our cohort 31.3% of hospital-acquired co-infections were due to S. aureus and 19.4% were due to each Pseudomonas species and Enterobacteriaceae. In studies evaluating the agents of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia without an underlying influenza infection, 14–28% have been attributed to S. aureus, 16–34% have been attributed to P. aeruginosa and 19–35% have been attributed to Enterobacteriaceae [25]. The prevalence of S. aureus among hospital-acquired bacterial co-infections in our cohort was slightly higher than what would be expected in patients without influenza infection. Co-infection resulted in greater resource allocation as measured by hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay in bivariable but not multivariable analysis. Moreover, time from symptom onset to administration of an antiviral effective against influenza was delayed in co-infected patients in bivariable but not multivariable analysis. A number of studies have shown an association between early effective antiviral use in influenza infection and reduced ICU admission and mortality, suggesting that the delay in our cohort may have been detrimental [26]. Risk factors for bacterial co-infection included lack of cardiovascular disease as well as leukocytosis and increased SOFA score on ICU admission. It is unclear why cardiovascular disease appeared to be protective in our cohort; it may be that statin use confers anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects that may reduce risk of co-infection. This possible association warrants further study. Viral co-infection was associated with increased mortality in our cohort in bivariable but not in multivariable analysis when controlling for underlying comorbidities. Studies evaluating this previously have been mixed [27], [28], [29]. The association between viral co-infection and mortality require further research. Our study had several limitations. The majority of subjects were treated at U.S. tertiary care centers; thus, our findings may not be generalizable to any population of severely ill influenza patients. We did not include subjects admitted after April 1, 2014. Therefore, we did not include the final part of the influenza season, likely excluding disproportionately patients with severe influenza B infection, who may experience a different risk of bacterial and viral co-infection from influenza A (H1N1) pdm 09 patients. Management of patients and bacterial identification and susceptibility testing was not standardized. Rapid diagnostic testing may have resulted in some missed cases of influenza among ICU patients. However, this was the sole method used in only 3 of 33 studied hospitals. While we used a standardized data collection form, some variables were not available for some subjects. Finally, as a retrospective study, selection bias and immortal time bias may have affected our choice of subjects and our analysis, respectively. This study highlights the importance of bacterial co-infection in the pathogenesis of severe influenza infection. Preventive measures to address co-infection include ensuring high rates of influenza, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae vaccination, appropriate timing of antivirals and early and appropriate antibiotic therapy targeting MRSA and Pseudomonas. Therapy targeting MRSA particularly in cases of community-acquired pneumonia is important. Understanding the complex and synergistic relationship between bacteria and influenza is vital in decreasing mortality in future seasonal and pandemic influenza seasons.

Competing interests

None.

Funding

This publication was made possible in part by Grant Number D33HP25768 from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).

Ethical approval

IRB approval received from UofC (IRB 14-0383) and each participating hospital.
  29 in total

1.  Factors associated with severe disease in hospitalized adults with pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in Spain.

Authors:  D Viasus; J R Paño-Pardo; J Pachón; A Campins; F López-Medrano; A Villoslada; M C Fariñas; A Moreno; J Rodríguez-Baño; J A Oteo; J Martínez-Montauti; J Torre-Cisneros; F Segura; F Gudiol; J Carratalà
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 2.  Microbial etiologies of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Pulmonary complications of interpandemic influenza A in hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Murata; Edward E Walsh; Ann R Falsey
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus infection with respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Nicolás Nin; Luis Soto; Javier Hurtado; José A Lorente; María Buroni; Francisco Arancibia; Sebastian Ugarte; Homero Bagnulo; Pablo Cardinal; Guillermo Bugedo; Estrella Echevarría; Alberto Deicas; Carlos Ortega; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Andrés Esteban
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  Rapid detection of respiratory tract viral infections and coinfections in patients with influenza-like illnesses by use of reverse transcription-PCR DNA microarray systems.

Authors:  Fanny Renois; Déborah Talmud; Antoine Huguenin; Lauryane Moutte; Christophe Strady; Joel Cousson; Nicolas Lévêque; Laurent Andréoletti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Pandemic 2009 influenza A in Argentina: a study of 337 patients on mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Elisa Estenssoro; Fernando G Ríos; Carlos Apezteguía; Rosa Reina; Jorge Neira; Daniel H Ceraso; Cristina Orlandi; Ricardo Valentini; Norberto Tiribelli; Matías Brizuela; Carina Balasini; Sebastián Mare; Gustavo Domeniconi; Santiago Ilutovich; Alejandro Gómez; Javiera Giuliani; Cecilia Barrios; Pascual Valdez
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 8.  Burden of disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b in children younger than 5 years: global estimates.

Authors:  James P Watt; Lara J Wolfson; Katherine L O'Brien; Emily Henkle; Maria Deloria-Knoll; Natalie McCall; Ellen Lee; Orin S Levine; Rana Hajjeh; Kim Mulholland; Thomas Cherian
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Disease severity in patients with simultaneous influenza and bacterial pneumonia.

Authors:  Masafumi Seki; Kosuke Kosai; Katsunori Yanagihara; Yasuhito Higashiyama; Shintaro Kurihara; Koichi Izumikawa; Yoshitsugu Miyazaki; Yoichi Hirakata; Takayoshi Tashiro; Shigeru Kohno
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 1.271

10.  Bacterial co-infection with H1N1 infection in patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Catia Cillóniz; Santiago Ewig; Rosario Menéndez; Miquel Ferrer; Eva Polverino; Soledad Reyes; Albert Gabarrús; Maria Angeles Marcos; Juan Cordoba; Josep Mensa; Antoni Torres
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 6.072

View more
  33 in total

1.  Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel for Detection of Viral and Bacterial Pathogens in Lower Respiratory Tract Specimens in the Setting of a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Daniel M Webber; Meghan A Wallace; C A Burnham; Neil W Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Monocytes Represent One Source of Bacterial Shielding from Antibiotics following Influenza Virus Infection.

Authors:  Karl J Fischer; Vijaya Kumar Yajjala; Shruti Bansal; Christopher Bauer; Ruiling Chen; Keer Sun
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 3.  Host-Pathogen Interactions in Gram-Positive Bacterial Pneumonia.

Authors:  Jennifer A Grousd; Helen E Rich; John F Alcorn
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Contributions of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin and Host Immune Responses Toward the Severity of Influenza Virus: Streptococcus pyogenes Superinfections.

Authors:  Joshua M Klonoski; Trevor Watson; Thomas E Bickett; Joshua M Svendsen; Tonia J Gau; Alexandra Britt; Jeff T Nelson; Evelyn H Schlenker; Michael S Chaussee; Agnieszka Rynda-Apple; Victor C Huber
Journal:  Viral Immunol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.257

5.  Anti-influenza Activity of a Bacillus subtilis Probiotic Strain.

Authors:  Darya Starosila; Svetlana Rybalko; Ludmila Varbanetz; Naila Ivanskaya; Iryna Sorokulova
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  The pro-inflammatory effect of Staphylokinase contributes to community-associated Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

Authors:  Yanan Wang; Na Zhao; Ying Jian; Yao Liu; Lin Zhao; Lei He; Qian Liu; Min Li
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-06-23

7.  Bacterial Pneumonia and Respiratory Culture Utilization among Hospitalized Patients with and without COVID-19 in a New York City Hospital.

Authors:  Maxwell D Weidmann; Gregory J Berry; Jason E Zucker; Simian Huang; Magdalena E Sobieszczyk; Daniel A Green
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 11.677

8.  Outcomes of respiratory viral-bacterial co-infection in adult hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Yingzhi Liu; Lowell Ling; Sunny H Wong; Maggie Ht Wang; J Ross Fitzgerald; Xuan Zou; Shisong Fang; Xiaodong Liu; Xiansong Wang; Wei Hu; Hung Chan; Yan Wang; Dan Huang; Qing Li; Wai T Wong; Gordon Choi; Huachun Zou; David Sc Hui; Jun Yu; Gary Tse; Tony Gin; William Kk Wu; Matthew Tv Chan; Lin Zhang
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-06-10

Review 9.  Altered Signal Transduction in the Immune Response to Influenza Virus and S. pneumoniae or S. aureus Co-Infections.

Authors:  Janine J Wilden; Jasmin C Jacob; Christina Ehrhardt; Stephan Ludwig; Yvonne Boergeling
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Superadded Coinfections and Antibiotic Resistance in the Context of COVID-19: Where do We Stand?

Authors:  Bhavana Kayarat; Puneet Khanna; Soumya Sarkar
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.