AIMS: To report trends in antibiotic resistance in cases of bacterial keratitis from a large eye hospital in South India. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, the microbiology laboratory records of patients with infectious keratitis diagnosed at an eye hospital in South India from 2002 to 2013 were reviewed to determine the proportion with antibiotic non-susceptibility. RESULTS: 3685 bacterial isolates had susceptibility testing performed over the 12-year period. The two most common organisms with resistance were Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=1204) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=894). Antibiotic non-susceptibility was generally uncommon for these two organisms and no significant trends were detected over the course of the study. In contrast, Staphylococcus aureus (N=211) isolates demonstrated a significant increase in fluoroquinolone non-susceptibility over the 12-year study period. This coincided with a significant increase in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) during the study period, though the increase in fluoroquinolone resistance was likewise seen in methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). For example, ofloxacin resistance in MSSA increased from 11.1% in 2002 to 66.7% in 2013 (p=0.002). No trends were apparent for the aminoglycosides, cefazolin or vancomycin, for which in vitro non-susceptibility generally appeared to be low. CONCLUSION: Resistance to antibiotics was generally stable for infectious keratitis isolates from a large eye hospital in South India, except for S. aureus, which experienced a significant increase in fluoroquinolone resistance from 2002 to 2013. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics currently have poor in vitro activity against both MRSA and MSSA in South India and are therefore not the ideal therapy for Staphylococcal corneal ulcers. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
AIMS: To report trends in antibiotic resistance in cases of bacterial keratitis from a large eye hospital in South India. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, the microbiology laboratory records of patients with infectious keratitis diagnosed at an eye hospital in South India from 2002 to 2013 were reviewed to determine the proportion with antibiotic non-susceptibility. RESULTS: 3685 bacterial isolates had susceptibility testing performed over the 12-year period. The two most common organisms with resistance were Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=1204) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=894). Antibiotic non-susceptibility was generally uncommon for these two organisms and no significant trends were detected over the course of the study. In contrast, Staphylococcus aureus (N=211) isolates demonstrated a significant increase in fluoroquinolone non-susceptibility over the 12-year study period. This coincided with a significant increase in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) during the study period, though the increase in fluoroquinolone resistance was likewise seen in methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). For example, ofloxacin resistance in MSSA increased from 11.1% in 2002 to 66.7% in 2013 (p=0.002). No trends were apparent for the aminoglycosides, cefazolin or vancomycin, for which in vitro non-susceptibility generally appeared to be low. CONCLUSION: Resistance to antibiotics was generally stable for infectious keratitis isolates from a large eye hospital in South India, except for S. aureus, which experienced a significant increase in fluoroquinolone resistance from 2002 to 2013. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics currently have poor in vitro activity against both MRSA and MSSA in South India and are therefore not the ideal therapy for Staphylococcal corneal ulcers. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: J Kaliamurthy; C A Nelson Jesudasan; P Geraldine; P Parmar; C M Kalavathy; P A Thomas Journal: Ophthalmic Res Date: 2005-03-04 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Lisa R McTaggart; Jennifer Doucet; Maria Witkowska; Susan E Richardson Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Genoveva Yague; Julia E Morris; Xiao-Su Pan; Katherine A Gould; L Mark Fisher Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Lawson Ung; Paulo J M Bispo; Swapna S Shanbhag; Michael S Gilmore; James Chodosh Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Kimberly M Brothers; Regis P Kowalski; Shenghe Tian; Paul R Kinchington; Robert M Q Shanks Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Kathryn J Ray; N Venkatesh Prajna; Prajna Lalitha; Revathi Rajaraman; Tiruvengada Krishnan; Sushila Patel; Manoranjan Das; Ranjeet Shah; Kavita Dhakhwa; Stephen D McLeod; Michael E Zegans; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Michelle Y Peng; Vicky Cevallos; Stephen D McLeod; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.651