Literature DB >> 27130683

Factors affecting efficiency of introducing foreign DNA and RNA into parthenogenetic or in vitro-fertilized porcine eggs by cytoplasmic microinjection.

Shuai Liu1,2, XiaoQun Liu3, HaiYan Huang3, QingYou Liu4, XiaoPing Su4, Peng Zhu4, HongLi Li4, KuiQing Cui4, BingKun Xie4, DeShun Shi4.   

Abstract

Cytoplasmic microinjection (CI) of foreign gene into in vivo fertilized zygotes has emerged as a useful tool for transgenic pig production. In the current study, we investigated factors affecting transgenic efficiency and developmental potential of parthenogenetic (PA) and in vitro-fertilized (IVF) porcine embryos produced by CI. These factors included adding of RNase inhibitor, DNA or RNA concentration, injection time, and different structures of plasmids. Our results showed that adding of 1-4 U/μL of RNase inhibitor did not have negative effect on development potential of CI-PA embryos, and RNase inhibitor injection significantly increased EGFP expressing rate of CI-PA embryos. High injection DNA concentration and long injection interval after PA significantly reduced blastocyst formation. Different molecular structures such as DNA or RNA affected CI-PA embryos development, and RNA had little harmful effect on pig's early embryonic development. EGFP expression rate of CI-IVF embryos was improved following the increase of foreign DNA concentration, but blastocyst formation rate was decreased. Injection time after IVF did not show any significant difference on embryonic development, but longer interval resulted in a significantly lower EGFP expressing rate. Cas9 mRNA and myostatin (GDF-8) sgRNA co-injection indicated that the mutation rate of CI-IVF group was significantly higher than that of CI-PA. The CI-IVF-generated embryos were then transferred to six recipient pigs, but no live piglets were obtained. The following pronuclear formation assessment showed more than 76.1% IVF zygotes were polyspermy. These results demonstrate that CI-PA and CI-IVF were effective methods for production of transgenic pig embryos. However, polyspermic fertilization and poor quality of porcine IVF blastocysts are still the main problem of resulting in pregnancy failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytoplasmic injection; In vitro-fertilized zygotes; Parthenogenetic oocytes; Porcine; Transgenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27130683     DOI: 10.1007/s11626-016-0025-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  36 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of porcine embryo in vitro production.

Authors:  Christopher G Grupen
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Translation of globin messenger RNA by the mouse ovum.

Authors:  R L Brinster; H Y Chen; M E Trumbauer; M R Avarbock
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Comparison of chemical, electrical, and combined activation methods for in vitro matured porcine oocytes.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Kuiqing Cui; Hong Li Li; Jun Ming Sun; Xing Rong Lu; Kai Yuan Shen; Qing You Liu; De Shun Shi
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.416

4.  Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs.

Authors:  R L Brinster; H Y Chen; M E Trumbauer; M K Yagle; R D Palmiter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  TALEN-mediated gene mutagenesis in rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Hailiang Liu; Yongchang Chen; Yuyu Niu; Kunshan Zhang; Yu Kang; Weihong Ge; Xiaojing Liu; Enfeng Zhao; Chencheng Wang; Shaoyun Lin; Bo Jing; Chenyang Si; Quan Lin; Xiaoying Chen; Haijun Lin; Xiuqiong Pu; Yingying Wang; Binlian Qin; Fang Wang; Hong Wang; Wei Si; Jing Zhou; Tao Tan; Tianqing Li; Shaohui Ji; Zhigang Xue; Yuping Luo; Liming Cheng; Qi Zhou; Siguang Li; Yi Eve Sun; Weizhi Ji
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Strategies for improving animal models for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Jose Cibelli; Marina E Emborg; Darwin J Prockop; Michael Roberts; Gerald Schatten; Mahendra Rao; John Harding; Oleg Mirochnitchenko
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 24.633

7.  Synthesis and secretion of ovalbumin by mouse-growing oocytes following microinjection of chick ovalbumin mRNA.

Authors:  B V Paynton; K M Ebert; R L Brinster
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Simplified technique for differential staining of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells of mouse and bovine blastocysts.

Authors:  G. A. Thouas; N. A. Korfiatis; A. J. French; G. M. Jones; A. O. Trounson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III.

Authors:  Elitza Deltcheva; Krzysztof Chylinski; Cynthia M Sharma; Karine Gonzales; Yanjie Chao; Zaid A Pirzada; Maria R Eckert; Jörg Vogel; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system.

Authors:  Victoria M Bedell; Ying Wang; Jarryd M Campbell; Tanya L Poshusta; Colby G Starker; Randall G Krug; Wenfang Tan; Sumedha G Penheiter; Alvin C Ma; Anskar Y H Leung; Scott C Fahrenkrug; Daniel F Carlson; Daniel F Voytas; Karl J Clark; Jeffrey J Essner; Stephen C Ekker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.