Literature DB >> 27130329

Mercury and methylmercury in aquatic sediment across western North America.

Jacob A Fleck1, Mark Marvin-DiPasquale2, Collin A Eagles-Smith3, Joshua T Ackerman4, Michelle A Lutz5, Michael Tate5, Charles N Alpers6, Britt D Hall7, David P Krabbenhoft5, Chris S Eckley8.   

Abstract

Large-scale assessments are valuable in identifying primary factors controlling total mercury (THg) and monomethyl mercury (MeHg) concentrations, and distribution in aquatic ecosystems. Bed sediment THg and MeHg concentrations were compiled for >16,000 samples collected from aquatic habitats throughout the West between 1965 and 2013. The influence of aquatic feature type (canals, estuaries, lakes, and streams), and environmental setting (agriculture, forest, open-water, range, wetland, and urban) on THg and MeHg concentrations was examined. THg concentrations were highest in lake (29.3±6.5μgkg(-1)) and canal (28.6±6.9μgkg(-1)) sites, and lowest in stream (20.7±4.6μgkg(-1)) and estuarine (23.6±5.6μgkg(-1)) sites, which was partially a result of differences in grain size related to hydrologic gradients. By environmental setting, open-water (36.8±2.2μgkg(-1)) and forested (32.0±2.7μgkg(-1)) sites generally had the highest THg concentrations, followed by wetland sites (28.9±1.7μgkg(-1)), rangeland (25.5±1.5μgkg(-1)), agriculture (23.4±2.0μgkg(-1)), and urban (22.7±2.1μgkg(-1)) sites. MeHg concentrations also were highest in lakes (0.55±0.05μgkg(-1)) and canals (0.54±0.11μgkg(-1)), but, in contrast to THg, MeHg concentrations were lowest in open-water sites (0.22±0.03μgkg(-1)). The median percent MeHg (relative to THg) for the western region was 0.7%, indicating an overall low methylation efficiency; however, a significant subset of data (n>100) had percentages that represent elevated methylation efficiency (>6%). MeHg concentrations were weakly correlated with THg (r(2)=0.25) across western North America. Overall, these results highlight the large spatial variability in sediment THg and MeHg concentrations throughout western North America and underscore the important roles that landscape and land-use characteristics have on the MeHg cycle. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic sediment; Mercury methylation; Spatial mercury patterns; WNAMS; Western North American Mercury Synthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27130329     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Artificial lake expansion amplifies mercury pollution from gold mining.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Gerson; Simon N Topp; Claudia M Vega; John R Gardner; Xiao Yang; Luis E Fernandez; Emily S Bernhardt; Tamlin M Pavelsky
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 14.136

2.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 3.  Biotic formation of methylmercury: A bio-physico-chemical conundrum.

Authors:  Andrea G Bravo; Claudia Cosio
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.745

4.  Methylmercury in Industrial Harbor Sediments in Taiwan: First Observations on its Occurrence, Distribution, and Measurement.

Authors:  Chih-Feng Chen; Yun-Ru Ju; Guan-Ting Lin; Chiu-Wen Chen; Cheng-Di Dong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Jane L Kirk; Lei Zhang; Elsie M Sunderland; Martin Jiskra; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.