Literature DB >> 27130265

Is It Time to Revisit the Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer?

Viacheslav Iremashvili1, Bruce R Kava2, Murugesan Manoharan2, Dipen J Parekh2, Sanoj Punnen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that are not available at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis and are associated with the risk of biopsy progression in active surveillance (AS) patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 314 AS patients who had at least 1 repeat biopsy. We used logistic regression to analyze the association between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its derivatives, including PSA density, PSA velocity (PSAV) and doubling time (PSADT); presence of bilateral disease and number of previous successive negative surveillance biopsies; and the risk of progression on the surveillance biopsies first through fourth.
RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 3.1 years, patients had a mean of 2.4 biopsies. The median time from diagnosis to the last biopsy was 2.3 years. The biopsies were performed at fairly equal intervals. For surveillance biopsies 1 through 3, none of the studied factors was adding significant prognostic information to the baseline characteristics. PSAV and PSADT were associated with the risk of progression on the fourth biopsy; this association was independent of baseline characteristics. No progression on the fourth biopsy was noted in 23 patients with negative PSAV. Among 54 patients with PSADT of more than 3 years only, 2 progressed whereas 6 out of 9 patients with a PSADT less than 3 years had biopsy progression on the fourth surveillance biopsy.
CONCLUSION: PSA kinetics may be helpful in defining the indications for prostate biopsy in AS patients who are followed with regular biopsies for more than 3-4 years.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27130265     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Clinical experience with active surveillance protocol using regular magnetic resonance imaging instead of regular repeat biopsy for monitoring: A study at a high-volume center in Korea.

Authors:  Hyun Kyu Ahn; Kwang Suk Lee; Kyo Chul Koo; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-12-05

2.  Quantitative prediction of oral cancer risk in patients with oral leukoplakia.

Authors:  Yao Liu; Yicheng Li; Yue Fu; Tong Liu; Xiaoyong Liu; Xinyan Zhang; Jie Fu; Xiaobing Guan; Tong Chen; Xiaoxin Chen; Zheng Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

Review 3.  Indications for and transitioning to secondary treatment while on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Allison S Glass; Marc A Dall'Era
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-04

Review 4.  Clinical and pathologic factors predicting reclassification in active surveillance cohorts.

Authors:  Pablo S Sierra; Shivashankar Damodaran; David Jarrard
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Four-year outcomes from a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based active surveillance programme: PSA dynamics and serial MRI scans allow omission of protocol biopsies.

Authors:  Kevin Michael Gallagher; Edward Christopher; Andrew James Cameron; Scott Little; Alasdair Innes; Gill Davis; Julian Keanie; Prasad Bollina; Alan McNeill
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Gabe Rohmann; Robert Galbreath; Whitney Scholl; Ryan Fiano; Abbey Bennett; Wayne M Butler; Edward Adamovich
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-11-29

7.  Low-risk prostate cancer selected for active surveillance with negative MRI at entry: can repeat biopsies at 1 year be avoided? A pilot study.

Authors:  Jonathan Olivier; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Elodie Drumez; Jean-Christophe Fantoni; Xavier Leroy; Philippe Puech; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.226

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.