Philip Bucur1, Martin Hofmann1, Ashleigh Menhadji1, Garen Abedi1, Zhamshid Okhunov1, Joseph Rinehart2, Jaime Landman3. 1. Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA. 2. Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA. 3. Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA. Electronic address: landmanj@uci.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the variation in pneumoperitoneum and physiologic effects of patients undergoinglaparoscopic renal surgery using the valveless trocar insufflation system (VI) vs a conventional insufflation system (CI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a single-center, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing renal surgery at 15 mm Hg insufflation using a VI system vs a CI system. The primary outcome measured was variation in insufflation pressure, and end-tidal CO2 at 10 and 25 minutes. RESULTS:Fifty-six patients (VI n = 28 or CIn = 28) met inclusion criteria and were randomized. There was significantly less variability in pressure readings, as measured by coefficient of variation, during VI compared to CI (7.8% vs 15.6%, P < .001). There was significantly less time spent within the range with pressure readings ≥18 mm Hg (median 0.2% vs 16.5%, P < .001) and ≤12 mm Hg (median 1.7% vs 5.6%, P = .011) during VI compared to CI. Additionally, there was significantly less time spent with pressure readings in the "unacceptable" range of ≥20 mm Hg (median 0% vs 0.08%, P < .001) and ≤10 mm Hg (median 0.09% vs 2.6%, P < .001) during the cases with VI compared to CI. End-tidal CO2 was significantly lower at 10 minutes (P = .036) after insufflation in the valveless trocar group compared to the conventional treatment group. There were no other significant differences in physiologic metrics. CONCLUSION: Compared with a CI, the VI provides a significantly more stable pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic renal surgery and lower end-tidal CO2 at 10 minutes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the variation in pneumoperitoneum and physiologic effects of patients undergoing laparoscopic renal surgery using the valveless trocar insufflation system (VI) vs a conventional insufflation system (CI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a single-center, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing renal surgery at 15 mm Hg insufflation using a VI system vs a CI system. The primary outcome measured was variation in insufflation pressure, and end-tidal CO2 at 10 and 25 minutes. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (VI n = 28 or CI n = 28) met inclusion criteria and were randomized. There was significantly less variability in pressure readings, as measured by coefficient of variation, during VI compared to CI (7.8% vs 15.6%, P < .001). There was significantly less time spent within the range with pressure readings ≥18 mm Hg (median 0.2% vs 16.5%, P < .001) and ≤12 mm Hg (median 1.7% vs 5.6%, P = .011) during VI compared to CI. Additionally, there was significantly less time spent with pressure readings in the "unacceptable" range of ≥20 mm Hg (median 0% vs 0.08%, P < .001) and ≤10 mm Hg (median 0.09% vs 2.6%, P < .001) during the cases with VI compared to CI. End-tidal CO2 was significantly lower at 10 minutes (P = .036) after insufflation in the valveless trocar group compared to the conventional treatment group. There were no other significant differences in physiologic metrics. CONCLUSION: Compared with a CI, the VI provides a significantly more stable pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic renal surgery and lower end-tidal CO2 at 10 minutes.
Authors: Michele Diana; Eric Noll; Andras Legnèr; Seong-Ho Kong; Yu-Yin Liu; Luigi Schiraldi; Francesco Marchegiani; Jordan Bano; Bernard Geny; Anne-Laure Charles; Bernard Dallemagne; Véronique Lindner; Didier Mutter; Pierre Diemunsch; Jacques Marescaux Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: S Celarier; S Monziols; M O Francois; V Assenat; P Carles; M Capdepont; C Fleming; E Rullier; G Napolitano; Q Denost Journal: Trials Date: 2020-02-22 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Alessandro Buda; Giampaolo Di Martino; Martina Borghese; Stefano Restaino; Alessandra Surace; Andrea Puppo; Sara Paracchini; Debora Ferrari; Stefania Perotto; Antonia Novelli; Elena De Ponti; Chiara Borghi; Francesco Fanfani; Robert Fruscio Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-03-14