Literature DB >> 27129876

p53 status correlates with the risk of progression in stage T1 bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.

Jun Du1, Shu-hua Wang1, Qing Yang1, Qian-qian Chen1, Xin Yao2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Published studies have yielded inconsistent results on the relationship between p53 status and the progression of stage T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of p53 in T1 NMIBC.
METHODS: We systematically searched for relevant literatures in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Data were pooled together from individual studies, and meta-analysis was performed. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CI were calculated to estimate the effect sizes. Moreover, subgroup analyses were carried out.
RESULTS: A total of 12 studies comprising 712 patients were subjected to the final analysis. p53 overexpression was significantly associated with higher progression rate of T1 NMIBC (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.59-3.38). Moderate heterogeneity was observed across the studies (I(2) = 39%, P < 0.0001). In a subgroup analysis stratified by stage, p53 overexpression was a predictor of progression in T1 grade 3 NMIBC (RR 2.71, 95% CI 1.31-5.64). In addition, in a subgroup analysis stratified by intravesical therapy, p53 overexpression was a predictor of progression in T1 NMIBC received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin intravesical therapy (RR 3.35, 95% CI 1.89-5.93). Furthermore, after excluding the study that possibly contributed to the heterogeneity by the sensitivity analysis, the association p53 overexpression was significantly correlated with progression of T1 NMIBC (RR 2.74, 95% CI 2.05-3.65) without evidence of heterogeneity (I(2) = 0 %, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested that p53 overexpression may be associated with progression of T1 NMIBC patients. Because of the heterogeneity and other limitations, further studies with rigid criteria and large populations are still warranted to confirm our findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; Progression; Stage T1; p53

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27129876      PMCID: PMC4851770          DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0890-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1477-7819            Impact factor:   2.754


Background

There are 386,000 new cases of bladder cancer worldwide every year and caused 150,000 cancer-specific deaths [1]. Approximately 70 % of bladder cancer are non-muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBCs) at the time of presentation [2], and stage T1 disease showing invasion of the lamina propria present 25 % of NMIBC [3]. T1 NMIBC represent a clinical challenge because they are inherently aggressive and have heterogeneous outcomes. Up to 50 % of T1 NMIBC managed with intravesical therapy progress to muscle invasive BC (MIBC) within 5 years [4]. Progression rather than recurrence has been associated with increased chance of metastasis and death from systemic disease. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has proposed a scoring system for predicting progression of NMIBC using a weighted variable system including grade (WHO 1973), stage, CIS, multiplicity, size, and previous recurrence rate [5]. Although the EORTC risk score represents a major improvement, it does not fully capture tumor heterogeneity of T1 NMIBC. Another approach has been to identify biomarkers to predict the probability of progression in T1 NMIBC [6]. Cell cycle modulators are often deregulated in bladder cancer, including alterations in various proteins such as p53, CCNB1, p16, and p27 [6, 7]. p53 is frequently mutated in patients with bladder cancer [8, 9]. Compared with the wild-type protein, mutant p53 proteins have a prolonged half-life and are thus more likely to be detected by immunohistochemical assays [10]. In bladder cancer, because of the high concordance between p53 nuclear immunoreactivity and genomic mutations, immunohistochemistry is a useful surrogate for examining p53 mutation status [9, 11]. The value of pretreatment p53 status on the progression of T1 NMIBC has been studied and discussed. As a result, several studies reported that p53 overexpression is positively associated with progression of T1 NMIBC [12, 13]. However, some studies failed to confirm the association between p53 overexpression and progression of T1 NMIBC [14, 15]. Considering the inconsistent results of published articles, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the p53 status in predicting progression of T1 NMIBC.

Methods

Search strategy

We conducted and reported this meta-analysis following the PRISMA statement. A MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science search for studies investigating the progression significance of p53 in T1 bladder cancer was performed using the following keywords: [urinary bladder neoplasms] OR [urinary AND bladder AND neoplasms] OR [bladder AND cancer] OR [bladder cancer] AND [T1] AND [p53] OR [TP53] AND [progression]. The final search was conducted on October 10, 2015. Searches were limited to studies published in English. The eligible publications were selected by two reviewers.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies were considered eligible if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) the study included proven diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma; (2) the study considered TURBT as a treatment modality; (3) the study assessed the association between p53 and progression of patients with T1 bladder cancer; (4) to detect p53 status in the primary tumor tissues using immunohistochemistry (IHC); and (5) the study provided the data that showed number of events. Studies were excluded based on any of the following criteria: (1) review articles, commentaries, letters to the editor, or case reports or (2) laboratory studies, such as studies on bladder cancer cell lines and animal models; for overlapping studies, the most recent or most complete study was used to avoid duplication of information.

Data extraction

According to the inclusion criteria listed above, data were extracted independently by two reviewers for each eligible study. We extracted data including (1) study information including the name of first author, year of publication, sample size, and time of research; (2) patient characters including grade and intravesical therapy; (3) p53 antibody clone and cutoff value of positivity of p53; and (4) progression data (number of events).

Study quality assessment

Quality assessment of included studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers (DJ and WSH) with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) range from 0 to 8 which is used in the evaluation of non-randomized studies. Studies with an NOS score ≥6 were assigned as high-quality studies. Studies from conference abstracts and with score of zero were defined as low-quality studies. Discordant studies were evaluated by the two reviewers together.

Statistical analysis

The main outcome measures for this meta-analysis were rates of progression. The primary aim was to search the effect of p53 status (positive or negative) detected by IHC on progression rates. For dichotomous data, a summary risk ratio (RR) and its 95 % CI were calculated. An observed HR >1 implied progression for the study group with positive p53, relative to the negative group. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine if our pooled estimate of the prognostic value was influenced by a test of heterogeneity of the combined HRs, carried out using the Chi-square test and I-squared statistic. A P > 0.10 for the Chi-square test and an I2 value of <25 % was considered to represent a low level of heterogeneity between studies. I2 > 50 % indicated large heterogeneity among studies, whereas I2 values between 25 and 50 % indicated moderate heterogeneity [16]. Sensitivity analysis was also performed by removing one study at a time to calculate the overall homogeneity and effect size; the Galbraith plot was also performed to examine the possible distinct articles. Publication bias was estimated with a visual inspection of funnel plots. All 95 % CIs were two-sided. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.2 (RevMan 5.2; the Nordic Cochrane Center, the Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).

Results

Study eligibility

Through electronic screening, 151 potentially relevant articles consistent with our searching terms were identified and 106 of them were eliminated after reading the abstracts. Of the 45 article that were in full-text format, 24 were excluded because of not including progression data; 9 were excluded since there were no specific result about p53 status in T1 NMIBC. The flowchart of selecting the procedure and the exclusive reason of studies is summarized in Fig. 1. A total of 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Flowchart of study selection

Table 1

Studies included in the meta-analysis

StudyYearCountryp53 (+)p53 (−)No. of patientsCutoff (%)AntibodyIntravesical therapyQuality score
Park [21]2013Korea32296110DO7Pure BCG7
Dalbagni [14]2007USA53368920Pab1801Non-pure5.5
Saint [12]2004France247810220DO7Pure BCG6
Lopez-Beltran [29]2004Spain2229516Pab1801Pure BCG7
Gil [15]2003Spain40276720DO7Non-pure7
Peyromaure [22]2002France18112920DO7Pure BCG6
Liopis [13]2000Spain24568020Bp-53-12-1Non-pure8
Shariat [30]2000USA26103610DO7Non-pure7
Toktas [31]1999Turkey18343610DO7Non-pure6
Pages [23]1998France27164310DO7Pure BCG6
Vatne [32]1995Norway40195920DO1Non-pure7
Sarkis [8]1993USA25184320Pab1801Non-pure7
Flowchart of study selection Studies included in the meta-analysis

Quality assessment

Quality assessment of the 12 studies included in the meta-analysis was performed by using NOS. In this quality assessment system, scores 0–3, 4–5, and 6–8 are accepted as low, medium, and high quality, respectively. The median score of the studies included in the meta-analysis was found as 7.

Heterogeneity assessment

Meta-analysis of the correlation between p53 overexpression with progression of T1 NMIBC resulted in P < 0.0001 and I2 = 39 %, suggesting that there was moderate heterogeneity and that the subgroup analysis should be carried out. Hence, we carried out subgroup analysis according to stage, intravesical therapy, antibody clone, cutoff value of positivity of p53, and ethnicity. However, none of these factors was found to be significantly correlated to heterogeneity using subgroup analysis among the studies.

Meta-analysis results

Pooled analysis

p53 overexpression and progression of T1 NMIBC

There were 12 studies with a total of 712 patients included in final analysis to assess the effect of p53 overexpression on progression of T1 NMIBC. As shown in Fig. 2, the pooled RR was 2.32 (95 % CI 1.59–3.38) by random-effects model for the existence of a moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 39 %, P < 0.0001), which suggested p53 overexpression was associated with progression of T1 NMIBC. Subgroup analysis according to grade, intravesical therapy, antibody clone, cutoff value of positivity of p53, and ethnicity was also performed (Table 2). The results suggested that all of the relevant stratified factors did not have a significant correlation with heterogeneity (P ranging from 0.18 to 0.63) and did not alter the significant prognostic impact of p53 overexpression.
Fig. 2

Forest plots of RRs estimated for the relationship between p53 overexpression and progression of T1 NMIBC patients

Table 2

Summarized RRs of overall and subgroup analysis for T1 NMIBC patients with p53 overexpression

VariablesNo. of studiesRandom effectsRR (95 % CI)HeterogeneitySubgroup analysis P value
I 2 (%) P value
Overall122.41 (1.55, 3.75)420.06<0.0001
Ethnicity0.44
Asian23.09 (1.48, 6.46)00.003
 Non-Asian102.20 (1.41, 3.45)460.0005
 Stage0.63
 T1G332.71 (1.31, 5.64)00.007
 All NMIBC92.24 (1.40, 3.59)520.0008
Intravesical therapy0.18
 Pure BCG53.35 (1.89, 5.93)0<0.0001
 Non-pure71.97 (1.17, 3.33)570.03
Antibody0.49
 DO772.59 (1.64, 4.08)0<0.0001
 Pab180133.38 (1.73, 6.60)00.0003
 Others21.38 (0.36, 5.34)890.002
Cutoff0.41
 20 %72.68 (1.92, 3.74)9<0.0001
 Others51.83 (0.78, 4.26)510.16
Forest plots of RRs estimated for the relationship between p53 overexpression and progression of T1 NMIBC patients Summarized RRs of overall and subgroup analysis for T1 NMIBC patients with p53 overexpression

Subgroup analysis

p53 overexpression and progression of T1G3 NMIBC

There were 3 studies that included a total of 141 pure T1 grade 3 (T1G3) NMIBC patients; the RR was 2.71 (95 % CI 1.31–5.64) by random-effects model for the existence of no heterogeneity (I2 = 0 %, P = 0.007), which suggested p53 overexpression was associated with progression of T1G3 NMIBC (Table 2).

p53 overexpression and progression of T1 NMIBC treated with BCG

There were 4 studies that included a total of 286 pure T1 NMIBC patients treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical therapy; the RR was 2.71 (95 % CI 1.31–5.64) by random-effects model for the existence of no heterogeneity (I2 = 0 %, P < 0.0001), which suggested p53 overexpression was associated with progression of T1 NMIBC patients treated with BCG intravesical therapy (Table 2).

Publication bias assessment and sensitivity analysis

Investigation of bias by a funnel plot showed no evidence of significant publication bias among the studies with respect to the effect of p53 status on progression of T1 NMIBC (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Publication bias determination using funnel plot

Publication bias determination using funnel plot Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the influence of individual study on the pooled effect. One study by Vatne et al. was identified in the Galbraith plot as the outliers (Fig. 4). When we removed the study by Vatne et al., the initial heterogeneity (I2 = 39 %, P < 0.0001) was reduced to none (I2 = 0 %, P = 0.63) in evaluating the association of p53 overexpression and progression of T1 NMIBC patients (Table 3).
Fig. 4

Galbraith plot of association between p53 overexpression and T1 NMIBC patient progression risk

Table 3

Results of sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysisHeterogeneityPooled analysis
I 2 (%) P valueRR (95 % CI) P value
Include Vatne et al.’s study390.082.32 (1.59, 3.38)<0.0001
Exclude Vatne et al.’s study00.672.74 (2.05, 3.65)<0.0001
Galbraith plot of association between p53 overexpression and T1 NMIBC patient progression risk Results of sensitivity analysis

Discussion

T1 NMIBC are potentially more lethal because approximately 40 % of tumors managed conservatively progress to MIBC or develop distant metastasis within 5 years [3]. Molecular markers are promising for accurately predicting the progression of T1 NMIBC patients. p53 plays an important role in the regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis. To date, the majority of available clinical reports have involved small sample sizes and given conflicting results, therefore unable to determine the value of p53 status in predicting progression of T1 NMIBC. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of 12 studies to systematically evaluate the association between p53 status and progression of T1 NMIBC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between p53 status and the progression of T1 NMIBC. In the overall pooled analysis of the association of p53 status with progression of T1 NMIBC, the results suggested that p53 overexpression associated with progression of T1 NMIBC. In the test of heterogeneity, there was a moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 39 %) in the analysis of the association of p53 status with progression of T1 NMIBC. Although the data were aggregated using the random-effects models, heterogeneity among the studies continued to be a potential problem to influence the reliability of pooled results. Hence, we carried out subgroup analysis according to grade, intravesical therapy, antibody clone, cutoff value of positivity of p53, and ethnicity. However, none of these factors was found to be significantly correlated to heterogeneity using a subgroup analysis. However, there is no heterogeneity in T1G3 NMIBC (I2 = 0 %); it suggested that p53 overexpression was associated with incremental progression of T1G3 NMIBC. T1G3 NMIBC is one subtype of NMIBC, with the highest progression risk [17]. Because T1G3 NMIBC can present clinical characteristics of invasive tumors and clinical T1 tumors contain a variable proportion of understaged pT2 tumors, long-term rates of cancer-specific mortality reach up to 34 % [18]. Expert recommendations on the optimal treatment strategy for patients with T1G3 NMIBC range from conservative intravesical therapy to early radical cystectomy [18, 19]. Underestimation of the potential for progression in T1G3 NMIBC could lead to unpreventable morbidity and mortality; however, patients treated with early radical cystectomy faced increased perioperative mortality and decreased quality-of-life. Therefore, T1G3 NMIBC patients with p53 overexpression may probably obtain better benefit from early radical cystectomy. In addition, we did not observe heterogeneity in patients treated with BCG intravesical therapy (I2 = 0 %); it suggested that p53 overexpression was associated with elevated progression of T1 NMIBC received by BCG intravesical therapy. Several investigators have evaluated the prognostic value of nuclear p53 immunoreactivity before BCG intravesical therapy. A correlation between pretreatment p53 overexpression and disease progression after BCG therapy was found in several studies [12, 20]. Other authors found no such correlation [21-26]. Nevertheless, it was found that BCG treatment was less likely to be successful in patients with mutated p53 by using yeast functional assay [27]. To date, whether p53 tumor status is an independent predictive factor of BCG response in T1 NMIBC still remains a debate. The present meta-analysis suggested that T1 NMIBC patients with p53 overexpression have increased progression risk after BCG intravesical therapy; early radical cystectomy could be considered in these patients. It should be noted that our meta-analysis has several limitations. First, this meta-analysis was limited by the presence of heterogeneity across the studies. The heterogeneity possibly caused by the differences in the characteristics of the patients, IHC technique, cutoff values, and follow-up time. Second, to reduce the bias from different detection methods, we only included the studies measuring p53 expression by IHC. IHC has been widely used to detect molecular markers, because the method is simple, fast, and reliable [28]. However, the differences of the clones of antibody, concentration, and cutoff value used in different studies might also cause potential bias. Especially, the cutoff used to define p53 overexpression is probably of prime importance. In the present meta-analysis, most of the studies chose a cutoff value of 20 %; p53 overexpression was a predictor of progression in T1 NMIBC, and there is low heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 9 %, P < 0.0001). It suggested that a cutoff value of 20 % may be a proper cutoff of p53. Furthermore, the interpretation of immunohistochemical results may vary among different centers. It is, therefore, necessary to define a standard evaluation system to promote the application of p53 detected by IHC in clinical practice. Third, the meta-analysis may have been influenced by publication bias, as we limited the literature search to studies performed in English. Finally, most of the included studies were observational trials, which contained more potential confounders and provided the lower level of evidence compared with randomized controlled studies. Therefore, the results should be interpreted cautiously.

Conclusions

The present study is the first meta-analysis to quantitatively assess the association between p53 status and progression of T1 NMIBC. The results showed that p53 overexpression might be a useful predictive biomarker for evaluating progression in T1 NMIBC patients, especially in T1G3 NMIBC and patients treated by BCG intravesical therapy. However, to strengthen our findings, further larger prospective studies with better standardized methods are needed to make a comprehensive conclusion on the prognostic role of p53 overexpression in T1 NMIBC.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
  32 in total

1.  p53 expression predicts progression and poor survival in T1 bladder tumours.

Authors:  J Llopis; A Alcaraz; M J Ribal; M Solé; P J Ventura; M A Barranco; A Rodriguez; J M Corral; P Carretero
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Overexpression of p53 protein in a high-risk population of patients with superficial bladder cancer before and after bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy: correlation to clinical outcome.

Authors:  L Lacombe; G Dalbagni; Z F Zhang; C Cordon-Cardo; W R Fair; H W Herr; V E Reuter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  p53 status does not predict initial clinical response to bacillus Calmette-Guerin intravesical therapy in T1 bladder tumors.

Authors:  F Pages; T A Flam; A Vieillefond; V Molinie; X Abeille; V Lazar; B Bressac-de Paillerets; V Mosseri; M Zerbib; W H Fridman; B Debré; N Thiounn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Expression of genes related to apoptosis, cell cycle and signaling pathways are independent of TP53 status in urinary bladder cancer cells.

Authors:  Glenda N da Silva; Adriane F Evangelista; Danielle A Magalhães; Cláudia Macedo; Michelle C Búfalo; Elza T Sakamoto-Hojo; Geraldo A S Passos; Daisy M F Salvadori
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Significance of protein p53 overexpression in the clinical course of high-risk superficial bladder cancer.

Authors:  P Gil; C Allepuz; M Blas; A Borque; C del Agua; L Plaza; L A Rioja
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Prognostic value of P53 nuclear accumulation and histopathologic features in T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  S F Shariat; A Z Weizer; A Green; R Laucirica; A Frolov; T M Wheeler; S P Lerner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Correlation and prognostic significance of p53, p21WAF1/CIP1 and Ki-67 expression in patients with superficial bladder tumors treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin intravesical therapy.

Authors:  A R Zlotta; J C Noel; I Fayt; A Drowart; J P Van Vooren; K Huygen; J Simon; C C Schulman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A Molecular Pathologic Framework for Risk Stratification of Stage T1 Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Oliver Patschan; Gottfrid Sjödahl; Gunilla Chebil; Kristina Lövgren; Martin Lauss; Sigurdur Gudjonsson; Petter Kollberg; Pontus Eriksson; Mattias Aine; Wiking Månsson; Mårten Fernö; Fredrik Liedberg; Mattias Höglund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Nuclear accumulation of mutant p53 protein: a possible predictor of failure of intravesical therapy in bladder cancer.

Authors:  M Caliskan; L N Türkeri; B Mansuroglu; G Toktas; B Aksoy; E Unlüer; A Akdas
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-03

10.  Nuclear overexpression of p53 protein in transitional cell bladder carcinoma: a marker for disease progression.

Authors:  A S Sarkis; G Dalbagni; C Cordon-Cardo; Z F Zhang; J Sheinfeld; W R Fair; H W Herr; V E Reuter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-01-06       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  High-grade T1 Urothelial Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Wesley Yip; Akbar Ashrafi; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Genetic aberrations of the K-ras proto-oncogene in bladder cancer in relation to pesticide exposure.

Authors:  Diaa A Hameed; Heba A Yassa; Michael N Agban; Randa T Hanna; Ahmed M Elderwy; Mohamed A Zwaita
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Role of downregulated miR-133a-3p expression in bladder cancer: a bioinformatics study.

Authors:  Li Gao; Sheng-Hua Li; Yi-Xin Tian; Qing-Qing Zhu; Gang Chen; Yu-Yan Pang; Xiao-Hua Hu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Clinical effects of p53 overexpression in squamous cell carcinoma of the sinonasal tract: A systematic meta-analysis with PRISMA guidelines.

Authors:  Xiaowei Wang; Wei Lv; Fang Qi; Zhiqiang Gao; Hua Yang; Weiqing Wang; Yali Gao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Impact of the Ki-67 labeling index and p53 expression status on disease-free survival in pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Malte W Vetterlein; Julia Roschinski; Philipp Gild; Phillip Marks; Armin Soave; Ousman Doh; Hendrik Isbarn; Wolfgang Höppner; Walter Wagner; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maurizio Brausi; Franziska Büscheck; Guido Sauter; Margit Fisch; Michael Rink
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-12

6.  Prognostic value of ki67 in BCG-treated non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Yuhui He; Ning Wang; Xiaofeng Zhou; Jianfeng Wang; Zhenshan Ding; Xing Chen; Yisen Deng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Novel protein signatures suggest progression to muscular invasiveness in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Magnus Berle; Luiza Ghila; Heidrun Vethe; Adeel Chaudhry; Hilde Garberg; Christian Beisland; Øystein Ariansen Haaland; Eystein Oveland; Ole Johan Halvorsen; Thomas Davidsson; Simona Chera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential of Biomarkers CYFRA 21.1, ERCC1, p53, FGFR3 and TATI in Bladder Cancers.

Authors:  Milena Matuszczak; Maciej Salagierski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  DHCR24 predicts poor clinicopathological features of patients with bladder cancer: A STROBE-compliant study.

Authors:  Xiao-Ping Liu; Xiao-Hong Yin; Xiang-Yu Meng; Xin-Hui Yan; Yue Cao; Xian-Tao Zeng; Xing-Huan Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  Molecular markers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Tilman Todenhöfer; Jakub Dobruch; Anirban P Mitra; Brant A Inman; Kilian M Gust; Yair Lotan; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.