D Alan Nelson1, Vickee L Wolcott2, Lianne M Kurina1. 1. Division of Primary, Preventive, and Community Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA. 2. Army-Baylor University Graduate Program in Health and Business Administration, Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), Ft Sam Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Long-term occupational disability rates associated with eventual discharges from military service have risen sharply among active-duty US Army soldiers during the last three decades, with important implications for soldier health and national security alike. To address this problem, we built predictive models for long-term, all-cause occupational disability and identified disability risk factors using a very large, multisource database on the total active-duty US Army. METHODS: We conducted a cross-temporal retrospective cohort study and used mixed-effects logistic regression models to derive and validate disability risk assignments. The derivation cohort included 510 616 US Army soldiers on duty in December 2012, and the validation cohort included 483 197 soldiers on duty in December 2013. RESULTS: The predictive model yielded an overall c-statistic of 85.97% (95% CI 85.61% to 86.32%). Risk thresholds at the population's 75th and 95th centiles identified 80.53% and 42.08%, respectively, of the disability designations that occurred population wide during the subsequent 9 months. Frequent work excusals, high outpatient care utilisation and psychotropic medication use were the strongest independent predictors of later disability. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that predictive models using diverse data types can successfully anticipate long-term occupational disability among US Army soldiers and could be used for disability risk screening. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
INTRODUCTION: Long-term occupational disability rates associated with eventual discharges from military service have risen sharply among active-duty US Army soldiers during the last three decades, with important implications for soldier health and national security alike. To address this problem, we built predictive models for long-term, all-cause occupational disability and identified disability risk factors using a very large, multisource database on the total active-duty US Army. METHODS: We conducted a cross-temporal retrospective cohort study and used mixed-effects logistic regression models to derive and validate disability risk assignments. The derivation cohort included 510 616 US Army soldiers on duty in December 2012, and the validation cohort included 483 197 soldiers on duty in December 2013. RESULTS: The predictive model yielded an overall c-statistic of 85.97% (95% CI 85.61% to 86.32%). Risk thresholds at the population's 75th and 95th centiles identified 80.53% and 42.08%, respectively, of the disability designations that occurred population wide during the subsequent 9 months. Frequent work excusals, high outpatient care utilisation and psychotropic medication use were the strongest independent predictors of later disability. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that predictive models using diverse data types can successfully anticipate long-term occupational disability among US Army soldiers and could be used for disability risk screening. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Patricia Ots; Karen M Oude Hengel; Alex Burdorf; Suzan J W Robroek; Daan Nieboer; Jolinda L D Schram; Sander K R van Zon; Sandra Brouwer Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Jaakko Airaksinen; Markus Jokela; Marianna Virtanen; Tuula Oksanen; Jaana Pentti; Jussi Vahtera; Markku Koskenvuo; Ichiro Kawachi; G David Batty; Mika Kivimäki Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 4.379