| Literature DB >> 27129304 |
Wei Zheng1, Ai Zhao1, Yong Xue2, Yingdong Zheng3, Yun Chen4, Zhishen Mu4, Peiyu Wang1, Yumei Zhang5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood dyslipidemia is a critical factor of lifelong health. Therefore, screening and controlling dyslipidemia from childhood is a practical healthy strategy. However, few studies have examined the performance of anthropometric predictors of dyslipidemia in Chinese children, let alone the potential gender and urban-rural disparity. Thus, we evaluated anthropometric indices predicting dyslipidemia by genders and living areas in Chinese children.Entities:
Keywords: Body mass index; Dyslipidemia; Mid-upper arm height ratio; Serum lipid; Waist-hip ratio
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27129304 PMCID: PMC4851820 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0255-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Serum lipid profiles (mmol/L) in Chinese primary school children by gender and by living area
| Urban area |
| Rural area |
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | ||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| n | 311 | 272 | 88 | 102 | |||||||
| TC | 3.96 | 0.62 | 3.96 | 0.63 | 0.9 | 3.43 | 0.54 | 3.58 | 0.69 | 0.09 | <0.0001 |
| TG | 0.99 | 0.52 | 1.04 | 0.60 | 0.3 | 0.92 | 0.64 | 0.95 | 0.47 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| HDL-C | 1.49 | 0.36 | 1.46 | 0.33 | 0.2 | 1.40 | 0.26 | 1.41 | 0.27 | 0.7 | 0.006 |
| LDL-C | 1.94 | 0.52 | 1.94 | 0.52 | 1 | 1.64 | 0.40 | 1.74 | 0.60 | 0.2 | <0.0001 |
TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol
*p-value was calculated by Student’s t-test.
Partial correlation coefficients between anthropometric measurements and serum lipid profilesa
| TC | TG | HDL-C | LDL-C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | ||||
| BMI z-score | 0.22 (<0.0001) | 0.22 (<0.0001) | −0.12 (0.01) | 0.21 (<0.0001) |
| WHR | 0.15 (0.002) | 0.26 (<0.0001) | −0.18 (0.0003) | 0.14 (0.007) |
| WHtR | 0.21 (<0.0001) | 0.31 (<0.0001) | −0.18 (0.0003) | 0.19 (0.0002) |
| MaHtR | 0.27 (<0.0001) | 0.26 (<0.0001) | −0.07 (0.1) | 0.23 (<0.0001) |
| Girls | ||||
| BMI z-score | 0.10 (0.06) | 0.11 (0.04) | −0.10 (0.05) | 0.11 (0.04) |
| WHR | −0.05 (0.4) | 0.10 (0.047) | −0.13 (0.02) | −0.03 (0.5) |
| WHtR | 0.01 (0.8) | 0.10 (0.07) | −0.15 (0.003) | 0.03 (0.5) |
| MaHtR | 0.11 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.1) | −0.006 (0.9) | 0.08 (0.1) |
TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, BMI body mass index, WHR waist-hip ratio, WHtR waist-height ratio, MaHtR mid-upper arm height ratio
aAdjusted for age
AUCs, cut-off points and sensitivity/specificity of anthropometric measurements predicting dyslipidemia in Chinese boys (2011–2012)
| AUCs (95 % CI) | Cut-off points | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | ORa | Adjusted ORb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | ||||||
| BMI z-score | 0.66 (0.57–0.75) | 0.973 | 59.6 | 73.2 | 1.88 (1.38–2.61) | 2.08 (1.36–3.25) |
| WHR | 0.73 (0.66–0.80) | 0.862 | 70.2 | 70.3 | 1.50 (1.21–1.89) | 1.81 (1.34–2.48) |
| WHtR | 0.72 (0.65–0.80) | 0.473 | 59.6 | 76.6 | 1.89 (1.46–2.47) | 2.20 (1.52–3.27) |
| MaHtR | 0.67 (0.59–0.76) | 0.159 | 57.4 | 77.5 | 1.76 (1.32–2.37) | 2.10 (1.37–3.28) |
| Urban area | ||||||
| BMI z-score | 0.64 (0.54–0.74) | 1.309 | 57.5 | 74.2 | 1.85 (1.28–2.71) | 1.91 (1.12–3.36) |
| WHR | 0.68 (0.60–0.76) | 0.836 | 82.5 | 50.7 | 1.34 (1.08–1.69) | 1.47 (1.04–2.09) |
| WHtR | 0.69 (0.60–0.77) | 0.473 | 60.0 | 72.0 | 1.74 (1.31–2.32) | 1.87 (1.20–3.00) |
| MaHtR | 0.65 (0.55–0.75) | 0.159 | 62.5 | 72.0 | 1.62 (1.16–2.27) | 1.70 (0.99–3.01) |
| Rural area | ||||||
| BMI z-score | 0.68 (0.40–0.97) | −0.422 | 71.4 | 76.3 | 2.18 (0.98–5.03) | 2.64 (1.07–8.00) |
| WHR | 0.94 (0.88–1.00) | 0.864 | 100 | 81.3 | 5.90 (2.29–21.68) | 5.27 (1.74–26.71) |
| WHtR | 0.87 (0.73–1.00) | 0.459 | 85.7 | 85.0 | 3.13 (1.47–8.00) | 2.78 (1.20–9.11) |
| MaHtR | 0.77 (0.53–1.00) | 0.145 | 57.1 | 93.8 | 3.47 (1.45–8.96) | 4.43 (1.45–22.43) |
AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, WC waist circumference, BMI body mass index, WHR waist-hip ratio, WHtR waist-height ratio, MaHtR mid-upper arm height ratio
aOR was calculated by every increase of approximately one standard deviation of anthropometric measurements (1.5 for BMI z-score, 0.05 for WHR and WHtR, 0.02 for MHR)
bAdjusted for age, energy intake, total physical activity, nutraceutical use, living area, and family income