| Literature DB >> 27128931 |
Shan Zheng1, Minzhen Wang2, Bei Li3, Shigong Wang4,5, Shilin He6, Ling Yin7, Kezheng Shang8, Tanshi Li9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diurnal temperature range (DTR) is an important index of climate change and variability. It is also a risk factor affecting human health. However, limited evidence is available to illustrate the effect of DTR modification on cause-specific cardiovascular disease among the elderly.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; cerebrovascular disease; diurnal temperature range; elderly; emergency room admission; hypertensive disease; ischemic heart disease; modifiers
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27128931 PMCID: PMC4881072 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13050447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Distribution of daily ER admissions for cause-specific cardiovascular disease among the elderly in Beijing (2009–2011).
| Cause-Specific Cardiovascular | Group | Number | Mean | SD | Min. | P25 | P50 | P75 | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All cardiovascular disease | Total | 22069 | 20.15 | 6.23 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 24 | 43 |
| Male | 11049 | 10.09 | 3.66 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 13 | 24 | |
| Female | 11020 | 10.06 | 4.02 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 24 | |
| 65–74 | 9814 | 8.96 | 3.53 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 23 | |
| ≥75 | 12255 | 11.19 | 4.27 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 26 | |
| Hypertensive disease | Total | 6051 | 5.53 | 2.81 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 14 |
| Male | 2601 | 2.38 | 1.67 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Female | 3450 | 3.15 | 2.02 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 13 | |
| 65–74 | 2847 | 2.60 | 1.81 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | |
| Ischemic heart disease | ≥75 | 3204 | 2.93 | 1.89 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Total | 6735 | 6.15 | 3.16 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 19 | |
| Male | 3291 | 3.01 | 2.01 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 14 | |
| Female | 3444 | 3.15 | 2.07 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| 65–74 | 2871 | 2.62 | 1.87 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | |
| ≥75 | 3864 | 3.53 | 2.16 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
| Cerebrovascular disease | Total | 8202 | 7.49 | 3.20 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 21 |
| Male | 4342 | 3.97 | 2.14 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 15 | |
| Female | 3860 | 3.53 | 2.09 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | |
| 65–74 | 3790 | 3.46 | 2.02 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
| ≥75 | 4412 | 4.03 | 2.32 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 14 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation: Px, xth percentiles; Min., minimum; Max., maximum.
Summary statistics of daily meteorological factors and air pollution concentrations in Beijing (2009–2011).
| Daily Data | Mean | SD | Min. | P25 | P50 | P75 | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meteorological factors | |||||||
| DTR (°C) | 9.85 | 3.58 | 1.10 | 7.30 | 9.70 | 12.10 | 21.90 |
| In warm season | 9.89 | 3.53 | 2.10 | 7.40 | 9.70 | 12.00 | 21.90 |
| In cold season | 9.81 | 3.62 | 1.10 | 7.00 | 9.80 | 12.10 | 21.10 |
| Mean temperature (°C) | 13.15 | 11.54 | −12.50 | 1.80 | 14.90 | 24.20 | 34.50 |
| Relative humidity (%) | 50.38 | 19.79 | 9.00 | 33.00 | 51.00 | 67.00 | 92.00 |
| Mean wind speed (m/s) | 2.23 | 0.94 | 0.50 | 1.50 | 2.10 | 2.70 | 6.40 |
| Atmospheric pressure (hpa) | 1012.38 | 10.25 | 989.70 | 1004.10 | 1011.80 | 1020.60 | 1037.30 |
| Air pollutant concentrations | |||||||
| PM10 (μg/m3) | 110.16 | 63.28 | 11.00 | 58.00 | 104.00 | 152.00 | 544.00 |
| SO2 (μg/m3) | 28.07 | 28.39 | 5.00 | 9.00 | 18.00 | 35.00 | 234.50 |
| NO2 (μg/m3) | 51.88 | 23.60 | 11.20 | 35.20 | 46.40 | 62.40 | 241.60 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation: Px, xth percentiles; Min., minimum; Max., maximum.
Percent change (mean and 95% CI) of the elderly ER admissions associated with a 1 °C variation in DTR by gender in Beijing during 2009–2011 a.
| Gender | Lag | All Cardiovascular Disease | Hypertensive Disease | Ischemic Heart Disease | Cerebrovascular Disease |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Single-day lag | ||||
| 0 | 0.36 (−0.23~0.95) | −0.46 (−1.61~0.70) | −0.14 (−1.23~0.96) | 0.81 (−0.08~1.70) | |
| 1 | 0.42 (−0.18~1.03) | 0.16 (−1.04~1.38) | 0.88 (−0.24~2.01) | 0.61 (−0.32~1.54) | |
| 2 | 0.41 (−0.18~1.00) | 0.19 (−0.99~1.39) | 0.82 (−0.26~1.91) | 0.49 (−0.41~1.40) | |
| 3 | 0.39 (−0.18~0.96) | 0.40 (−0.75~1.57) | 0.78 (−0.26~1.84) | 0.87 (−0.01~1.76) | |
| 4 | 0.26 (−0.30~0.82) | 0.63 (−0.50~1.78) | 0.00 (−1.02~1.03) | 0.41 (−0.46~1.29) | |
| Cumulative-day lag | |||||
| 01 | 0.61 (−0.13~1.36) | −0.25 (−1.68~1.21) | 0.57 (−0.81~1.96) | 1.08 (−0.02~2.19) | |
| 02 | 0.86 (−0.01~1.73) | −0.09 (−1.75~1.60) | 1.12 (−0.49~2.75) | ||
| 03 | 0.19 (−1.64~2.06) | 1.56 (−0.20~3.35) | |||
| 04 | 0.59 (−1.39~2.62) | 1.43 (−0.45~3.34) | |||
| Female | Single-day lag | ||||
| 0 | 0.83 (−0.15~1.83) | ||||
| 1 | 0.23 (−0.85~1.33) | 0.79 (−0.28~1.86) | |||
| 2 | 0.14 (−0.45~0.73) | 0.08 (−0.97~1.13) | 0.47 (−0.57~1.52) | 0.24 (−0.73~1.22) | |
| 3 | −0.27 (−0.84~0.30) | −0.33 (−1.34~0.69) | −0.38 (−1.39~0.64) | 0.18 (−0.77~1.13) | |
| 4 | −0.07 (−0.63~0.49) | −0.22 (−1.21~0.79) | −0.24 (−1.24~0.77) | −0.21 (−1.15~0.73) | |
| Cumulative-day lag | |||||
| 01 | 0.68 (−0.67~2.05) | ||||
| 02 | 0.66 (−0.91~2.26) | ||||
| 03 | 0.35 (−1.37~2.10) | 1.30 (−0.34~2.97) | |||
| 04 | 0.99 (−0.03~2.02) | 0.16 (−1.69~2.04) | 1.06 (−0.70~2.85) | 1.29 (−0.31~2.92) | |
The effects of DTR were estimated by core model. All models controlled for time trend, DOW, holiday, weather conditions and air pollutants. Statistically significant effect estimates were bolded.
Figure 1Smoothing plots of DTR against the elderly ER admissions risk of cause-specific cardiovascular disease. X-axis is DTR (°C). The solid lines indicate the estimated mean percentage of change in daily ER admission, and the dotted lines represent twice the standard error. (A,B) The relationship between DTR and all cardiovascular disease (L04 day), cerebrovascular disease (L04 day) ER admissions among males; (C–E) The relationship between DTR and all cardiovascular disease (L01 day), ischemic heart disease (L02 day) and cerebrovascular disease (L02 day) ER admissions among females. Models controlled for time trend, DOW, holiday, mean temperature, humidity, wind, atmospheric pressure and air pollutant concentrations.
Percent change (mean and 95% CI) of the elderly ER admissions associated with a 1 °C variation in DTR by age group among males and females in Beijing during 2009–2011 a,b.
| Group | All Cardiovascular Disease | Hypertensive Disease | Ischemic Heart Disease | Cerebrovascular Disease |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | ||||
| 65–74 | 1.33 (−0.24~2.92) | 0.88 (−0.85~2.64) | 1.08 (−1.47~3.70) | 1.10 (−1.28~3.54) |
| ≥75 | 0.65 (−0.85~2.17) | 2.17 (−0.04~4.44) | ||
| Female | ||||
| 65–74 | 0.74 (−0.29~1.78) | 0.22 (−1.15~1.61) | 1.84 (−0.22~3.94) | 0.22 (−1.42~1.90) |
| ≥75 | ||||
The effects of DTR were estimated by core model. All models controlled for time trend, DOW, holiday, weather conditions and air pollutants. Statistically significant effect estimates were bolded; b The greatest effects of cumulative-day lag (L04, L03 and L04) DTR and single-day lag 4 (L4) DTR were used for all cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and hypertensive disease ER admissions in males; cumulative-day lag (L01, L02 and L02) DTR and single-day lag 0 (L0) DTR were used for all cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and hypertensive disease ER admissions in females; * Differences between 65–74 years and ≥75 years in the same gender group, p < 0.05.
Figure A1Smoothing plots of DTR against the ER admissions risk of cause-specific cardiovascular disease in the age group 75 years and over. (a,b) The relationship between DTR and all cardiovascular disease (L04 day) and cerebrovascular disease (L04 day) ER admissions among males aged 75 years and over; (c–f) the relationship between DTR and all cardiovascular disease (L01 day), hypertensive disease (L0 day), ischemic heart disease (L02 day) and cerebrovascular disease (L02 day) ER admissions among females aged 75 years and over. Models were controlled for time trend, DOW, holiday, mean temperature, humidity, wind, atmospheric pressure and air pollutant concentrations.
Percent change (mean and 95% CI) of the elderly ER admissions associated with a 1°C variation in DTR by season among males and females in Beijing during 2009–2011 a,b.
| Season c | All Cardiovascular Disease | Hypertensive Disease | Ischemic Heart Disease | Cerebrovascular Disease |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warm season | ||||
| Male | 1.21 (−0.11~2.54) | −0.03 (−1.65~1.62) | 1.65 (−0.61~3.95) | |
| ≥75 | −0.13 (−2.28~2.07) | 2.67 (−0.19~5.61) | ||
| Female | −0.13 (−1.62~1.38) | 1.15 (−0.80~3.13) | ||
| ≥75 | 0.87 (−1.11~2.90) | 1.10 (−1.13~3.38) | ||
| Cold season | ||||
| Male | 1.07 (−0.38~2.55) | 1.14 (−0.42~2.72) | 1.67 (−0.79~4.19) | 0.07 (−2.07~2.27) |
| ≥75 | 0.98 (−0.89~2.87) | 1.24 (−0.82~3.34) | 1.85 (−1.26~5.05) | 0.36 (−2.63~3.43) |
| Female | 1.28 (−0.16~2.75) | 0.42 (−1.59~2.47) | ||
| ≥75 | 2.55 (−0.40~5.59) | |||
The effects of DTR were estimated by core model. All models controlled for time trend, DOW, holiday, weather conditions and air pollutants. Statistically significant effect estimates were bolded; b The greatest effects of cumulative-day lag (L04, L03 and L04) DTR and single-day lag 4 (L4) DTR were used for all cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and hypertensive disease ER admissions in males; cumulative-day lag (L01, L02 and L02) DTR and single-day lag 0(L0) DTR were used for all cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and hypertensive disease ER admissions in females; c Product term of a DTR and season (binary variables for cold season and warm season) was added to the core model; * Differences between warm season and cold season in the same gender and age group, p < 0.05.
Percent increase (mean and 95% CI) of the elderly ER admissions for 1 °C increase of DTR before and after adjustment for covariates a,b.
| Covariates | All Cardiovascular Disease | Hypertensive Disease | Ischemic Heart Disease | Cerebrovascular Disease |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | ||||
| None | 1.05 (−0.07~2.18) | 1.46 (−0.08~3.02) | ||
| T | 0.57 (−0.56~1.71) | 1.18 (−0.49~2.89) | ||
| T + RH + W + P | 0.65 (−0.48~1.80) | 1.25 (−0.42~2.95) | ||
| T + RH + W + P + Z | 0.63 (−0.50~1.78) | 1.56 (−0.20~3.35) | ||
| Female | ||||
| None | 0.49 (−0.49~1.49) | |||
| T | 0.65 (−0.39~1.69) | |||
| T + RH + W + P | 0.68 (−0.28~1.66) | |||
| T + RH + W + P + Z | 0.83 (−0.15~1.83) |
The effects of DTR were estimated by GAM model. All models controlled for time trend, DOW, holiday. Statistically significant effect estimates were bolded; b The greatest effects of cumulative-day lag (L04, L03 and L04) DTR and single-day lag 4 (L4) DTR were used for all cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and hypertensive disease ER admissions in males; cumulative-day lag (L01, L02 and L02) DTR and single-day lag 0 (L0) DTR were used for all cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and hypertensive disease ER admissions in females. Abbreviations: T, mean temperature, RH, relative humidity, W, mean wind speed, P, atmospheric pressure, Z, air pollutants (PM10, NO2 and SO2).
Percent increase (mean and 95% CI) of the elderly ER admissions with a 1 °C variation in mean temperature and a 10-μg/m3 increase in air pollutant concentrations by gender in Beijing during 2009–2011 a.
| Covariates | All Cardiovascular Disease | Hypertensive Disease | Ischemic Heart Disease | Cerebrovascular Disease |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | ||||
| Temperature b | −0.21 (1.06~0.65) | −0.13 (−0.78~0.52) | ||
| PM10 c | 0.08 (−0.27~0.44) | 0.16 (−0.52~0.84) | −0.56 (−1.23~0.11) | −0.09 (−0.62~0.44) |
| NO2 c | 0.55 (−0.58~1.68) | 0.37 (−1.73~2.52) | −1.16 (−3.22~0.95) | 0.42 (−1.21~2.08) |
| SO2 c | 0.19 (−0.91~1.30) | 0.21 (−1.78~2.24) | −0.70 (−2.70~1.34) | −0.22 (−1.84~1.42) |
| Female | ||||
| Temperature b | 0.49 (−0.31~1.30) | −0.58 (−1.30~0.14) | 0.37 (−0.61~1.36) | 0.40 (−0.29~1.09) |
| PM10c | 0.44 (−0.14~1.03) | 0.01 (−0.60~0.63) | 0.52 (−0.03~1.08) | |
| NO2c | 0.33 (−1.49~2.19) | 0.52 (−1.37~2.45) | ||
| SO2c | 0.64 (−0.42~1.72) | −0.55 (−2.31~1.23) | −0.05 (−1.92~1.85) |
The effects were estimated by GAM model. We used current day mean temperature, humidity, wind, pressure and pollutant concentrations (lag 0). Statistically significant effect estimates were bolded; b All models controlled for the time trend, DOW, holiday, humidity, wind, pressure and air pollutants; c All models were controlled for the time trend, DOW, holiday, mean temperature, humidity, wind, pressure.