| Literature DB >> 27128444 |
María G Alvarez1, Graciela L Bertocchi1, Gretchen Cooley2, María C Albareda3, Rodolfo Viotti1, Damián E Perez-Mazliah3, Bruno Lococo1, Melisa Castro Eiro3, Susana A Laucella1,3, Rick L Tarleton2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is the highest impact parasitic disease in Latin America. We have proposed that changes in Trypanosoma cruzi-specific immune responses might serve as surrogate indicators of treatment success. Herein, we addressed in a long-term follow-up study whether cure achieved after treatment can be predicted by changes in non-conventional indexes of anti-parasite serological and T cell activities. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27128444 PMCID: PMC4851297 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004657
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Changes in IFN-γ ELISPOT T cell responses specific for T. cruzi antigens in long-term follow-up of chronic Chagas disease patients treated with benznidazole.
| Patient group | N | Clinical stage | IFN-γ-ELISPOT responses | IFN-γ-ELISPOT responses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at 36 months post-treatment | 48–72 months post treatment | ||||
| G0 | G1 | relative to pretreatment | |||
| 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | Became undetectable | Rebound |
| 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | Decreased | Unchanged |
| 3 | 5 | 4 | 1 | Became detectable | Unchanged |
| 4 | 8 | 7 | 1 | Unchanged | Unchanged |
Note. A Ages are not significant different among groups.
B IFN-γ-producing T cells are undetectable prior to treatment and became detectable following treatment.
Fig 1Monitoring of IFN-γ and IL-2 production in subjects with chronic Chagas disease and treated with benznidazole.
IFN-γ– or IL-2-producing T cells were measured at different time points after benznidazole treatment or enrollment (for untreated subjects). Plots exhibit representative data for single subjects with different kinetics of T cell responses after benznidazole-treatment. Time 0 indicates the assay point just prior to benznidazole treatment. A) Parasite-specific T cell responses became undetectable after treatment and show a rebound thereafter. B) Parasite-specific T cell responses decreased after treatment. C) Previously undetectable cytokine-producing T cells prior to treatment became detectable after treatment. D) The frequencies of cytokine-producing T cells did not change relative to pretreatment. E) Monitoring of T cell responses in untreated subjects.
Evolution of Trypanosoma cruzi-specific humoral immune responses according to changes in T cell responses during long-term follow-up of benznidazole-treated subjects.
| Patient group | ELISPOT responses(from | Changes in Serology | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELISA | IHA | IFI | No of subjects with seroconversion/total evaluated (%) | Multiplex serology (%) | Months of follow-up (range) | ||
| 1 | Rebound | 0.0015 | 0.0052 | NS | 2/12 (17) | 11/12 (92) | 65–150 |
| 2 | Decreased | 0.0205 | 0.0072 | NS | 5/8 (63) | 6/7 (86) | 48–132 |
| 3 | Became detectable | NS | NS | NS | 0/5 | 2/5 (40) | 80–137 |
| 4 | Unchanged | NS | NS | NS | 0/8 | 2/8 (25) | 48–96 |
A No. of subjects with negative findings postreatment for 2 out of 3 or 3 out 3 conventional serological tests.
B No. of subjects/total evaluated with a 50% decrease in mean florescence intensity for > 1 recombinant Trypanosoma cruzi protein in the14-protein multiplex panel.
C P, antibody titers post-treatment compared with pretreatment values, by the Mann Whitney U test
D P < 0.05 compared with group 4, by the Fisher exact test.
E P < 0.01 compared with group 4, by the Fisher exact test.
F P < 0.05 compared with group 4, by the Fisher exact test.
(*) No sample available for one patient.
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IHA, indirect hemagglutination; IFI, indirect immunofluorescence; NS, no significant change relative to pretreatment values.
Fig 2Evolution of T. cruzi-specific humoral responses in relation to changes in T cell responses after treatment with benznidazole.
T. cruzi-specific humoral responses were measured at different time points after benznidazole treatment. by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect hemagglutination (IHA) and indirect immunofluorescence (IFI). Each panel exhibits representative humoral responses for single patients with different kinetics of IFN-γ producing T cells after benznidazole treatment. A) Parasite-specific T cell responses became undetectable after treatment and experienced a rebound thereafter. B) Parasite-specific T cell responses decreased after treatment. C) Undetectable cytokine-producing T cells prior to treatment became detectable after treatment. D) The frequencies of cytokine-producing T cells did not change relative to pretreatmentTime 0 indicates the assay point just prior to benznidazole treatment. Broken lines indicate the cut-off value for ELISA assays; full lines indicate the cut-off value for IHA and IFI assays.
Fig 3Multiplex serological analysis of T. cruzi-specific antibodies after long-term follow-up of chronic Chagas disease patients treated with benznidazole.
Serum specimens obtained at the indicated time points were screened using a bead array-based multiplex serological assay with recombinant T. cruzi proteins, as described in Material and Methods. (A-D) Representative examples of the monitoring of T. cruzi-specific antibodies by the multiplex assay in subjects in which T. cruzi-specific IFN-γ-producing T cells became undetectable after treatment and show a rebound thereafter. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for reactive proteins is shown. Time 0 indicates the assay point just prior to benznidazole treatment. (*) Indicates a decrease in MFI higher than fifty percent compared with pre-treatment values.
Fig 4Levels of pre-therapy IFN-γ-or IL-2 secreting T cells in relation to the evolution to T. cruzi-specific humoral responses in Chagas disease patients treated with benznidazole.
Treated subjects were grouped as those with stable or declining T. cruzi-specific antibodies post-treatment as measured by conventional serological tests and multiplex assays. Each dot represents the mean IFN-γ (A) and IL-2 (B) spot number of triplicate wells for each patient sample assessed. Spot counts with media alone were subtracted from T. cruzi–antigen stimulated spot numbers. Horizontal lines depict median values. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Fig 5Longitudinal assessment of the functional capacity of CD4+ T cells responsive to T. cruzi antigens in chronic Chagas disease patients treated with benznidazole.
PBMCs were stimulated with a T. cruzi lysate preparation or media alone and the expression of interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and CD154 was determined by polychromatic flow cytometry. (A) Lymphocytes were gated based on forward scattering (FSC) and side scatter (SSC), and CD4 T cells were then analyzed for IFN-, IL-2, and TNF-expression. Cytokine co-expression profiles were determined using the Boolean gating function of FlowJo software. Representative examples of four patients, PP43 (B); PP104 (C), PP117 (D) and PP555 (E) with rebound IFN-γ responses after treatment with benznidazole. Pies show the fraction of the total response that consist of CD4+ T cells positive for the different T cell subsets at different time points post treatment. (*) Indicates positive IFN-γ ELISPOT responses prior to treatment. (I) IFN-γ; (T), TNF-α; (D), CD154.