Literature DB >> 27128255

Does Greater Body Mass Index Increase the Risk for Revision Procedures Following a Single-Level Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy?

Daniel D Bohl1, Junyoung Ahn, Benjamin C Mayo, Dustin H Massel, Ehsan Tabaraee, Robert A Sershon, Bryce A Basques, Kern Singh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained surgical registry.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and the risk for undergoing a revision procedure following a single-level minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar discectomy (LD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies conflict as to whether greater BMI contributes to recurrent herniation and the need for revision procedures following LD. Patients and surgeons would benefit from knowing whether greater BMI is a risk factor to guide the decision whether to pursue an operative versus non-operative treatment.
METHODS: Patients undergoing a single-level MIS LD were retrospectively identified in our institution's prospectively maintained surgical registry. BMI was categorized as normal weight (<25 kg/m), overweight (25-30 kg/m), obese (30-40 kg/m), or morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m). Multivariate analysis was used to test for association with undergoing a revision procedure during the first 2 postoperative years. The model was demographics, comorbidities, and operative level.
RESULTS: A total of 226 patients were identified. Of these, 56 (24.8%) were normal weight, 80 (35.4%) were overweight, 66 (29.2%) were obese, and 24 (10.6%) were morbidly obese. A total of 23 patients (10.2%) underwent a revision procedure in the first 2 postoperative years. The 2-year risk for revision procedure was 1.8% for normal weight patients, 12.5% for overweight patients, 9.1% for obese patients, and 25.0% for morbidly obese patients. In the multivariate-adjusted analysis model, BMI category was independently associated with undergoing a revision procedure (P = 0.038).
CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that greater BMI is an independent risk factor for undergoing a revision procedure following a LD. These findings conflict with recent studies that have found no difference between obese and non-obese patients in regards to risk for recurrent herniation and/or revision procedures. Patients with greater BMI undergoing LD should be informed they could have an elevated risk for revision procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27128255     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

Review 1.  Complexities of spine surgery in obese patient populations: a narrative review.

Authors:  Gennadiy A Katsevman; Scott D Daffner; Nicholas J Brandmeir; Sanford E Emery; John C France; Cara L Sedney
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Comparison of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Guang-Xun Lin; Gang Rui; Chien-Min Chen; Vit Kotheeranurak; Hua-Jian Wu; Huang-Lin Zhang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Obesity and Spine Surgery: A Qualitative Review About Outcomes and Complications. Is It Time for New Perspectives on Future Researches?

Authors:  Fabio Cofano; Giuseppe Di Perna; Daria Bongiovanni; Vittoria Roscigno; Bianca Maria Baldassarre; Salvatore Petrone; Fulvio Tartara; Diego Garbossa; Marco Bozzaro
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-06-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.