| Literature DB >> 27127573 |
Mansour Moghimi1, Pouria Yazdian Anari2, Marzie Vaghefi2, Abbas Meidany2, Heidar Salehi2.
Abstract
Nodular fasciitis of the breast is a rare benign pathology of soft tissue that is a consequence of fibroblastic hyperplasia within breast. It can mimic breast cancer clinically, radiologically, and histopathologically. A-43 year-old female with a painless mass within upper-lateral quadrant of her left breast complained of rapid and progressive growth during previous few days. No evidence of nipple discharge or sensation of pain was expressed. The mass was tender to palpation, but the size was too tiny to detect. The definitive diagnosis was established with sonography, which detected a hypoechogenic lesion, 10 mm in diameter. The excisional biopsy delivered a tissue composed of fusiform fibroblastic cells with bright ellipsoid-like nuclei and elevated nucleolus. Mitotic formations were also obvious. Low cellular and high cellular zones with hyaline fibrosis and erythrocyte accumulation existed, as well as a light lymphocytic infiltration. All of these features, in addition to adipocytic accumulation within the margins of this lesion, suggested a definitive diagnosis of Nodular fasciitis. The diagnosis of nodular fasciitis is difficult and often is indiscriminable from breast cancer, so paying close attention to this matter is critical.Entities:
Keywords: Nodular Fasciitis; Pathology; Ultrasonography
Year: 2016 PMID: 27127573 PMCID: PMC4841891 DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.18774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Radiol ISSN: 1735-1065 Impact factor: 0.212
Figure 1.A 43 year-old woman with a mass in upper-lateral quadrant of left breast. Breast sonography shows a hypoechoic mass.
Figure 2.BIRADS category 4 in mammography of the left breast (mass is marked in the mammography)
Figure 3.Microscopic appearance of the mass (H&E staining, ×10)
Figure 4.Microscopic appearance of the mass (H&E staining, ×40)
Summary of Different Cases
| Case | Reference | Year | Age/Gender | Size | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Kontogeorgos et al. ( | 1988 | - | - | Excised |
|
| B. Maly and A. Maly ( | 2001 | 15-year-old woman | 2 | Excised |
|
| Dahlstrom et al. ( | 2001 | 38-year-old woman | 1.2 | Excised |
|
| Polat et al. ( | 2002 | 66-year-old woman | - | Excised |
|
| Tulbah et al. ( | 2003 | 18-year-old woman | - | Excised |
|
| Brown and Carty ( | 2003 | 65-year-old woman | 5.5 | observed |
|
| Porter et al. ( | 2006 | 75-year-old woman | - | - |
|
| Porter et al. ( | 2006 | 52-year-old woman | - | - |
|
| Hayashi et al. ( | 2007 | 41 -year-old woman | 1.5 | Excised |
|
| Squillaci et al. ( | 2007 | 40-year-old woman | 3.5 | Excised |
|
| Yamamoto et al. ( | 2009 | 18-year-old woman | 0.8 | Excised |
|
| Hayashi et al. ( | 2012 | 25-year-old woman | 0.5 | Excised |
|
| Paker et al. ( | 2013 | 17-year-old woman | 1.5 | Excised |
|
| Son et al. ( | 2013 | 41-year-old woman | 1.1 | Excised |
|
| Kakimoto et al. ( | 2014 | 78-year-old woman | 1.5 | Excised |
|
| Samardzic et al. ( | 2014 | 68-year-old woman | 4 | Excised |
|
| Yamamoto S. et al. ( | 2014 | 35-year-old woman | 3.5 | Excised |
|
| Choi et al. ( | 2014 | 35-year-old woman | 1.5 | Excised |
|
| Rhee et al. ( | 2014 | - | - | - |