Literature DB >> 27127006

Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: Implementation and Expansion of the RANO Criteria in a Randomized Phase II Trial of Pediatric Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas.

T Jaspan1, P S Morgan2, M Warmuth-Metz3, E Sanchez Aliaga4, D Warren5, R Calmon6, J Grill7, D Hargrave8, J Garcia9, G Zahlmann9.   

Abstract

Determination of tumor response to treatment in neuro-oncology is challenging, particularly when antiangiogenic agents are considered. Nontumoral factors (eg, blood-brain barrier disruption, edema, and necrosis) can alter contrast enhancement independent of true tumor response/progression. Furthermore, gliomas are often infiltrative, with nonenhancing components. In adults, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria attempted to address these issues. No such guidelines exist yet for children. The ongoing randomized phase II trial, A Study of Avastin (bevacizumab) in Combination With Temolozomide (TMZ) and Radiotherapy in Paediatric and Adolescent Patients With High-Grade Glioma (HERBY), will establish the efficacy and safety of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab for the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma in children (n = 121 patients, enrollment complete). The primary end point is event-free survival (tumor progression/recurrence by central review, second primary malignancy, or death). Determination of progression or response is based on predefined clinical and radiographic criteria, modeled on the RANO criteria and supported by expert pseudoprogression review and the use of standardized imaging protocols. The HERBY trial will also compare conventional MR imaging (T1-weighted and T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences) with conventional MR imaging plus diffusion/perfusion imaging for response assessment. It is anticipated that HERBY will provide new insights into antiangiogenic-treated pediatric brain tumors. HERBY will also investigate the practicality of obtaining adequate quality diffusion/perfusion scans in a trial setting, and the feasibility of implementing standard imaging protocols across multiple sites. To date, 61/73 (83.6%) patients with available data have completed diffusion-weighted imaging (uptake of other nonconventional techniques has been limited). Harmonization of imaging protocols and techniques may improve the robustness of pediatric neuro-oncology studies and aid future trial comparability.
© 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27127006      PMCID: PMC7984693          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  19 in total

1.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Martin Bendszus; Jerrold Boxerman; Daniel Barboriak; Bradley J Erickson; Marion Smits; Sarah J Nelson; Elizabeth Gerstner; Brian Alexander; Gregory Goldmacher; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Vogelbaum; Michael Weller; Evanthia Galanis; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Lalitha Shankar; Paula Jacobs; Whitney B Pope; Dewen Yang; Caroline Chung; Michael V Knopp; Soonme Cha; Martin J van den Bent; Susan Chang; W K Al Yung; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Changes in serial magnetic resonance spectroscopy predict outcome in high-grade glioma during and after postoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Harvey Quon; Bryan Brunet; Abraham Alexander; Albert Murtha; Bassam Abdulkarim; Dorcas Fulton; Marie Smerdely; Maryann Johnson; Raul Urtasun; Samir Patel; Sunita Ghosh; Wilson Roa
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Survival analysis in patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma multiforme using pre- and post-treatment peritumoral perfusion imaging parameters.

Authors:  Asim K Bag; Phillip C Cezayirli; Jake J Davenport; Santhosh Gaddikeri; Hassan M Fathallah-Shaykh; Alan Cantor; Xiaosi S Han; Louis B Nabors
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.

Authors:  Morad Nasseri; Seymur Gahramanov; Joao Prola Netto; Rongwei Fu; Leslie L Muldoon; Csanad Varallyay; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Analysis of the layering pattern of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumour progression.

Authors:  Jihoon Cha; Sung Tae Kim; Hyung-Jin Kim; Hye Jeong Kim; Byung-Joon Kim; Pyoung Jeon; Keon Ha Kim; Hong Sik Byun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Morphological and functional MRI, MRS, perfusion and diffusion changes after radiosurgery of brain metastasis.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kang; Sung Tae Kim; Hong Sik Byun; Pyoung Jeon; Keonha Kim; Hyungjin Kim; Jung Ii Lee
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab: contrast-enhanced T1-weighted subtraction maps improve tumor delineation and aid prediction of survival in a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Hyun J Kim; Davis C Woodworth; Whitney B Pope; Jonathan N Cloughesy; Robert J Harris; Albert Lai; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Response assessment criteria for glioblastoma: practical adaptation and implementation in clinical trials of antiangiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Olivier L Chinot; David R Macdonald; Lauren E Abrey; Gudrun Zahlmann; Yannick Kerloëguen; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the diagnosis of paediatric low grade brain tumours.

Authors:  E Orphanidou-Vlachou; D Auer; M A Brundler; N P Davies; T Jaspan; L MacPherson; K Natarajan; Y Sun; T N Arvanitis; R G Grundy; A C Peet
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Advanced MRI Techniques in the Monitoring of Treatment of Gliomas.

Authors:  Harpreet Hyare; Steffi Thust; Jeremy Rees
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Consensus recommendations on standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols for multicenter canine brain tumor clinical trials.

Authors:  Rebecca A Packer; John H Rossmeisl; Michael S Kent; John F Griffin; Christina Mazcko; Amy K LeBlanc
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 1.363

Review 3.  Current concepts in radiologic assessment of pediatric brain tumors during treatment, part 1.

Authors:  Felice D'Arco; Sinead Culleton; Laurens J L De Cocker; Kshitij Mankad; Jorge Davila; Benita Tamrazi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-07-06

4.  Object Detection Improves Tumour Segmentation in MR Images of Rare Brain Tumours.

Authors:  Hamza Chegraoui; Cathy Philippe; Volodia Dangouloff-Ros; Antoine Grigis; Raphael Calmon; Nathalie Boddaert; Frédérique Frouin; Jacques Grill; Vincent Frouin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Volumetric assessment of tumor size changes in pediatric low-grade gliomas: feasibility and comparison with linear measurements.

Authors:  Felice D'Arco; Patricia O'Hare; Fatima Dashti; Alvaro Lassaletta; Thalia Loka; Uri Tabori; Giacomo Talenti; Stefanie Thust; Giancarlo Messalli; Patrick Hales; Eric Bouffet; Suzanne Laughlin
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  A phase I/II study of gemcitabine during radiotherapy in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Authors:  Sophie E M Veldhuijzen van Zanten; Fatma E El-Khouly; Marc H A Jansen; Dewi P Bakker; Esther Sanchez Aliaga; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Nicole I Wolf; C Michel Zwaan; W Peter Vandertop; Dannis G van Vuurden; Gertjan J L Kaspers
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Evaluation of the Response of Intracranial Xenografts to VEGF Signaling Inhibition Using Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Jessica K R Boult; Gary Box; Maria Vinci; Lara Perryman; Suzanne A Eccles; Chris Jones; Simon P Robinson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 8.  A comprehensive approach in high-grade glioma management: position statement from the Neuro-Oncology Scientific Club (NOSC), Shiraz, Iran.

Authors:  Mansour Ansari; Ahmad Mosalaei; Niloufar Ahmadloo; Alireza Rasekhi; Bita Geramizadeh; Ali Razmkon; Kazem Anvari; Mohammad Afarid; Ali Dadras; Leila Nafarieh; Mohammad Mohammadianpanah; Hamid Nasrolahi; Seyed Hasan Hamedi; Shapour Omidvari; Mohammad Nami
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-28

9.  A phase I/II study of bevacizumab, irinotecan and erlotinib in children with progressive diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Authors:  Fatma E El-Khouly; Sophie E M Veldhuijzen van Zanten; Dannis G van Vuurden; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Marc H A Jansen; Dewi P Bakker; Esther Sanchez Aliaga; N Harry Hendrikse; W Peter Vandertop
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients.

Authors:  Jiwook Lee; Sung Hyun Park; Young Zoon Kim
Journal:  Brain Tumor Res Treat       Date:  2018-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.