Literature DB >> 27126459

Short inter-set rest blunts resistance exercise-induced increases in myofibrillar protein synthesis and intracellular signalling in young males.

James McKendry1,2, Alberto Pérez-López1,3, Michael McLeod1,2, Dan Luo1,2, Jessica R Dent1,2, Benoit Smeuninx1,2, Jinglei Yu1, Angela E Taylor4, Andrew Philp1,2, Leigh Breen1,2.   

Abstract

What is the central question of this study? Does shorter rest between sets of resistance exercise promote a superior circulating hormonal and acute muscle anabolic response compared with longer rest periods? What is the main finding and its importance? We demonstrate that short rest (1 min) between sets of moderate-intensity, high-volume resistance exercise blunts the acute muscle anabolic response compared with a longer rest period (5 min), despite a superior circulating hormonal milieu. These data have important implications for the development of training regimens to maximize muscle hypertrophy. Manipulating the rest-recovery interval between sets of resistance exercise may influence training-induced muscle remodelling. The aim of this study was to determine the acute muscle anabolic response to resistance exercise performed with short or long inter-set rest intervals. In a study with a parallel-group design, 16 males completed four sets of bilateral leg-press and knee-extension exercise at 75% of one-repetition maximum to momentary muscular failure, followed by ingestion of 25 g of whey protein. Resistance exercise sets were interspersed by 1 min (n = 8) or 5 min of passive rest (n = 8). Muscle biopsies were obtained at rest, 0, 4, 24 and 28 h postexercise during a primed continuous infusion of l-[ring-(13) C6 ]phenylalanine to determine myofibrillar protein synthesis and intracellular signalling. We found that the rate of myofibrillar protein synthesis increased above resting values from 0 to 4 h postexercise with 1 (76%; P = 0.047) and 5 min inter-set rest (152%; P < 0.001) and was significantly greater in the 5 min inter-set rest group (P = 0.001). Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates at 24-28 h postexercise remained elevated above resting values (P < 0.05) and were indistinguishable between groups. Postexercise p70S6K(Thr389) and rpS6(Ser240/244) phosphorylation were reduced with 1 compared with 5 min inter-set rest, whereas phosphorylation of eEF2(Thr56) , TSC2(Thr1462) , AMPK(Thr172) and REDD1 protein were greater for 1 compared with 5 min inter-set rest. Serum testosterone was greater at 20-40 min postexercise and plasma lactate greater immediately postexercise for 1 versus 5 min inter-set rest. Resistance exercise with short (1 min) inter-set rest duration attenuated myofibrillar protein synthesis during the early postexercise recovery period compared with longer (5 min) rest duration, potentially through compromised activation of intracellular signalling.
© 2016 The Authors. Experimental Physiology © 2016 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27126459     DOI: 10.1113/EP085647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  7 in total

Review 1.  Molecular regulation of human skeletal muscle protein synthesis in response to exercise and nutrients: a compass for overcoming age-related anabolic resistance.

Authors:  Nathan Hodson; Daniel W D West; Andrew Philp; Nicholas A Burd; Daniel R Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 2.  Effects of Rest Interval Duration in Resistance Training on Measures of Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jozo Grgic; Brad J Schoenfeld; Mislav Skrepnik; Timothy B Davies; Pavle Mikulic
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Overload-mediated skeletal muscle hypertrophy is not impaired by loss of myofiber STAT3.

Authors:  Joaquín Pérez-Schindler; Mary C Esparza; James McKendry; Leigh Breen; Andrew Philp; Simon Schenk
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.249

4.  Training to Fatigue: The Answer for Standardization When Assessing Muscle Hypertrophy?

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Matthew B Jessee; Kevin T Mattocks; J Grant Mouser; Brittany R Counts; Samuel L Buckner; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Volume for Muscle Hypertrophy and Health Outcomes: The Most Effective Variable in Resistance Training.

Authors:  Vandré Casagrande Figueiredo; Belmiro Freitas de Salles; Gabriel S Trajano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Age-Related Anabolic Resistance of Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Is Exacerbated in Obese Inactive Individuals.

Authors:  Benoit Smeuninx; James Mckendry; Daisy Wilson; Una Martin; Leigh Breen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Chronic Effects of Resistance Training in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Wanderson Divino Nilo Dos Santos; Paulo Gentil; Rafael Felipe de Moraes; João Batista Ferreira Júnior; Mário Hebling Campos; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; Ruffo Freitas Júnior; Martim Bottaro; Carlos Alexandre Vieira
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.