Marion W Carter1, Loretta Gavin2, Lauren B Zapata3, Marta Bornstein4, Nancy Mautone-Smith2, Susan B Moskosky2. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-E-80, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. Electronic address: Acq0@cdc.gov. 2. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health, Office of Population Affairs, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 700, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop F-74, Chamblee, GA 30341-3717, USA. 4. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, based at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-E-80, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe aspects of the scope and quality of family planning services provided by US publicly funded health centers before the release of relevant federal recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: Using nationally representative survey data (N=1615), we describe four aspects of service delivery: family planning services provided, contraceptive methods provided onsite, written contraceptive counseling protocols and youth-friendly services. We created a count index for each issue and used multivariable ordered logistic regression to identify health center characteristics associated with scoring higher on each. RESULTS: Half of the sample received Title X funding and about a third each were a community health center or health department clinic. The vast majority reported frequently providing contraceptive services (89%) and STD services (87%) for women in the past 3 months. Service provision to males was substantially lower except for STD screening. A total of 63% and 48% of health centers provided hormonal IUDs and implants onsite in the past 3 months, respectively. Forty percent of health centers included all five recommended contraceptive counseling practices in written protocols. Of youth-friendly services, active promotion of confidential services was among the most commonly reported (83%); offering weekend/evening hours was among the least (42%). In multivariable analyses, receiving Title X funding, having larger volumes of family planning clients and being a Planned Parenthood clinic were associated with higher scores on most indices. CONCLUSION: Many services were consistent with the recommendations for providing quality family planning services, but there was room for improvement across domains and health centers types. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: As assessed in this paper, the scope and quality of these family planning services was relatively high, particularly among Planned Parenthood clinics and Title X-funded centers. However, results point to important areas for improvement. Future studies should assess change as implementation of recent family planning service recommendations continues. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe aspects of the scope and quality of family planning services provided by US publicly funded health centers before the release of relevant federal recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: Using nationally representative survey data (N=1615), we describe four aspects of service delivery: family planning services provided, contraceptive methods provided onsite, written contraceptive counseling protocols and youth-friendly services. We created a count index for each issue and used multivariable ordered logistic regression to identify health center characteristics associated with scoring higher on each. RESULTS: Half of the sample received Title X funding and about a third each were a community health center or health department clinic. The vast majority reported frequently providing contraceptive services (89%) and STD services (87%) for women in the past 3 months. Service provision to males was substantially lower except for STD screening. A total of 63% and 48% of health centers provided hormonal IUDs and implants onsite in the past 3 months, respectively. Forty percent of health centers included all five recommended contraceptive counseling practices in written protocols. Of youth-friendly services, active promotion of confidential services was among the most commonly reported (83%); offering weekend/evening hours was among the least (42%). In multivariable analyses, receiving Title X funding, having larger volumes of family planning clients and being a Planned Parenthood clinic were associated with higher scores on most indices. CONCLUSION: Many services were consistent with the recommendations for providing quality family planning services, but there was room for improvement across domains and health centers types. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: As assessed in this paper, the scope and quality of these family planning services was relatively high, particularly among Planned Parenthood clinics and Title X-funded centers. However, results point to important areas for improvement. Future studies should assess change as implementation of recent family planning service recommendations continues. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Contraceptive counseling; Contraceptive methods; Title X; Youth-friendly services
Authors: Anna W Brittain; Heather D Tevendale; Trisha Mueller; Aniket D Kulkarni; Dawn Middleton; Michela L B Garrison; Mary R Read-Wahidi; Emilia H Koumans Journal: J Community Health Date: 2020-06
Authors: Nathan Hale; Wondimu S Manalew; Edward Leinaar; Michael Smith; Bisakha Sen; Pradeep Sharma; Amal Khoury Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2021-10-12
Authors: Blair G Darney; Frances M Biel; Maria I Rodriguez; R Lorie Jacob; Erika K Cottrell; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: Med Care Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 2.983