Literature DB >> 27125809

Absolute risk of cardiovascular disease events, and blood pressure- and lipid-lowering therapy in Australia.

Emily Banks1, Simon R Crouch2, Rosemary J Korda3, Bill Stavreski4, Karen Page5, Katherine A Thurber3, Robert Grenfell3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and treatment in Australian adults. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional representative study of 9564 people aged 18 years or more who had participated in the 2011-12 Australian National Health Measures Survey (response rate for those aged 45-74 years: 46.5%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prior CVD was ascertained and 5-year absolute risk of a primary CVD event calculated (using the Australian National Vascular Disease Prevention Alliance algorithm; categories: low [< 10%], moderate [10-15%], and high [> 15%] risk) on the basis of data on medical history, risk factors and medications, derived from interviews, physical measurements, and blood and urine samples.
RESULTS: Absolute CVD risk increased with age and was higher among men than women. Overall, 19.9% (95% CI, 18.5-21.3%) of Australians aged 45-74 years had a high absolute risk of a future CVD event (an estimated 1 445 000 people): 8.7% (95% CI, 7.8-9.6%) had prior CVD (estimated 634 000 people) and 11.2% (95% CI, 10.2-12.2%) had high primary CVD risk (estimated 811 000 people). A further 8.6% (95% CI, 7.4-9.8%, estimated 625 000) were at moderate primary CVD risk. Among those with prior CVD, 44.2% (95% CI, 36.8-51.6%) were receiving blood pressure- and lipid-lowering medications, 35.4% (95% CI, 27.8-43.0%) were receiving only one of these, and 20.4% (95% CI, 13.9-26.9%) were receiving neither. Corresponding figures for high primary CVD risk were 24.3% (95% CI, 18.3-30.3%); 28.7% (95% CI, 22.7-34.7%); and 47.1% (95% CI, 39.9-54.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: About one-fifth of the Australian population aged 45-74 years (about 1.4 million individuals) were estimated to have a high absolute risk of a future CVD event. Most (estimated 970 000) were not receiving currently recommended combination blood pressure- and lipid-lowering therapy, indicating substantial potential for health gains by increasing routine assessment and treatment according to absolute CVD risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27125809     DOI: 10.5694/mja15.01004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  15 in total

1.  Patient beliefs and attitudes to taking statins: systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Angela Ju; Camilla S Hanson; Emily Banks; Rosemary Korda; Jonathan C Craig; Tim Usherwood; Peter MacDonald; Allison Tong
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The Impact of Health Literacy-Sensitive Design and Heart Age in a Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Decision Aid: Randomized Controlled Trial and End-User Testing.

Authors:  Carissa Bonner; Carys Batcup; Julie Ayre; Erin Cvejic; Lyndal Trevena; Kirsten McCaffery; Jenny Doust
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2022-04-15

3.  Absolute cardiovascular risk scores and medication use in rural India: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mulugeta Molla Birhanu; Roger G Evans; Ayse Zengin; Michaela Riddell; Kartik Kalyanram; Kamakshi Kartik; Oduru Suresh; Nihal Jacob Thomas; Velandai K Srikanth; Amanda G Thrift
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Socioeconomic variation in incidence of primary and secondary major cardiovascular disease events: an Australian population-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rosemary J Korda; Kay Soga; Grace Joshy; Bianca Calabria; John Attia; Deborah Wong; Emily Banks
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2016-11-21

5.  Patterns and trends of potentially inappropriate high-density lipoprotein cholesterol testing in Australian adults at high risk of cardiovascular disease from 2008 to 2014: analysis of linked individual patient data from the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

Authors:  Farshid Hajati; Evan Atlantis; Katy J L Bell; Federico Girosi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  What drives adoption of a computerised, multifaceted quality improvement intervention for cardiovascular disease management in primary healthcare settings? A mixed methods analysis using normalisation process theory.

Authors:  Bindu Patel; Tim Usherwood; Mark Harris; Anushka Patel; Kathryn Panaretto; Nicholas Zwar; David Peiris
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Implementing cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines to translate evidence-based medicine and shared decision making into general practice: theory-based intervention development, qualitative piloting and quantitative feasibility.

Authors:  Carissa Bonner; Michael Anthony Fajardo; Jenny Doust; Kirsten McCaffery; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Evaluation of clinical quality improvement interventions: feasibility of an integrated approach.

Authors:  Sandeep Reddy; Kevin Mc Namara; Mary Malakellis; Tim Denton; Cathy McDonald; Jane Opie; Andrew Sanigorski; Vincent Versace
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-01-10

9.  Cardiovascular health status among Australian adults.

Authors:  Yang Peng; Zhiqiang Wang
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Cross-sectional survey describing general practitioners' absolute cardiovascular disease risk assessment practices and their relationship to knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about cardiovascular disease risk in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Kim Greaves; Anita Smith; Jason Agostino; Kuhan Kunarajah; Tony Stanton; Rosemary Korda
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.