| Literature DB >> 27125663 |
Li Zhang1, Dezheng Yang1, Wenchun Wang1, Sen Wang1, Hao Yuan1, Zilu Zhao1, Chaofeng Sang1, Li Jia1.
Abstract
In this study, needle-array to plate electrodeEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27125663 PMCID: PMC4850499 DOI: 10.1038/srep25242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Experimental setup.
Figure 2Discharge images in empty and packed bed electrode gap.
(a) ACDBD; (b) NPDBD.
Figure 3Waveforms of applied voltage and discharge current of ACDBD in different discharge duration time.
Figure 4(a) Waveforms of applied voltage and discharge current of NPDBD in different discharge duration time; (b) Waveforms of pulse voltage, total current, displacement current, and discharge current in positive pulse discharge of NPDBD.
Figure 5Discharge power varies as a function of DDT in the applied voltage of 20 kV, 24 kV and 28 kV.
(a) ACDBD; (b) NPDBD.
Figure 6The optical emission spectra emitted from both ACDBD and NPDBD.
(a) In range of 300–420 nm; (b) In range of 500–800 nm.
Figure 7Comparing the experimental spectra and the best-fitted spectra to determine plasma gas temperature.
(a) OES of N2 (C3Πu → B3Πg, 0–2); (b) OES of N2 (B3Πg → A3∑+, 0–2).
Figure 8Effect of DDT on plasma gas temperatures in both empty (hollow symbol) and packed bed (solid symbol) electrode gap.
(a) ACDBD; (b) NPDBD.
Figure 9Effects of DDT on plasma gas temperatures of ACDBD and NPDBD in packed bed electrode gap with fixed initial discharge power (7.15 W).
Figure 10Effects of discharge power densities and input powers on the removing efficiency of HCHO in both ACDBD and NPDBD with empty (hollow symbol) and packed bed (solid symbol) electrode gap.
(a) Effects of discharge power densities; (b) Effects of input powers.
Figure 11Effects of O2 concentrations on HCHO removing efficiencies in both ACDBD and NPDBD with empty (hollow symbol) and packed bed (solid symbol) electrode gap.
Reactions and rate constants for the HCHO–air system.
| The excitation processes | |||
| 1 | e + N2 → N2 (A) + e | log k1 = −8.4−14/Θ | 34 |
| 2 | e + N2 → N2 (B) + e | log k2 = −8.2−14.8/Θ | 34 |
| 3 | e + N2 → N2 (C) + e | log k3 = −8.2−21.1/Θ | 34 |
| 4 | e + O2 → O2 (a) + e | log k4 = −10.2−0.35/Θ (Θ>4) | 34 |
| 5 | e + O2 → O2 (b) + e | log k5 = −11.2−0.72/Θ (Θ>4) | 34 |
| The dissociation processes | |||
| 6 | e + N2 → N (4S) + N (2S) + e | – | 34 |
| 7 | e + N2 → N (4S) + N (2D) + e | – | 34 |
| 8 | e + N2 → N (4S) + N (2P) + e | – | 34 |
| 9 | e + O2 → O (3P) + O (3P) + e | log | 34 |
| 10 | e + O2 → O (3P) + O (1D) + e | log | 34 |
| 11 | e + O2 → O (3P) + O (1S) + e | log | 34 |
| The ionization processes | |||
| 12 | e + N2 → N2+ + e + e | – | 34 |
| The quenching processes of N2 (A) and N2 (B) | |||
| 13 | N2 (A) + O2 → N2 (X) + O +O | 34 | |
| 14 | N2 (A) + O2 → N2O +O | 34 | |
| 15 | N2 (A) + O → NO +N (2D) | 34 | |
| 16 | N2 (A) + O →N2 (X) + O (1S) | 34 | |
| 17 | N2 (A) + NO → N2(X) + NO | 34 | |
| 18 | N2 (A) + O2 → N2 (X) + O2 ( | 34 | |
| 19 | N2 (A) + O2−→ O2 + N2 + e | 34 | |
| 20 | N2 (A) + N2 (A) → N2 (C) + N2 (X) | 34 | |
| 21 | N2 (A) + N2 → N2 (X) + N2 | 34 | |
| 22 | N2 (A) + N (4S) → N2 (X) + N (2P) | 34 | |
| 23 | N2 (B) + N2 → N2 (X) + N2 | 34 | |
| 24 | N2 (B) → N2 (A) + | 34 | |
| 25 | N2 (B) + NO → N2 (X) +NO | 34 | |
| 26 | N2 (B) + O2 → N2 (X) + O +O | 34 | |
| The degradation processes of HCHO | |||
| 27 | HCHO + OH → CHO + H2O | 10 | |
| 28 | HCHO + O → CHO + OH | 10 | |
| 29 | HCHO + H → H2 + CO | 10 | |
| 30 | HCHO + HO2 → H2O2 + CHO | 10 | |
| 31 | CHO + N2 (A) → CO + H + N2 (X) | 10 | |
| 32 | CHO + OH → CO + H2O | 10 | |
| 33 | CHO + O2 → CO2 + OH | 10 | |
| 34 | CHO + O → CO2 + H | 10 | |
| The quenching processes of OH | |||
| 35 | OH + O → H + O2 | 35 | |
| 36 | OH + O3 → HO2 + O2 | 35 | |
| The capturing processes of free electrons | |||
| 37 | e + O2 → O2− | – | 35 |
| 38 | e + O2 + M → O2− +M | 35 | |
The rubric for this table is as follows: column 1 contains a reference number for each reaction; column 2 specifies the reaction; column 3 gives an expression for the rate constant in cm3s−1 units, and column 4 gives references.
(1) In reactions 1–11, the reaction rate can be decided by the values of parameter (reduce electric field intensity) Θ = E/N, which is taken in units of 10−16 V cm2, and in present experiment, the Θ is the range of 20–30 (neglect the influence by space charge);
(2) In reactions 16–26, the reaction rate constants are cited from ref. 34, where gas temperature for the reactions is 350 K;
(3) In reactions 38 and 39, M represents N2, O2, or H2O molecules.
Figure 12Effect of the concentration of O2 on the emission intensities of O (3p5P → 3s5S20) and OH (A2Σ → X2Π, 0-0) in ACDBD and NPDBD with same energy intensity.