Christina Condon1, Sarah Lycan1, Pamela Duncan1, Cheryl Bushnell2. 1. From the Department of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC. 2. From the Department of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC. cbushnel@wakehealth.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine whether a standardized Transitional Stroke Clinic (TSC) led by nurse practitioners could reduce 30-day and 90-day readmissions for stroke or transient ischemic attack patients discharged home. METHODS: Phase I consisted of nurse practitioners calling only high-risk patients discharged home within 7 days and performing an office visit within 2 to 4 weeks of discharge. Phase II consisted of all patients discharged home receiving both a 2-day follow-up phone call by a registered nurse and a follow-up visit with a nurse practitioner within 7 to 14 days. Differences in process metrics and readmissions across the 2 phases and overall were assessed. Increasing complexity with multiple chronic conditions (diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure) was represented in a continuous variable from 0 to 3. Multivariable logistic regression models for 30-day and 90-day readmissions were performed with adjustment for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and previous hospitalizations. RESULTS: From October 2012 through September 2015, 510 patients were enrolled. From phase I to II, a higher proportion of follow-up calls were made and days from discharge to TSC decreased. Patients readmitted within 30 days were less likely to show for TSC visits (60.85% versus 76.3%; P=0.021). Multivariable modeling showed that TSC visit was associated with a 48% reduction in 30-day readmission (odds ratio, 0.518; 95% confidence interval, 0.272-0.986), whereas multiple chronic conditions and previous stroke/transient ischemic attack increased the risk. TSC visit did not impact 90-day readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation in a nurse practitioner-led structured clinic is a model that may reduce readmissions at 30 days for stroke patients discharged home.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine whether a standardized Transitional Stroke Clinic (TSC) led by nurse practitioners could reduce 30-day and 90-day readmissions for stroke or transient ischemic attack patients discharged home. METHODS: Phase I consisted of nurse practitioners calling only high-risk patients discharged home within 7 days and performing an office visit within 2 to 4 weeks of discharge. Phase II consisted of all patients discharged home receiving both a 2-day follow-up phone call by a registered nurse and a follow-up visit with a nurse practitioner within 7 to 14 days. Differences in process metrics and readmissions across the 2 phases and overall were assessed. Increasing complexity with multiple chronic conditions (diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure) was represented in a continuous variable from 0 to 3. Multivariable logistic regression models for 30-day and 90-day readmissions were performed with adjustment for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and previous hospitalizations. RESULTS: From October 2012 through September 2015, 510 patients were enrolled. From phase I to II, a higher proportion of follow-up calls were made and days from discharge to TSC decreased. Patients readmitted within 30 days were less likely to show for TSC visits (60.85% versus 76.3%; P=0.021). Multivariable modeling showed that TSC visit was associated with a 48% reduction in 30-day readmission (odds ratio, 0.518; 95% confidence interval, 0.272-0.986), whereas multiple chronic conditions and previous stroke/transient ischemic attack increased the risk. TSC visit did not impact 90-day readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation in a nurse practitioner-led structured clinic is a model that may reduce readmissions at 30 days for strokepatients discharged home.
Authors: Michelle H Leppert; Stefan Sillau; Richard C Lindrooth; Sharon N Poisson; Jonathan D Campbell; Jennifer R Simpson Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J Margo Brooks Carthon; Heather Brom; Matthew McHugh; Marguerite Daus; Rachel French; Douglas M Sloane; Robert Berg; Raina Merchant; Linda H Aiken Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2022 Jan-Feb 01 Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Addie Middleton; Yong-Fang Kuo; James E Graham; Amol Karmarkar; Yu-Li Lin; James S Goodwin; Allen Haas; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: William S Bayliss; Cheryl D Bushnell; Jacqueline R Halladay; Pamela W Duncan; Janet K Freburger; Anna M Kucharska-Newton; Justin G Trogdon Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Cheryl D Bushnell; Pamela W Duncan; Sarah L Lycan; Christina N Condon; Amy M Pastva; Barbara J Lutz; Jacqueline R Halladay; Doyle M Cummings; Martinson K Arnan; Sara B Jones; Mysha E Sissine; Sylvia W Coleman; Anna M Johnson; Sabina B Gesell; Laurie H Mettam; Janet K Freburger; Blair Barton-Percival; Karen M Taylor; Janet Prvu-Bettger; Gladys Lundy-Lamm; Wayne D Rosamond Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: William Denney Zimmerman; Rachel E Grenier; Sydney V Palka; Kelsey J Monacci; Amanda K Lantzy; Jacqueline A Leutbecker; Xue Geng; Mary Carter Denny Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 4.003