Chi-Chun Liao1, Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee2, Shyr-Yeu Lin3, Ming-Huei Lin4, Yuh-Ming Hwu5. 1. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. 4. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: hwu4416@yahoo.com.tw.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments in women of advanced age (>40 years) using anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)-tailored ovarian stimulation protocols versus conventional protocols based on antral follicle count (AFC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 210 women who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles: 116 women underwent stimulation protocols that were tailored to their AMH levels, whereas 94 women received treatment using conventional stimulation protocols based on AFC as the ovarian reserve marker. RESULTS: The following parameters were significantly higher in the AMH-tailored group than in the conventional group: initial and total doses (IU) of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) used for stimulation (514.2 ± 137.9 vs. 452.3 ± 135.3, p = 0.001; 4713.8 ± 1618.8 vs. 4047.2 ± 1366.0, p = 0.007, respectively), ovum pick-up rate (OPU; 88.8% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.016), serum estradiol (E2) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration (1818.5 ± 1422.4 vs. 1394.0 ± 929.0 pg/mL, p = 0.028), number of oocytes retrieved (7.4 ± 5.1 vs. 5.5 ± 3.4, p = 0.007), number of embryos per case (4.2 ± 3.2 vs. 3.3 ± 2.5, p = 0.048), clinical pregnancy rates (22.4% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.008), implantation rates (13.1% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.001), and live birth rates per cycle (15.5% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols tailored to patients' AMH levels may improve the pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and live birth rate in women of advanced age undergoing IVF/ICSI compared with those receiving conventional stimulation protocols.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments in women of advanced age (>40 years) using anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)-tailored ovarian stimulation protocols versus conventional protocols based on antral follicle count (AFC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 210 women who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles: 116 women underwent stimulation protocols that were tailored to their AMH levels, whereas 94 women received treatment using conventional stimulation protocols based on AFC as the ovarian reserve marker. RESULTS: The following parameters were significantly higher in the AMH-tailored group than in the conventional group: initial and total doses (IU) of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) used for stimulation (514.2 ± 137.9 vs. 452.3 ± 135.3, p = 0.001; 4713.8 ± 1618.8 vs. 4047.2 ± 1366.0, p = 0.007, respectively), ovum pick-up rate (OPU; 88.8% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.016), serum estradiol (E2) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration (1818.5 ± 1422.4 vs. 1394.0 ± 929.0 pg/mL, p = 0.028), number of oocytes retrieved (7.4 ± 5.1 vs. 5.5 ± 3.4, p = 0.007), number of embryos per case (4.2 ± 3.2 vs. 3.3 ± 2.5, p = 0.048), clinical pregnancy rates (22.4% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.008), implantation rates (13.1% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.001), and live birth rates per cycle (15.5% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols tailored to patients' AMH levels may improve the pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and live birth rate in women of advanced age undergoing IVF/ICSI compared with those receiving conventional stimulation protocols.