Literature DB >> 27125400

Comparison of the laparoscopic versus conventional open method for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.

Ling-Hui Chu1, Wen-Chun Chang1, Bor-Ching Sheu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although laparoscopic surgery is widely utilized in the treatment of endometrial cancer, its efficacy in staging the cancer is not well established. The aim of this study was to compare staging endometrial cancer with laparoscopic and conventional open methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2002 to June 2012, 151 patients (70 treated by laparoscopy and 81 by laparotomy) diagnosed with endometrial cancer were enrolled. This was a retrospective cohort review of endometrial cancer surgically staged using laparoscopy or laparotomy in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
RESULTS: The two groups did not significantly differ in patient age, body mass index, previous obstetrical history, or amount of previous abdominal surgery. No differences between the surgical cohorts were observed in relation to cancer status, including stage, grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, lymph node involvement, and recurrence rate. The laparoscopic approach had less intraoperative blood loss, longer operative time, lower uterine weight, number of removed lymph nodes, and shorter hospital stay.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results showed that the laparoscopic method for staging endometrial cancer was technically feasible and efficient.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial carcinoma; laparoscopy; staging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27125400     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  13 in total

1.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  A Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes in Uterine Cancer Surgery After the Introduction of Robotic-Assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Reshu Agarwal; Anupama Rajanbabu; Gaurav Goel; U G Unnikrishnan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-09-19

3.  A Prospective Analysis of Laparoscopic Management of Endometrial Cancer in a Tertiary Care Centre.

Authors:  Kavitha Yogini Duraisamy; Malathi Ezhilmani; Devi Balasubramaniam; Kodeeswari Periyasamy
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 4.  The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Minimally invasive abdominal cerclage compared to laparotomy: a comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes.

Authors:  Soorin Kim; Amanda Hill; Gulden Menderes; Sarah Cross; Masoud Azodi; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-18

6.  Comparison of outcomes following laparoscopic and open hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Xu Cong Ruan; Wai Loong Wong; Hui Qing Yeong; Yong Kuei Timothy Lim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Intraperitoneal cytology after laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Tomohito Tanaka; Yoshito Terai; Kazuya Maeda; Keisuke Ashihara; Yuhei Kogata; Hiroshi Maruoka; Shinichi Terada; Takashi Yamada; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Comparison Between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in Systematic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Tomohito Tanaka; Yoshito Terai; Shigenori Hayashi; Daisuke Aoki; Michiyasu Miki; Eiji Kobayashi; Tadashi Kimura; Tsukasa Baba; Noriomi Matsumura; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  How the silent mentor program improves our surgical level and safety and nourishes our spiritual life.

Authors:  Mun-Kun Hong; Tang-Yuan Chu; Dah-Ching Ding
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2017-02-01

10.  Nationwide Comparison of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Patients Undergoing Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Eoh; Eun-Ji Nam; Sang-Wun Kim; Minkyung Shin; Stella J-H Kim; Jung-Ae Kim; Yong-Tae Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.