Literature DB >> 27125156

Registered nurses' clinical reasoning in home healthcare clinical practice: A think-aloud study with protocol analysis.

Hege Mari Johnsen1, Åshild Slettebø2, Mariann Fossum2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The home healthcare context can be unpredictable and complex, and requires registered nurses with a high level of clinical reasoning skills and professional autonomy. Thus, additional knowledge about registered nurses' clinical reasoning performance during patient home care is required.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe the cognitive processes and thinking strategies used by recently graduated registered nurses while caring for patients in home healthcare clinical practice.
DESIGN: An exploratory qualitative think-aloud design with protocol analysis was used. SETTINGS: Home healthcare visits to patients with stroke, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in seven healthcare districts in southern Norway. PARTICIPANTS: A purposeful sample of eight registered nurses with one year of experience.
METHODS: Each nurse was interviewed using the concurrent think-aloud technique in three different patient home healthcare clinical practice visits. A total of 24 home healthcare visits occurred. Follow-up interviews were conducted with each participant. The think-aloud sessions were transcribed and analysed using three-step protocol analysis.
RESULTS: Recently graduated registered nurses focused on both general nursing concepts and concepts specific to the domains required and tasks provided in home healthcare services as well as for different patient groups. Additionally, participants used several assertion types, cognitive processes, and thinking strategies.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that recently graduated registered nurses used both simple and complex cognitive processes involving both inductive and deductive reasoning. However, their reasoning was more reactive than proactive. The results may contribute to nursing practice in terms of developing effective nursing education programmes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical skill; Decision-making; Norway; Nursing; Qualitative method; Verbal protocol analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27125156     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  5 in total

1.  Technology-Enabled Remote Monitoring and Self-Management - Vision for Patient Empowerment Following Cardiac and Vascular Surgery: User Testing and Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.

Authors:  Michael McGillion; Jennifer Yost; Andrew Turner; Duane Bender; Ted Scott; Sandra Carroll; Paul Ritvo; Elizabeth Peter; Andre Lamy; Gill Furze; Kirsten Krull; Valerie Dunlop; Amber Good; Nazari Dvirnik; Debbie Bedini; Frank Naus; Shirley Pettit; Shaunattonie Henry; Christine Probst; Joseph Mills; Elaine Gossage; Irene Travale; Janine Duquette; Christy Taberner; Sanjeev Bhavnani; James S Khan; David Cowan; Eric Romeril; John Lee; Tracey Colella; Manon Choinière; Jason Busse; Joel Katz; J Charles Victor; Jeffrey Hoch; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Sharon Kaasalainen; Salima Ladak; Sheila O'Keefe-McCarthy; Monica Parry; Daniel I Sessler; Michael Stacey; Bonnie Stevens; Robyn Stremler; Lehana Thabane; Judy Watt-Watson; Richard Whitlock; Joy C MacDermid; Marit Leegaard; Robert McKelvie; Michael Hillmer; Lynn Cooper; Gavin Arthur; Krista Sider; Susan Oliver; Karen Boyajian; Mark Farrow; Chris Lawton; Darryl Gamble; Jake Walsh; Mark Field; Sandra LeFort; Wendy Clyne; Maria Ricupero; Laurie Poole; Karsten Russell-Wood; Michael Weber; Jolene McNeil; Robyn Alpert; Sarah Sharpe; Sue Bhella; David Mohajer; Sem Ponnambalam; Naeem Lakhani; Rabia Khan; Peter Liu; P J Devereaux
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-08-01

2.  Using a novel assessment of procedural proficiency provides medical educators insight into blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Michael Holmstrup; Brock Jensen; Rebecca Burkart; Malorie Levis
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-19

3.  Examining response process validity of script concordance testing: a think-aloud approach.

Authors:  Michael Siu Hong Wan; Elina Tor; Judith N Hudson
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2020-06-24

4.  Designing Virtual Patients for Education of Nursing Students in Cancer Course.

Authors:  Masoud Bahrami; Arash Hadadgar; Masoumeh Fuladvandi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2021-03-05

5.  Thinking aloud on the road: Thematic differences in the experiences of drivers, cyclists, and motorcyclists.

Authors:  Rich C McIlroy; Katherine L Plant; Neville A Stanton
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2021-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.