Ida L Gitajn1, Marilyn Heng, Michael J Weaver, Lauren K Ehrlichman, Mitchel B Harris. 1. *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Combined Orthopaedics Residency Program, Boston, MA; †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Boston, MA; and ‡Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Boston, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: (1) Compare the outcomes of patients with orthopaedic trauma with culture-negative infection with those with pathogens identified; (2) identify the incidence of culture-negative infection and describe the common characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Two level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: A total of 391 patients 16 years of age or older who underwent irrigation and debridement for surgical site infection after having undergone fracture fixation were included. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent irrigation and debridement with cultures, and antibiotic therapy was initiated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Treatment failure due to unsuccessful eradication of infection and time to union. RESULTS: We found 9% incidence of culture-negative infection. Approximately one-third of patients in both groups went on to have treatment failure (25% of pathogen-specific infections, 38% of culture-negative infections, P = 0.15), and there was no difference between the 2 groups with regard to time to union (22 vs. 24 weeks, P = 0.55). More than one-third of patients required subsequent reconstructive procedure and 5% of patients in each group required amputation to control their infection. There was no difference between the groups with respect to the use of antibiotics before intervention and culture. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the devastating effect that postoperative infections can have and suggests that, with clinical sign of infection, negative cultures do not portend a better prognosis. These entities should be treated in a similar manner to infections with positive cultures. Furthermore, we believe that future studies should not strictly rely on the presence of positive intraoperative cultures. Consensus as to what constitutes a clinical infection, in the absence of positive cultures, is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
OBJECTIVES: (1) Compare the outcomes of patients with orthopaedic trauma with culture-negative infection with those with pathogens identified; (2) identify the incidence of culture-negative infection and describe the common characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Two level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: A total of 391 patients 16 years of age or older who underwent irrigation and debridement for surgical site infection after having undergone fracture fixation were included. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent irrigation and debridement with cultures, and antibiotic therapy was initiated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Treatment failure due to unsuccessful eradication of infection and time to union. RESULTS: We found 9% incidence of culture-negative infection. Approximately one-third of patients in both groups went on to have treatment failure (25% of pathogen-specific infections, 38% of culture-negative infections, P = 0.15), and there was no difference between the 2 groups with regard to time to union (22 vs. 24 weeks, P = 0.55). More than one-third of patients required subsequent reconstructive procedure and 5% of patients in each group required amputation to control their infection. There was no difference between the groups with respect to the use of antibiotics before intervention and culture. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the devastating effect that postoperative infections can have and suggests that, with clinical sign of infection, negative cultures do not portend a better prognosis. These entities should be treated in a similar manner to infections with positive cultures. Furthermore, we believe that future studies should not strictly rely on the presence of positive intraoperative cultures. Consensus as to what constitutes a clinical infection, in the absence of positive cultures, is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: Kyle H Cichos; Clay A Spitler; Jonathan H Quade; Joseph P Johnson; Michael D Johnson; Elie S Ghanem Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Ruth A Corrigan; Jonathan Sliepen; Maria Dudareva; Frank F A IJpma; Geertje Govaert; Bridget L Atkins; Rob Rentenaar; Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker; Martin McNally Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2022-07-14
Authors: Madeleine C Stevenson; Julia C Slater; H Claude Sagi; Federico Palacio Bedoya; Margaret V Powers-Fletcher Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 11.677
Authors: Carlos Prada; Stephanie L Tanner; Francesc A Marcano-Fernández; Sofia Bzovsky; Emil H Schemitsch; Kyle Jeray; Brad Petrisor; Mohit Bhandari; Sheila Sprague Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Quirine M J van der Vliet; Yassine Ochen; Michael F McTague; Michael J Weaver; Falco Hietbrink; Roderick M Houwert; Luke P H Leenen; Marilyn Heng Journal: OTA Int Date: 2019-11-22