Literature DB >> 27124825

Five-Year Outcome Analysis of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing a 2-Screw and a Single-Screw Cephalomedullary Nail.

Josephine Berger-Groch1, Martin Rupprecht, Steffen Schoepper, Malte Schroeder, Johannes Maria Rueger, Michael Hoffmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the radiological and functional outcome after fixation of intertrochanteric fractures (IF) using either an integrated 2-screw cephalomedullary nail [InterTan (IT); Smith & Nephew] or a single-screw device [Gamma3 (G3); Stryker] with a 5-year follow-up.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. SETTINGS: A single-center study. PATIENTS: One hundred four patients with a mean age of 81.2 ± 9.2 years were included, 33 patients were available for the final 5-year follow-up, 63 patients died, and 8 patients were lost for follow-up. INTERVENTION: Internal fixation of intertrochaneteric femur fractures using a cephalomedullary nail with either a single screw or an integrated 2-screw system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Length of hospital stay, SF-36-questionnaire, Harris-Hip-Score, radiographs.
RESULTS: SF-36 index at 6 months indicated that 93% of the IT group returned to their prefracture status compared with only 80% in the G3 group. For the mental health SF-36 index, the IT patients showed a significant increased level 6 months after the index procedure (IT: P = 0.02; G3: P = 0.20). The length of hospital stay was significantly (P = 0.03) shorter in the IT group. After 5 years however, neither group had significant implant-related complications or differences in terms of functional outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Regarding functional outcome and hospital stay, the IT collective performed better in the 6-month follow-up. After 5 years, no significant differences were recorded. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27124825     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  11 in total

Review 1.  Is rotation the mode of failure in pertrochanteric fractures fixed with nails? Theoretical approach and illustrative cases.

Authors:  C Kokoroghiannis; D Vasilakos; K Zisis; G Dimitriou; E Pappa; D Evangelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-20

2.  Cephalomedullary nailing for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures 31A3 (AO/OTA).

Authors:  Emanuela Marsillo; Andrea Pintore; Giovanni Asparago; Francesco Oliva; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-13

Review 3.  Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Joseph Lewis; Jamie Stokes; James R Gill; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Martyn J Parker; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes of Performing Surgery with the InterTan Intramedullary Nail in Treating Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  A-Bing Li; Wei-Jiang Zhang; Ji-Qi Wang; You-Ming Zhao; Wei-Jun Guo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes with InterTan vs Gamma nail or PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Xiong Ma; Ming-Jie Kuang; Zheng-Rui Fan; Fei Xing; Yun-Long Zhao; Lu-Kai Zhang; Heng-Ting Chen; Chao Han; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes in intertrochanteric fractures treated with InterTAN nail against conventional cephalomedullary nails: a systematic review.

Authors:  Akshay Date; Mrinalini Panthula; Anita Bolina
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-12-07

7.  Comparison of efficacy, complications and TGF-β2 expression between DHS and PFNA in elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Rao Xu; Jiangying Ru; Feng Ji; Jie Liu; Yong Ji; Zhiquan Wu; Dai Shi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Leo M Nherera; Paul Trueman; Alan Horner; Alan J Johnstone; Tracy J Watson; Francis A Fatoye
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Proximal Femoral Nail Unlocked versus Locked (ProFNUL): a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-armed randomised controlled trial for the effect of femoral nail mode of lag screw locking and screw configuration in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Authors:  Arjun Sivakumar; Dominic Thewlis; Andreas Ladurner; Suzanne Edwards; Mark Rickman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Biomechanical Comparison of INTERTAN Nail and Gamma3 Nail for Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Wei Luo; Xin Fu; Jian-Xiong Ma; Jing-Min Huang; Jiang Wu; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.