| Literature DB >> 27124492 |
Antoine Mottier1,2, Florence Mouchet1,2, Christophe Laplanche1,2, Stéphanie Cadarsi1,2, Laura Lagier1,2, Jean-Charles Arnault3, Hugues A Girard3, Verónica León4, Ester Vázquez4, Cyril Sarrieu5,6, Éric Pinelli1,2, Laury Gauthier1,2, Emmanuel Flahaut5,6.
Abstract
Engineered nanoparticles such as graphenes, nanodiamonds, and carbon nanotubes correspond to different allotropes of carbon and are among the best candidates for applications in fast-growing nanotechnology. It is thus likely that they may get into the environment at each step of their life cycle: production, use, and disposal. The aquatic compartment concentrates pollutants and is expected to be especially impacted. The toxicity of a compound is conventionally evaluated using mass concentration as a quantitative measure of exposure. However, several studies have highlighted that such a metric is not the best descriptor at the nanoscale. Here we compare the inhibition of Xenopus laevis larvae growth after in vivo exposure to different carbon nanoparticles for 12 days using different dose metrics and clearly show that surface area is the most relevant descriptor of toxicity for different types of carbon allotropes.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon allotropes; carbon nanotubes; ecotoxicity; graphene; metrics comparison; nanodiamonds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27124492 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nano Lett ISSN: 1530-6984 Impact factor: 11.189