Literature DB >> 2712448

Maximal relaxation rates of esophageal, nose, and mouth pressures during a sniff reflect inspiratory muscle fatigue.

N Koulouris1, L G Vianna, D A Mulvey, M Green, J Moxham.   

Abstract

Maximal relaxation rate (MRR, % pressure fall/10 msec) of the inspiratory muscles is reduced with fatigue. We have investigated whether MRR of esophageal pressure (Pes) generated by voluntary sniffs is decreased by fatigue, and whether sniff nasopharyngeal (Pnp) and mouth (Pmo) MRR reflect these changes. In 10 normal subjects, control MRR of sniff Pes correlated closely to Pnp MRR (r = 0.977, p less than 0.001) and Pmo MRR (r = 0.947, p less than 0.001). To produce inspiratory muscle fatigue, four highly motivated subjects breathed to exhaustion (3 to 6 min) through a high inspiratory resistance. MRR was determined from 10 sniffs for Pes, Pnp, and Pmo before fatigue, and at intervals up to 10 min after fatigue. The subjects showed a mean decrease in sniff Pes MRR of 33% (range, 20 to 42) immediately after fatigue, which returned exponentially to control values within 3 to 4 min. The mean changes in Pes MRR were reflected by similar changes in Pnp MRR, 32% (range, 18 to 43) and Pmo MRR, 33% (range, 21 to 42). Studies were repeated in the four subjects with closely similar results. We conclude that fatigue of the inspiratory muscles reduces MRR of sniff Pes, and that this is reflected in Pnp and Pmo. Sniff Pes, Pnp, and Pmo MRR measurements may provide a useful method for detecting and monitoring fatigue; Pnp and Pmo have the advantage of being less invasive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2712448     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/139.5.1213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  12 in total

1.  Inter-test reliability for non-invasive measures of respiratory muscle function in healthy humans.

Authors:  Lee M Romer; Alison K McConnell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Assisted ventilation. 4. Weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J Goldstone; J Moxham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Effect of maximum ventilation on abdominal muscle relaxation rate.

Authors:  D Kyroussis; G H Mills; M I Polkey; C H Hamnegard; S Wragg; J Road; M Green; J Moxham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Inspiratory muscle relaxation rate assessed from sniff nasal pressure.

Authors:  D Kyroussis; G Mills; C H Hamnegard; S Wragg; J Road; M Green; J Moxham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Maximum relaxation rate of the diaphragm during weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J C Goldstone; M Green; J Moxham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Inspiratory muscle maximum relaxation rate measured from submaximal sniff nasal pressure in patients with severe COPD.

Authors:  D Kyroussis; L C Johnson; C-H Hamnegard; M I Polkey; J Moxham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Diagnostic methods to assess inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength.

Authors:  Pedro Caruso; André Luis Pereira de Albuquerque; Pauliane Vieira Santana; Leticia Zumpano Cardenas; Jeferson George Ferreira; Elena Prina; Patrícia Fernandes Trevizan; Mayra Caleffi Pereira; Vinicius Iamonti; Renata Pletsch; Marcelo Ceneviva Macchione; Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Effects of diaphragmatic control on multiparametric analysis of the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure test and inspiratory muscle activity in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Kadja Benício; Vanessa R Resqueti; Fernando A L Dias; Francesca Pennati; Andrea Aliverti; Jéssica Danielle Medeiros da Fonseca; Guilherme A F Fregonezi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Changes in electromyographic activity, mechanical power, and relaxation rates following inspiratory ribcage muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Antonio Sarmento; Guilherme Fregonezi; Maria Lira; Layana Marques; Francesca Pennati; Vanessa Resqueti; Andrea Aliverti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Respiratory and Cardiovascular Response during Electronic Control Device Exposure in Law Enforcement Trainees.

Authors:  Kirsten M Vanmeenen; Marc H Lavietes; Neil S Cherniack; Michael T Bergen; Ronald Teichman; Richard J Servatius
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.