Literature DB >> 27124255

Evaluation of the Dogs, Physical Activity, and Walking (Dogs PAW) Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Elizabeth A Richards1, Niwako Ogata, Ching-Wei Cheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To facilitate physical activity (PA) adoption and maintenance, promotion of innovative population-level strategies that focus on incorporating moderate-intensity lifestyle PAs are needed.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the Dogs, Physical Activity, and Walking intervention, a 3-month, social cognitive theory (SCT), e-mail-based PA intervention.
METHODS: In a longitudinal, repeated-measures design, 49 dog owners were randomly assigned to a control (n = 25) or intervention group (n = 24). The intervention group received e-mail messages (twice weekly for 4 weeks and weekly for 8 weeks) designed to influence SCT constructs of self-efficacy, self-regulation, outcome expectations and expectancies, and social support. At baseline and every 3 months through 1 year, participants completed self-reported questionnaires of individual, interpersonal, and PA variables. Linear mixed models were used to assess for significant differences in weekly minutes of dog walking and theoretical constructs between groups (intervention and control) across time. To test self-efficacy as a mediator of social support for dog walking, tests for mediation were conducted using the bootstrapping technique.
RESULTS: With the exception of Month 9, participants in the intervention group accumulated significantly more weekly minutes of dog walking than the control group. On average, the intervention group accumulated 58.4 more minutes (SD = 18.1) of weekly dog walking than the control group (p < .05). Self-efficacy partially mediated the effect of social support variables on dog walking. DISCUSSION: Results indicate that a simple SCT-based e-mail intervention is effective in increasing and maintaining an increase in dog walking among dog owners at 12-month follow-up. In light of these findings, it may be advantageous to design dog walking interventions that focus on increasing self-efficacy for dog walking by fostering social support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27124255     DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  4 in total

Review 1.  Encouraging Dog Walking for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Hayley Christian; Adrian Bauman; Jacqueline N Epping; Glenn N Levine; Gavin McCormack; Ryan E Rhodes; Elizabeth Richards; Melanie Rock; Carri Westgarth
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2016-04-17

2.  Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wilma L Zijlema; Hayley Christian; Margarita Triguero-Mas; Marta Cirach; Magdalena van den Berg; Jolanda Maas; Christopher J Gidlow; Hanneke Kruize; Wanda Wendel-Vos; Sandra Andrušaitytė; Regina Grazuleviciene; Jill Litt; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Examining Obedience Training as a Physical Activity Intervention for Dog Owners: Findings from the Stealth Pet Obedience Training (SPOT) Pilot Study.

Authors:  Katie Potter; Brittany Masteller; Laura B Balzer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Veterinary-prescribed physical activity promotes walking in healthy dogs and people.

Authors:  Colleen Duncan; Angela Carswell; Tracy Nelson; Dan J Graham; Felix M Duerr
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.741

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.