Literature DB >> 27123906

The AMCP Format for Formulary Submissions: Welcome to Version 4.0.

.   

Abstract

Managed care pharmacists are increasingly presented with complex considerations related to prescription drug formulary management. As prescription drug spending soars, and new effective, but expensive drugs rush to the market, pharmacists and other health care decision makers must evaluate a myriad of important clinical and economic considerations in determining the relative value and, subsequently, the appropriate placement of a product within a formulary. The AMCP Format for Formulary Submissions, Version 4.0, is the next iteration of the Format, which was first released in 2000. Version 4.0, developed by pharmacists from health plan, manufacturer, and academic perspectives, provides updated recommendations on acquiring and evaluating clinical and economic evidence to inform formulary and medical policy decisions. It also includes new guidance related to emerging special topic considerations such as biosimilars, specialty pharmacy products, and companion diagnostic tests. Version 4.0 has been modified to improve the usability of the Format, with clarifying guidance related to logistical considerations such as a recommended time frame for implementation of Version 4.0, as well as dossier updates and ongoing communication between manufacturers and health care decision makers. The Format should be used as a framework for ongoing evidence-based dialogue between manufacturers and payers. The evolving health care landscape will require new levels of collaboration and communication among key stakeholders to successfully navigate the challenges of this new environment. The Format provides a framework to support these critical interactions related to product value by facilitating an evidence-based, transparent approach. DISCLOSURES: This document was prepared by Jeff Lee, PharmD, FCCP, on behalf of the AMCP Format Executive Committee. Committee members reviewed and provided feedback on the final draft. No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, were reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27123906     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.16071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm


  3 in total

1.  Clinical and economic outcomes among injection-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes initiating dulaglutide compared with basal insulin in a US real-world setting: the DISPEL Study.

Authors:  Reema Mody; Qing Huang; Maria Yu; Hiren Patel; Xian Zhang; Liya Wang; Michael Grabner
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2019-12-09

2.  Budget Impact of Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf) Adoption in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the United States.

Authors:  Anshul Shah; Jonathan C Tosh; Apoorva Ambavane; Andreas Nikolaou; Cosmina Hogea; Yevgeniy Samyshkin; Boris Gorsh; Eric M Maiese; Feng Wang
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-09-10

Review 3.  Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework.

Authors:  Luca M M Janssen; Ruben M W A Drost; Aggie T G Paulus; Kirsty Garfield; William Hollingworth; Sian Noble; Joanna C Thorn; Irina Pokhilenko; Silvia M A A Evers
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.981

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.