Literature DB >> 27123878

Impact of Graft Selection on Donor and Recipient Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Hillary J Braun1, Jennifer L Dodge, Garrett R Roll, Chris E Freise, Nancy L Ascher, John P Roberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Balancing donor and recipient risks in living donor liver transplantation remains an issue of debate. This study assessed the impact of graft selection on outcomes and complications for left lobe (LL) versus right lobe (RL) donors and recipients.
METHODS: The medical records of donors and recipients, who underwent living donor liver transplantation at our institution between 2003 and 2015, were reviewed. For donors, we evaluated graft volume, residual liver volume per standard liver volume, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, and readmissions. For recipients, we looked at graft and patient survival, graft function at postoperative days 7 and 14, graft volume, LOS, biliary complications, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at transplant, and hepatitis C virus status.
RESULTS: At 5 years posttransplant, there were no significant differences in graft survival for LL recipients (86% [95% confidence interval, 74-93]) compared with 82% (95% confidence interval, 69-89) for RL recipients (P = 0.85) or recipient survival (90% vs 84%; P = 0.44). In LL recipients, postoperative days 7 and 14 median international normalized ratio (1.5 and 1.2, respectively) and total bilirubin (4.6 and 2.7) were significantly greater compared with RL recipients (7 and 14 days international normalized ratio [1.2, P < 0.001; 1.1, P = 0.001] and total bilirubin (2.7, P = 0.001; 2.1, P = 0.05)). The LL recipients also had a significantly greater median LOS (14 vs 10, P = 0.008). Median donor LOS was significantly greater for RL donors (7 [interquartile range, 7-8] vs 7 [interquartile range, 6-7] days, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The RL and LL grafts provide comparable long-term outcomes in properly selected donor-recipient pairs and the appropriate use of LL grafts does not impact graft or patient survival at 5 years posttransplant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27123878      PMCID: PMC4874840          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  11 in total

1.  A report of the Vancouver Forum on the care of the live organ donor: lung, liver, pancreas, and intestine data and medical guidelines.

Authors:  Mark L Barr; Jacques Belghiti; Federico G Villamil; Elizabeth A Pomfret; David S Sutherland; Rainer W Gruessner; Alan N Langnas; Francis L Delmonico
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Incidence of death and potentially life-threatening near-miss events in living donor hepatic lobectomy: a world-wide survey.

Authors:  Yee Lee Cheah; Mary Ann Simpson; James J Pomposelli; Elizabeth A Pomfret
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 3.  Challenges in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  James F Trotter
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.126

4.  Outcomes of 385 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients: a report from the A2ALL Consortium.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Robert M Merion; Rafik M Ghobrial; Michael M Abecassis; Jeffrey H Fair; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Igal Kam; Timothy L Pruett; James E Everhart; Tempie E Hulbert-Shearon; Brenda W Gillespie; Jean C Emond
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Liver transplant recipient survival benefit with living donation in the model for endstage liver disease allocation era.

Authors:  Carl L Berg; Robert M Merion; Tempie H Shearon; Kim M Olthoff; Robert S Brown; Talia B Baker; Gregory T Everson; Johnny C Hong; Norah Terrault; Paul H Hayashi; Robert A Fisher; James E Everhart
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 6.  A complete treatment of adult living donor liver transplantation: a review of surgical technique and current challenges to expand indication of patients.

Authors:  S-G Lee
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 7.  Left hepatectomy versus right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation: shifting the risk from the donor to the recipient.

Authors:  Garrett R Roll; Justin R Parekh; William F Parker; Mark Siegler; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Nancy L Ascher; John Paul Roberts
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Strategies for successful left-lobe living donor liver transplantation in 250 consecutive adult cases in a single center.

Authors:  Toru Ikegami; Ken Shirabe; Yuji Soejima; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Hideaki Uchiyama; Yo-ichi Yamashita; Norifumi Harimoto; Takeo Toshima; Shohei Yoshiya; Tetsuo Ikeda; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Donor morbidity in right and left hemiliver living donor liver transplantation: the impact of graft selection and surgical innovation on donor safety.

Authors:  Junji Iwasaki; Taku Iida; Masaki Mizumoto; Tadahiro Uemura; Shintaro Yagi; Tomohide Hori; Kohei Ogawa; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Akira Mori; Toshimi Kaido; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.782

10.  Donor morbidity after living donation for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Rafik M Ghobrial; Chris E Freise; James F Trotter; Lan Tong; Akinlolu O Ojo; Jeffrey H Fair; Robert A Fisher; Jean C Emond; Alan J Koffron; Timothy L Pruett; Kim M Olthoff
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Influence of bile duct anatomy on biliary complications in hepatic right lobe living donors].

Authors:  A Bauschke; A Altendorf-Hofmann; C Malessa; O Rohland; U Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  CON: Patients of Advanced Age Should Not Routinely Undergo Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Avash Kalra; Michael Kriss; Prashanth Francis; J P Norvell
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-09-02

Review 3.  Different techniques for harvesting grafts for living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Li; Jun-Bin Zhang; Xiao-Long Chen; Lei Fan; Li Wang; Shi-Hui Li; Qiao-Lan Zheng; Xiao-Ming Wang; Yang Yang; Gui-Hua Chen; Gen-Shu Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Outcomes of right-lobe and left-lobe living-donor liver transplantations using small-for-size grafts.

Authors:  Wong Hoi She; Kenneth Sh Chok; James Yy Fung; Albert Cy Chan; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A Formula to Calculate Standard Liver Volume Using Thoracoabdominal Circumference.

Authors:  Brian I Shaw; Lyle J Burdine; Hillary J Braun; Nancy L Ascher; John P Roberts
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-10-27

6.  Right anterior section graft for living-donor liver transplantation: A case report.

Authors:  Jonathan Geograpo Navarro; Gi Hong Choi; Myoung Soo Kim; Yoon Bin Jung; Jae Geun Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Bilateral proficiency over time leads to reduced donor morbidity in living donor hepatectomy.

Authors:  Viola Huang; Chao-Long Chen; Yu-Hung Lin; Tsan-Shiun Lin; Chih-Che Lin; Shih-Ho Wang; Chee-Chien Yong; Chih-Yi Chen; Yu-Fan Cheng
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.