| Literature DB >> 27123353 |
Masashi Koide1, Junichiro Hamada2, Yoshihiro Hagiwara1, Kenji Kanazawa1, Kazuaki Suzuki3.
Abstract
Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder (also known as frozen shoulder) is a painful and disabling disorder with an estimated prevalence ranging from 2% to 5% in the general population. Although the precise pathogenesis of frozen shoulder is unclear, thickened capsule and coracohumeral ligament (CHL) have been documented to be one of the most specific manifestations. The thickened CHL has been understood to limit external rotation of the shoulder, and restriction of internal rotation of the shoulder has been believed to be related to posterior capsular tightness. In this paper, three cases of refractory frozen shoulder treated through arthroscopic release of a contracted capsule including CHL were reported. Two cases in which there is recalcitrant severe restriction of internal rotation after manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) were finally treated with arthroscopic surgery. Although MUA could release the posterior capsule, internal rotation did not improve in our cases. After release of the thickened CHL, range of motion of internal rotation was significantly improved. This report demonstrates the role of the thickened CHL in limiting the internal rotation of the shoulder. We highlight the importance of release of thickened CHL in addition to the pancapsular release, in case of severe limitation of internal rotation of shoulder.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27123353 PMCID: PMC4829705 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9384974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Orthop ISSN: 2090-6757
Range of motion and visual analogue scale of Cases 1, 2, and 3.
| AE | LE | 1st ER | HBB | HF | 2nd ER | 2nd IR | 3rd ER | 3rd IR | VAS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| The initial visit | 70 | 70 | 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7.7 |
| Rehabilitation for 2 months | 90 | 80 | 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 6.4 |
| After op for 8.6 months | 165 | 160 | 65 |
|
| 90 |
| 95 |
| 0.6 |
|
| ||||||||||
| The initial visit | 110 | 75 | 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 6.4 |
| After MUA for 2 months | 155 | 140 | 50 |
|
| 85 |
| 95 |
| 5.0 |
| After op for 4.0 months | 170 | 180 | 60 |
|
| 100 |
| 105 |
| 0 |
|
| ||||||||||
| The initial visit | 110 | 90 | 45 |
|
| 70 |
| 80 |
| 4.4 |
| After rehabilitation for 6 months | 150 | 110 | 70 |
|
| 90 |
| 100 |
| 2.4 |
| After op for 3.3 months | 180 | 180 | 70 |
|
| 90 |
| 110 |
| 0 |
Internal rotation (bold font) is significantly improved after arthroscopic capsular release. The 2nd ER and IR and the 3rd ER and IR (italic font) were measured at the maximum range of motion of elevation.
AE: anterior elevation; LE: lateral elevation; 1st ER: external rotation in adduction of the shoulder joint; HBB: the highest posterior spinal level reached when hand is behind back; HF: horizontal flexion; 2nd ER: external rotation in 90 degrees of lateral elevation; 2nd IR: internal rotation in 90 degrees of anterior elevation; 3rd ER: external rotation in 90 degrees of anterior flexion; 3rd IR: internal rotation in 90 degrees of anterior elevation; VAS: visual analogue scale.
Figure 1Arthroscopic findings in Case 1. SSC: subscapularis; RI: rotator interval; HH: humeral head; CP: coracoid process; PIGHL: posterior band of inferior glenoid humeral ligament. (a) Arrow shows that the posterior capsule was cut with a fresh stump. (b) Thickened RI and CHL remained. (c) Thickened anterior side of the CHL can be seen from the joint side.
Figure 2Arthroscopic findings in Case 2. LHB: long head of the biceps tendon. (a) Posterior capsule was partially ruptured by manipulation under anesthesia. (b) Before release of the rotator interval. (c) Proliferation of bursa and adhesion of the superior capsule.
Figure 3Arthroscopic findings in Case 3. (a) Synovial proliferation in the rotator interval and the superomedial capsule. (b) The CHL from the coracoid process to the LHB was thickened and inflamed.