BACKGROUND: Impaired admission glucose (AG) is thought to significantly increase the risk of both early and late death with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), especially for non-diabetic patients. However, several earlier studies contradict these relationships. Through our meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate such a relation between impaired AG, the risk of death and STEMI. METHODS: We accessed PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library and systematically searched their databases to identify all related prospective cohort studies. The relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled quantitatively. RESULTS: The pooled, unadjusted relative risks of early outcome events indicated that patients who had glucose concentrations ≥ the range of 6.1-11.1 mmol/L, had a 4.38-fold (95% CI, 3.23-5.94) higher early mortality. For late outcome events, the pooled unadjusted RR indicated patients who had glucose concentrations ≥ the range 7.8-11.1 mmol/L, and had a 2.69-fold (95% CI, 2.16-3.34) higher late mortality based on full participants, whereas patients had a 1.65-fold (95% CI, 1.33-2.04) higher late mortality based on based on in-hospital or 30-day survivors. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the present meta-analysis demonstrated that impaired admission glucose may be an effective prognostic marker for significantly increased risk of early death. Regarding the long-term outcomes based on full population or early survival, high admission glucose also has a distinct but poorer prognostic impact on long-term mortality than early mortality. KEY WORDS: Admission glucose • Meta-analysis • Myocardial infarction • Non-diabetic.
BACKGROUND: Impaired admission glucose (AG) is thought to significantly increase the risk of both early and late death with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), especially for non-diabeticpatients. However, several earlier studies contradict these relationships. Through our meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate such a relation between impaired AG, the risk of death and STEMI. METHODS: We accessed PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library and systematically searched their databases to identify all related prospective cohort studies. The relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled quantitatively. RESULTS: The pooled, unadjusted relative risks of early outcome events indicated that patients who had glucose concentrations ≥ the range of 6.1-11.1 mmol/L, had a 4.38-fold (95% CI, 3.23-5.94) higher early mortality. For late outcome events, the pooled unadjusted RR indicated patients who had glucose concentrations ≥ the range 7.8-11.1 mmol/L, and had a 2.69-fold (95% CI, 2.16-3.34) higher late mortality based on full participants, whereas patients had a 1.65-fold (95% CI, 1.33-2.04) higher late mortality based on based on in-hospital or 30-day survivors. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the present meta-analysis demonstrated that impaired admission glucose may be an effective prognostic marker for significantly increased risk of early death. Regarding the long-term outcomes based on full population or early survival, high admission glucose also has a distinct but poorer prognostic impact on long-term mortality than early mortality. KEY WORDS: Admission glucose • Meta-analysis • Myocardial infarction • Non-diabetic.
Authors: Loes P Hoebers; Peter Damman; Bimmer E Claessen; Marije M Vis; Jan Baan; Jan P van Straalen; Johan Fischer; Karel T Koch; Jan G P Tijssen; Robbert J de Winter; Jan J Piek; Jose P S Henriques Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Mariusz Gasior; Damian Pres; Gabriela Stasik-Pres; Piotr Lech; Marek Gierlotka; Michał Hawranek; Krzysztof Wilczek; Bozena Szyguła-Jurkiewicz; Andrzej Lekston; Zbigniew Kalarus; Krzysztof Strojek; Janusz Gumprecht; Lech Poloński Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Marije M Vis; Krischan D Sjauw; René J van der Schaaf; Jan Baan; Karel T Koch; J Hans DeVries; Jan G P Tijssen; Robbert J de Winter; Jan J Piek; José P S Henriques Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-09-12 Impact factor: 4.749