Agnieszka Mlynarska1, Rafal Mlynarski2, Maciej Sosnowski3. 1. Department of Internal Nursing, Chair of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Silesia; ; Department of Electrocardiology; ; Unit of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Diagnostics, Upper Silesian Medical Centre; 2. Department of Electrocardiology; ; Unit of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Diagnostics, Upper Silesian Medical Centre; 3. Unit of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Diagnostics, Upper Silesian Medical Centre; ; 3rd Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The factors that determine the different patterns of venous anatomy are not well understood. This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between variation in the cardiac vein system and the extent of coronary artery calcium score (CACS). METHODS: We reviewed the results of 64-slice CTs of 226 subjects (age 57.2 ± 11.2; 133M) enrolled in our study. The subjects were divided into 3 groups based on coronary artery calcium: 92 patients. with CACS = 0 AU (Agatston Unit, AU); 56 with CACS = 1-100 AU; and 78 patients with CACS > than 100 AU. The cardiac venous system was reconstructed during the optimal phase of the cardiac cycle in each subject. RESULTS: Subjects with a higher CACS had a better quality of vein images (p < 0.01). The number of visible veins differed between the groups. Eight subjects (8.7%) in the group with CACS = 0 AU, 7 (12.5%) in the group with CACS = 1-100 AU, and 23 (29.5%) in the group with CACS > 100 AU had five or more visible veins (p < 0.001), whereas the proportion of subjects with less than three visible veins was 56 (60.8%), 31 (55.4%) and 30 (38.4%), respectively (p < 0.05). The number of visible veins correlated with CACS (r = 0.28; p < 0.05). In a multivariate regression analysis, which included age, gender, CACS, LV ejection fraction, myocardial volume and heart rate, the CACS was found to be an independent determinant of the number of visible veins (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggested that there is a link between a variation in the cardiac venous system and the extent of atherosclerosis. KEY WORDS: Coronary artery calcium score (CACS); Computed tomography; Coronary veins.
BACKGROUND: The factors that determine the different patterns of venous anatomy are not well understood. This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between variation in the cardiac vein system and the extent of coronary artery calcium score (CACS). METHODS: We reviewed the results of 64-slice CTs of 226 subjects (age 57.2 ± 11.2; 133M) enrolled in our study. The subjects were divided into 3 groups based on coronary artery calcium: 92 patients. with CACS = 0 AU (Agatston Unit, AU); 56 with CACS = 1-100 AU; and 78 patients with CACS > than 100 AU. The cardiac venous system was reconstructed during the optimal phase of the cardiac cycle in each subject. RESULTS: Subjects with a higher CACS had a better quality of vein images (p < 0.01). The number of visible veins differed between the groups. Eight subjects (8.7%) in the group with CACS = 0 AU, 7 (12.5%) in the group with CACS = 1-100 AU, and 23 (29.5%) in the group with CACS > 100 AU had five or more visible veins (p < 0.001), whereas the proportion of subjects with less than three visible veins was 56 (60.8%), 31 (55.4%) and 30 (38.4%), respectively (p < 0.05). The number of visible veins correlated with CACS (r = 0.28; p < 0.05). In a multivariate regression analysis, which included age, gender, CACS, LV ejection fraction, myocardial volume and heart rate, the CACS was found to be an independent determinant of the number of visible veins (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggested that there is a link between a variation in the cardiac venous system and the extent of atherosclerosis. KEY WORDS: Coronary artery calcium score (CACS); Computed tomography; Coronary veins.
Authors: Murat Yuce; Vedat Davutoglu; Sema Yavuz; Ibrahim Sari; Nese Kizilkan; Suleyman Ercan; Murat Akcay; Cayan Akkoyun; Adnan Dogan; Hayri Alici; Murat Cavdar; Hasan Buyukarslan Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Xueqian Xie; Yingru Zhao; Geertruida H de Bock; Pim A de Jong; Willem P Mali; Matthijs Oudkerk; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Allen J Taylor; Manuel Cerqueira; John McB Hodgson; Daniel Mark; James Min; Patrick O'Gara; Geoffrey D Rubin Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2010-11-23
Authors: Lori M Tam; Joonseok Kim; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Michael J Blaha Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Joep Perk; Guy De Backer; Helmut Gohlke; Ian Graham; Zeljko Reiner; Monique Verschuren; Christian Albus; Pascale Benlian; Gudrun Boysen; Renata Cifkova; Christi Deaton; Shah Ebrahim; Miles Fisher; Giuseppe Germano; Richard Hobbs; Arno Hoes; Sehnaz Karadeniz; Alessandro Mezzani; Eva Prescott; Lars Ryden; Martin Scherer; Mikko Syvänne; Wilma J M Scholte op Reimer; Christiaan Vrints; David Wood; Jose Luis Zamorano; Faiez Zannad Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 29.983