Antoninus O Ezeukwu1, Elias O Agwubike2, Patrick O Uadia3. 1. Department of Medical Rehabilitation, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus; 2. Department of Human Kinetics and Sports Science; 3. Department of Biochemistry, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The process of atherogenicity is known to be influenced by exercise. However, appropriate exercise stimulus necessary to generate the response and adaptation in sedentary non-obese individuals has not yet been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of an 8-week continuous training and corresponding interval training on the atherogenic index of plasma in sedentary Nigerian males. METHODS: Overall, there were 54 male university students that participated in our study, which used a pretest- posttest control group design. Participants (18 males per group) were assigned into continuous, interval and control groups respectively. During the first two weeks, training was done 3 times weekly for 30 minutes each day, and was increased by 5 minutes every 2 weeks. Continuous training was done at 70-84% of heart rate reserve. Interval training was done at 70-84%/30-39% heart rate reserve in 1:2 minutes work/rest intervals, respectively. The control group did not participate in the training. Data collected were analysed using descriptive, paired t-test, analysis of covariance and Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. RESULTS:Young sedentary non-obese males were at high risk (atherogenic index of plasma > 0.24) of cardiovascular diseases/conditions. However, continuous training led to significant reductions (p = 0.002) in the atherogenic index of plasma. In contrast, non-significant increase (p = 0.084) followed interval training. After controlling for baseline values, only continuous training still had significant effects on atherogenic index of plasma when compared with other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous training of vigorous intensity is better than a corresponding interval training protocol as a natural anti-atherogenic method of reducing risk of cardiovascular event in sedentary non-obese males. KEY WORDS: Atherogenicity; Cholesterol; Exercise; Training; Vigorous.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The process of atherogenicity is known to be influenced by exercise. However, appropriate exercise stimulus necessary to generate the response and adaptation in sedentary non-obese individuals has not yet been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of an 8-week continuous training and corresponding interval training on the atherogenic index of plasma in sedentary Nigerian males. METHODS: Overall, there were 54 male university students that participated in our study, which used a pretest- posttest control group design. Participants (18 males per group) were assigned into continuous, interval and control groups respectively. During the first two weeks, training was done 3 times weekly for 30 minutes each day, and was increased by 5 minutes every 2 weeks. Continuous training was done at 70-84% of heart rate reserve. Interval training was done at 70-84%/30-39% heart rate reserve in 1:2 minutes work/rest intervals, respectively. The control group did not participate in the training. Data collected were analysed using descriptive, paired t-test, analysis of covariance and Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Young sedentary non-obese males were at high risk (atherogenic index of plasma > 0.24) of cardiovascular diseases/conditions. However, continuous training led to significant reductions (p = 0.002) in the atherogenic index of plasma. In contrast, non-significant increase (p = 0.084) followed interval training. After controlling for baseline values, only continuous training still had significant effects on atherogenic index of plasma when compared with other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous training of vigorous intensity is better than a corresponding interval training protocol as a natural anti-atherogenic method of reducing risk of cardiovascular event in sedentary non-obese males. KEY WORDS: Atherogenicity; Cholesterol; Exercise; Training; Vigorous.
Authors: William B Strong; Robert M Malina; Cameron J R Blimkie; Stephen R Daniels; Rodney K Dishman; Bernard Gutin; Albert C Hergenroeder; Aviva Must; Patricia A Nixon; James M Pivarnik; Thomas Rowland; Stewart Trost; François Trudeau Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: William E Kraus; Joseph A Houmard; Brian D Duscha; Kenneth J Knetzger; Michelle B Wharton; Jennifer S McCartney; Connie W Bales; Sarah Henes; Gregory P Samsa; James D Otvos; Krishnaji R Kulkarni; Cris A Slentz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-11-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K Meyer; L Samek; M Schwaibold; S Westbrook; R Hajric; M Lehmann; D Essfeld; H Roskamm Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: David Michel de Oliveira; Grace Kelly Zanotti Simoes Dourado; Thais Borges Cesar Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 5.150