Literature DB >> 2712278

A comparison of fifteen pulse oximeters. Part I: A clinical comparison; Part II: A test of performance under conditions of poor perfusion.

R W Morris1, M Nairn, T A Torda.   

Abstract

Fifteen pulse oximeters were compared. Their physical characteristics, price, warranty, information handling and displays were catalogued. Times for changes in data display and susceptibility to interference were assessed. A model for comparison of oximeters under conditions of poor perfusion was developed using a tourniquet to progressively diminish limb perfusion pressure (systolic minus tourniquet pressure). The oximeters evidenced a wide variety of features and performance in poor perfusion states. Instruments lacking a beep varying in pitch with saturation or a waveform/pulse bar display of plethysmograph signal were considered less satisfactory. The majority of instruments, with some notable exceptions, performed remarkably well in a state of diminished perfusion. The study demonstrates that purchasers of pulse oximeters need to exercise care in assessing the suitability of particular instruments to their specific requirements.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2712278     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X8901700113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  6 in total

1.  Pulse oximeter signal at various blood flow conditions in an in vitro model.

Authors:  L G Lindberg; M Vegfors; C Lennmarken; P A Oberg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Misleading information from pulse oximetry and the usefulness of continuous blood gas monitoring in a post cardiac surgery patient.

Authors:  J P Benson; B Venkatesh; V Patla
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A comparison of finger and forehead pulse oximeters in heart failure patients during maximal exercise.

Authors:  Kevin L Kelly; Alex R Carlson; Thomas G Allison; Bruce D Johnson
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Failure rate of pulse oximetry in the postanesthesia care unit.

Authors:  B S Gillies; K Posner; P Freund; F Cheney
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-11

5.  Pulse oximeter accuracy and precision at five different sensor locations in infants and children with cyanotic heart disease.

Authors:  Jyotirmoy Das; Amit Aggarwal; Naresh Kumar Aggarwal
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-11

6.  Pulse oximetry.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.