Literature DB >> 27122550

Evidence for r- and K-selection in a wild bird population: a reciprocal link between ecology and evolution.

Bernt-Erik Sæther1, Marcel E Visser2, Vidar Grøtan3, Steinar Engen4.   

Abstract

Understanding the variation in selection pressure on key life-history traits is crucial in our rapidly changing world. Density is rarely considered as a selective agent. To study its importance, we partition phenotypic selection in fluctuating environments into components representing the population growth rate at low densities and the strength of density dependence, using a new stochastic modelling framework. We analysed the number of eggs laid per season in a small song-bird, the great tit, and found balancing selection favouring large clutch sizes at small population densities and smaller clutches in years with large populations. A significant interaction between clutch size and population size in the regression for the Malthusian fitness reveals that those females producing large clutch sizes at small population sizes also are those that show the strongest reduction in fitness when population size is increased. This provides empirical support for ongoing r- and K-selection in this population, favouring phenotypes with large growth rates r at small population sizes and phenotypes with high competitive skills when populations are close to the carrying capacity K This selection causes long-term fluctuations around a stable mean clutch size caused by variation in population size, implying that r- and K-selection is an important mechanism influencing phenotypic evolution in fluctuating environments. This provides a general link between ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, operating through a joint influence of density dependence and environmental stochasticity on fluctuations in population size.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  density dependence; density-dependent selection; environmental stochasticity; great tit; phenotypic evolution; r- and K-selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27122550      PMCID: PMC4855372          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  32 in total

1.  Effective size of a fluctuating age-structured population.

Authors:  Steinar Engen; Russell Lande; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  An evolutionary maximum principle for density-dependent population dynamics in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Solving the paradox of stasis: squashed stabilizing selection and the limits of detection.

Authors:  Benjamin C Haller; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Evolution in fluctuating environments: decomposing selection into additive components of the Robertson-Price equation.

Authors:  Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics.

Authors:  R M May
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Evolutionary consequences of nonselective harvesting in density-dependent populations.

Authors:  Steinar Engen; Russell Lande; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  A quantitative genetic model of r- and K-selection in a fluctuating population.

Authors:  Steinar Engen; Russell Lande; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Estimating phenotypic selection in age-structured populations by removing transient fluctuations.

Authors:  Steinar Engen; Thomas Kvalnes; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 9.  Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon; L E Kruuk
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Phenological mismatch strongly affects individual fitness but not population demography in a woodland passerine.

Authors:  Thomas E Reed; Stephanie Jenouvrier; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evolution of stochastic demography with life history tradeoffs in density-dependent age-structured populations.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Density-dependent selection and the maintenance of colour polymorphism in barn owls.

Authors:  Thomas Kvalnes; Bernt-Erik Sæther; Steinar Engen; Alexandre Roulin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Inter-class competition in stage-structured populations: effects of adult density on life-history traits of adult and juvenile common lizards.

Authors:  Luis M San-Jose; Miguel Peñalver-Alcázar; Katleen Huyghe; Merel C Breedveld; Patrick S Fitze
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Phenological mismatch drives selection on elevation, but not on slope, of breeding time plasticity in a wild songbird.

Authors:  Jip J C Ramakers; Phillip Gienapp; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Bet-hedging across generations can affect the evolution of variance-sensitive strategies within generations.

Authors:  Thomas R Haaland; Jonathan Wright; Irja I Ratikainen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Fitness, risk taking, and spatial behavior covary with boldness in experimental vole populations.

Authors:  Jana A Eccard; Antje Herde; Andrea C Schuster; Thilo Liesenjohann; Tatjana Knopp; Gerald Heckel; Melanie Dammhahn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Evolution of population dynamics following invasion by a non-native predator.

Authors:  Sigurd Einum; Emil R Ullern; Matthew Walsh; Tim Burton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Contrasting patterns of density-dependent selection at different life stages can create more than one fast-slow axis of life-history variation.

Authors:  Jonathan Wright; Erik Blystad Solbu; Steinar Engen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Reduced phenotypic plasticity evolves in less predictable environments.

Authors:  Christelle Leung; Marie Rescan; Daphné Grulois; Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 9.492

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.