Literature DB >> 27122371

Role of aortic arch vascular mechanics in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity.

Stephen A Klassen1, Daniele Chirico1, Kylie S Dempster1, J Kevin Shoemaker2, Deborah D O'Leary3.   

Abstract

Cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (cvBRS) measures the efficiency of the cardiovagal baroreflex to modulate heart rate in response to increases or decreases in systolic blood pressure (SBP). Given that baroreceptors are located in the walls of the carotid sinuses (CS) and aortic arch (AA), the arterial mechanics of these sites are important contributors to cvBRS. However, the relative contribution of CS and AA mechanics to cvBRS remains unclear. This study employed sex differences as a model to test the hypothesis that differences in cvBRS between groups would be explained by the vascular mechanics of the AA but not the CS. Thirty-six young, healthy, normotensive individuals (18 females; 24 ± 2 yr) were recruited. cvBRS was measured using transfer function analysis of the low-frequency region (0.04-0.15 Hz). Ultrasonography was performed at the CS and AA to obtain arterial diameters for the measurement of distensibility. Local pulse pressure (PP) was taken at the CS using a hand-held tonometer, whereas AA PP was estimated using a transfer function of brachial PP. Both cvBRS (25 ± 11 vs. 19 ± 7 ms/mmHg, P = 0.04) and AA distensibility (16.5 ± 6.0 vs. 10.5 ± 3.8 mmHg(-1) × 10(-3), P = 0.02) were greater in females than males. Sex differences in cvBRS were eliminated after controlling for AA distensibility (P = 0.19). There were no sex differences in CS distensibility (5.32 ± 2.3 vs. 4.63 ± 1.3 mmHg(-1) × 10(-3), P = 0.32). The present data demonstrate that AA mechanics are an important contributor to differences in cvBRS.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic arch; cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity; carotid sinus; distensibility; vascular mechanics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27122371     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00491.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  4 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in baroreflex function in health and disease.

Authors:  Qi Fu; Shigehiko Ogoh
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Poor perinatal growth impairs baboon aortic windkessel function.

Authors:  A H Kuo; J Li; C Li; H F Huber; P W Nathanielsz; G D Clarke
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Men Show Reduced Cardiac Baroreceptor Sensitivity during Modestly Painful Electrical Stimulation of the Forearm: Exploratory Results from a Sham-Controlled Crossover Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Veiz; Susann-Kristin Kieslich; Julia Staab; Dirk Czesnik; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen; Thomas Meyer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Baroreceptors in the Aortic Arch and Their Potential Role in Aortic Dissection and Aneurysms.

Authors:  Benedikt Reutersberg; Jaroslav Pelisek; Ahmed Ouda; Olivier de Rougemont; Fabian Rössler; Alexander Zimmermann
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.