Literature DB >> 27122031

Decoding the Charitable Brain: Empathy, Perspective Taking, and Attention Shifts Differentially Predict Altruistic Giving.

Anita Tusche1, Anne Böckler2, Philipp Kanske2, Fynn-Mathis Trautwein2, Tania Singer2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Altruistic behavior varies considerably across people and decision contexts. The relevant computational and motivational mechanisms that underlie its heterogeneity, however, are poorly understood. Using a charitable giving task together with multivariate decoding techniques, we identified three distinct psychological mechanisms underlying altruistic decision-making (empathy, perspective taking, and attentional reorienting) and linked them to dissociable neural computations. Neural responses in the anterior insula (AI) (but not temporoparietal junction [TPJ]) encoded trial-wise empathy for beneficiaries, whereas the TPJ (but not AI) predicted the degree of perspective taking. Importantly, the relative influence of both socio-cognitive processes differed across individuals: participants whose donation behavior was heavily influenced by affective empathy exhibited higher predictive accuracies for generosity in AI, whereas those who strongly relied on cognitive perspective taking showed improved predictions of generous donations in TPJ. Furthermore, subject-specific contributions of both processes for donations were reflected in participants' empathy and perspective taking responses in a separate fMRI task (EmpaToM), suggesting that process-specific inputs into altruistic choices may reflect participants' general propensity to either empathize or mentalize. Finally, using independent attention task data, we identified shared neural codes for attentional reorienting and generous donations in the posterior superior temporal sulcus, suggesting that domain-general attention shifts also contribute to generous behavior (but not in TPJ or AI). Overall, our findings demonstrate highly specific roles of AI for affective empathy and TPJ for cognitive perspective taking as precursors of prosocial behavior and suggest that these discrete routes of social cognition differentially drive intraindividual and interindividual differences in altruistic behavior. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Human societies depend on the altruistic behavior of their members, but teasing apart its underlying motivations and neural mechanisms poses a serious challenge. Using multivariate decoding techniques, we delineated three distinct processes for altruistic decision-making (affective empathy, cognitive perspective taking, and domain-general attention shifts), linked them to dissociable neural computations, and identified their relative influence across individuals. Distinguishing process-specific computations both behaviorally and neurally is crucial for developing complete theoretical and neuroscientific accounts of altruistic behavior and more effective means of increasing it. Moreover, information on the relative influence of subprocesses across individuals and its link to people's more general propensity to engage empathy or perspective taking can inform training programs to increase prosociality, considering their "fit" with different individuals.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/364719-14$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fMRI; mentalizing; multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA); prosocial decision-making; social cognition; theory of mind (ToM)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27122031      PMCID: PMC6601722          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3392-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  67 in total

1.  Extraordinary Altruists Exhibit Enhanced Self-Other Overlap in Neural Responses to Distress.

Authors:  Kristin M Brethel-Haurwitz; Elise M Cardinale; Kruti M Vekaria; Emily L Robertson; Brian Walitt; John W VanMeter; Abigail A Marsh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-08-21

2.  Are strong empathizers better mentalizers? Evidence for independence and interaction between the routes of social cognition.

Authors:  Philipp Kanske; Anne Böckler; Fynn-Mathis Trautwein; Franca H Parianen Lesemann; Tania Singer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  From faces to prosocial behavior: cues, tools, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Ralph Adolphs; Anita Tusche
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14

4.  Computational and Neurobiological Substrates of Cost-Benefit Integration in Altruistic Helping Decision.

Authors:  Jie Hu; Yang Hu; Yue Li; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural response to prosocial scenes relates to subsequent giving behavior in adolescents: A pilot study.

Authors:  Sarah M Tashjian; David G Weissman; Amanda E Guyer; Adriana Galván
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Effects of Oxytocin and Vasopressin on Preferential Brain Responses to Negative Social Feedback.

Authors:  Marta Gozzi; Erica M Dashow; Audrey Thurm; Susan E Swedo; Caroline F Zink
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Cognitive regulation alters social and dietary choice by changing attribute representations in domain-general and domain-specific brain circuits.

Authors:  Anita Tusche; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Medical students' empathy positively predicts charitable donation behavior.

Authors:  Karen E Smith; Greg J Norman; Jean Decety
Journal:  J Posit Psychol       Date:  2019-08-09

9.  Accounting for Taste: A Multi-Attribute Neurocomputational Model Explains the Neural Dynamics of Choices for Self and Others.

Authors:  Alison Harris; John A Clithero; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Right Temporoparietal Junction Underlies Avoidance of Moral Transgression in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Yang Hu; Alessandra M Pereira; Xiaoxue Gao; Brunno M Campos; Edmund Derrington; Brice Corgnet; Xiaolin Zhou; Fernando Cendes; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.