Literature DB >> 27121994

An EEG-Based Fatigue Detection and Mitigation System.

Kuan-Chih Huang1,2, Teng-Yi Huang2, Chun-Hsiang Chuang3, Jung-Tai King2, Yu-Kai Wang2, Chin-Teng Lin1,3,4, Tzyy-Ping Jung4,5.   

Abstract

Research has indicated that fatigue is a critical factor in cognitive lapses because it negatively affects an individual's internal state, which is then manifested physiologically. This study explores neurophysiological changes, measured by electroencephalogram (EEG), due to fatigue. This study further demonstrates the feasibility of an online closed-loop EEG-based fatigue detection and mitigation system that detects physiological change and can thereby prevent fatigue-related cognitive lapses. More importantly, this work compares the efficacy of fatigue detection and mitigation between the EEG-based and a nonEEG-based random method. Twelve healthy subjects participated in a sustained-attention driving experiment. Each participant's EEG signal was monitored continuously and a warning was delivered in real-time to participants once the EEG signature of fatigue was detected. Study results indicate suppression of the alpha- and theta-power of an occipital component and improved behavioral performance following a warning signal; these findings are in line with those in previous studies. However, study results also showed reduced warning efficacy (i.e. increased response times (RTs) to lane deviations) accompanied by increased alpha-power due to the fluctuation of warnings over time. Furthermore, a comparison of EEG-based and nonEEG-based random approaches clearly demonstrated the necessity of adaptive fatigue-mitigation systems, based on a subject's cognitive level, to deliver warnings. Analytical results clearly demonstrate and validate the efficacy of this online closed-loop EEG-based fatigue detection and mitigation mechanism to identify cognitive lapses that may lead to catastrophic incidents in countless operational environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; auditory feedback; brain dynamics; driving safety; fatigue

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27121994     DOI: 10.1142/S0129065716500180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neural Syst        ISSN: 0129-0657            Impact factor:   5.866


  9 in total

Review 1.  What is nausea? A historical analysis of changing views.

Authors:  Carey D Balaban; Bill J Yates
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.145

2.  Automatic Detection of Driver Fatigue Using Driving Operation Information for Transportation Safety.

Authors:  Zuojin Li; Liukui Chen; Jun Peng; Ying Wu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  EEG-Based Driving Fatigue Detection Using a Two-Level Learning Hierarchy Radial Basis Function.

Authors:  Ziwu Ren; Rihui Li; Bin Chen; Hongmiao Zhang; Yuliang Ma; Chushan Wang; Ying Lin; Yingchun Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Multi-Parameter Physiological State Monitoring in Target Detection Under Real-World Settings.

Authors:  Yang Chang; Congying He; Bo-Yu Tsai; Li-Wei Ko
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Improving EEG-Based Driver Distraction Classification Using Brain Connectivity Estimators.

Authors:  Dulan Perera; Yu-Kai Wang; Chin-Teng Lin; Hung Nguyen; Rifai Chai
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Theta and Alpha Oscillations in Attentional Interaction during Distracted Driving.

Authors:  Yu-Kai Wang; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Chin-Teng Lin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Brain Electrodynamic and Hemodynamic Signatures Against Fatigue During Driving.

Authors:  Chun-Hsiang Chuang; Zehong Cao; Jung-Tai King; Bing-Syun Wu; Yu-Kai Wang; Chin-Teng Lin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Brain Network Changes in Fatigued Drivers: A Longitudinal Study in a Real-World Environment Based on the Effective Connectivity Analysis and Actigraphy Data.

Authors:  André Fonseca; Scott Kerick; Jung-Tai King; Chin-Teng Lin; Tzyy-Ping Jung
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The effects of different fatigue levels on brain-behavior relationships in driving.

Authors:  Kuan-Chih Huang; Chun-Hsiang Chuang; Yu-Kai Wang; Chi-Yuan Hsieh; Jung-Tai King; Chin-Teng Lin
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.708

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.