| Literature DB >> 27121641 |
Michael Elvey1, S Patel2, Erez Avisar3, W J White4, E Sorene2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The nonspecific terms "wrist sprain" and "suspected occult bony injury" are frequently documented as diagnoses in occult paediatric wrist injuries. To date, however, no one has accurately defined their true underlying pathology. The primary objective of this study was to identify the true pathoanatomy of occult acute paediatric wrist injuries. Our secondary objective was to compare our findings with existing adult data in order to determine any population differences that might be clinically relevant.Entities:
Keywords: Occult wrist injury; Paediatric wrist injury; Wrist trauma
Year: 2016 PMID: 27121641 PMCID: PMC4909650 DOI: 10.1007/s11832-016-0735-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Paediatric MRI findings
| Finding on MRI | Number |
|---|---|
| Fracture | |
| Distal radius | 11 |
| Scaphoid | |
| Distal pole | 3 |
| Waist | 3 |
| Trapezoid | 1 |
| Lunate | 1 |
| Ulnar styloid | 3 |
| Contusion | |
| Distal radius | 9 |
| Scaphoid | 7 |
| Ulnar styloid | 2 |
| Trapezoid | 3 |
| Lunate | 1 |
| Soft-tissue injury | |
| TFCC injury | |
| Sprain | 3 |
| Tear | 1 |
| Tenosynovitis | 2 |
| DRUJ injury | 1 |
| Extrinsic sprain | 1 |
| Ganglion | 8 |
Fig. 1Comparison between clinical and MRI diagnoses
Comparison between paediatric and adult MRI findings
| Current study | Bergh et al. [ | Pierre-Jerome et al. [ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. patients | 57 | 155 | 125 |
| Median age (range) | 12 (8–16) | 28 (18–49) | n/a (adult) |
| F:M | 1:1 | 1:1.2 | 1:1.3 |
| Overall incidence OBI (%) | 69.6 | 71.0 | 62.4 |
| Median positive findings/pt | 1 (0–3) | 2 (0–8) | (2–6)a |
| Occult fracture | |||
| Total | 23 (36.5 %) | 44 (28.0 %) | 29 (23.2 %) |
| % Distal radius | 52.2 | 25.9 | 38 |
| % Scaphoid | 26.1 | 25.9 | 31 |
| % Ulnar styloid (Fig. | 13 | 3.7 | n/a |
| % Lunate | 3.4 | 0 | n/a |
| % Trapezoid | 3.4 | 1.9 | n/a |
| % Triquetrum | 0 | 11.1 | n/a |
| % Pisiform | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| % Trapezium | 0 | 1.2 | n/a |
| % Capitate | 0 | 8 | n/a |
| % Hamate | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Bone contusion | |||
| Total | 22 (35 %) | 33 (22 %) | 49 (39 %) |
| % Distal radius | 40.1 | 12.5 | 23.7 |
| % Scaphoid | 31.2 | 16.1 | 26.7 |
| % Ulnar styloid | 9.1 | 3.5 | n/a |
| % Lunate | 4.5 | 10.7 | 22.1 |
| Soft tissue | |||
| Total | 8 (14.5 %) | 41 (26.4) | n/a |
| % TFCC injury | 50 | 34.1 | n/a |
| % Scapholunate injury | 0 | 11.2 | n/a |
| % Partial tendon rupture | 0 | 15.9 | n/a |
| % Tenosynovitis | 25 | 13.6 | n/a |
| % DRUJ injury | 12.5 | n/a | n/a |
| % Extrinsic sprain | 12.5 | 18.8 | n/a |
OBI occult bony injury
aNo median provided
Fig. 2Coronal PD fat sat: intense marrow oedema within the distal radius metaphysis. Small linear area consistent with trabecular fracture
Fig. 3a Coronal oblique T1, b coronal oblique PD fat sat: undisplaced transverse fracture line extending through the midpole of the left scaphoid. Associated with pronounced bone marrow oedema and periosteal signal change
Fig. 4Coronal PD fat sat: bone bruising within right trapezoid bone centered distally and toward palmar surface. This is associated with an undisplaced low signal fracture line