Literature DB >> 2712132

Threshold equivalence between perimeters.

D R Anderson1, W J Feuer, W L Alward, G L Skuta.   

Abstract

To determine equivalence between perimeters, 49 eyes of 35 subjects underwent static threshold testing of the central 30 degrees twice on each of three automated perimeters and twice by manual kinetic threshold testing with the Goldmann perimeter. The Octopus-Humphrey difference was 3.3 dB (2.3 dB in the upper two rows for programs 32 and 30-2). The Dicon-Octopus difference was 3.5 dB and the Dicon-Humphrey, 6.5 dB. The I4e stimulus of the Goldmann perimeter was equivalent to 17.1 dB, 13.6 dB, and 10.8 dB on the Humphrey, Octopus, and Dicon perimeters, respectively. The III4e stimulus of the Goldmann perimeter, used for visual impairment determination, was roughly equivalent to 7 to 10 dB, 4 to 7 dB, and 0 to 6 dB on the Humphrey, Octopus, and Dicon perimeters, respectively. The prediction when converting from one instrument to another was only 10% less reliable than the ability of a perimeter to predict the values on a second examination with the same perimeter. Validity of the conversion formulas was confirmed by the age-corrected normal values available for the Octopus, Humphrey, and Goldmann perimeters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2712132     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90493-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  7 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin A and fish oils for retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Sobharani Rayapudi; Stephen G Schwartz; Xue Wang; Pamela Chavis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-19

2.  Formulas for conversion between Octopus and Humphrey threshold values and indices.

Authors:  T Zeyen; M Roche; L Brigatti; J Caprioli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Normal visual fields measured with Octopus Program G1. I. Differential light sensitivity at individual test locations.

Authors:  M Zulauf
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser.

Authors:  Geeta Behera; Shradha Vijay Waghmare; Amala Ramasamy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.029

5.  Relationship between visual field loss and contrast threshold elevation in glaucoma.

Authors:  C M Tochel; J S Morton; J L Jay; J D Morrison
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Vitamin A and fish oils for preventing the progression of retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Stephen G Schwartz; Xue Wang; Pamela Chavis; Ajay E Kuriyan; Samuel A Abariga
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-18

7.  Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter.

Authors:  Stylianos Tsapakis; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Andreas Diagourtas; Stylianos Kandarakis; Konstantinos Droutsas; Konstantinos Andreanos; Dimitrios Brouzas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.