| Literature DB >> 27121283 |
Rengna Yan1,2,3, Shanshan Lai1,4,5, Yang Yang1,5,6, Hongfei Shi1,5,7, Zhenming Cai1,5, Vincenzo Sorrentino8, Hong Du1,2, Huimei Chen1,5.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have identified Ankyrin-1 (ANK1) as a common type 2 diabetes (T2D) susceptibility locus. However, the underlying causal variants and functional mechanisms remain unknown. We screened for 8 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ANK1 between 2 case-control studies. Genotype analysis revealed significant associations of 3 SNPs, rs508419 (first identified here), rs515071, and rs516946 with T2D (P < 0.001). These SNPs were in linkage disequilibrium (r(2) > 0.80); subsequent analysis indicated that the CCC haplotype associated with increased T2D susceptibility (OR 1.447, P < 0.001). Further mapping showed that rs508419 resides in the muscle-specific ANK1 gene promoter. Allele-specific mRNA and protein level measurements confirmed association of the C allele with increased small ANK1 (sAnk1) expression in human skeletal muscle (P = 0.018 and P < 0.001, respectively). Luciferase assays showed increased rs508419-C allele transcriptional activity in murine skeletal muscle C2C12 myoblasts, and electrophoretic mobility-shift assays demonstrated altered rs508419 DNA-protein complex formation. Glucose uptake was decreased with excess sAnk1 expression upon insulin stimulation. Thus, the ANK1 rs508419-C T2D-risk allele alters DNA-protein complex binding leading to increased promoter activity and sAnk1 expression; thus, increased sAnk1 expression in skeletal muscle might contribute to T2D susceptibility.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27121283 PMCID: PMC4848520 DOI: 10.1038/srep25105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics and demographics of the patients and controls enrolled in Stage 1 and Stage 2.
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | P | Cases | Controls | P | |
| Number | 441 | 441 | 733 | 733 | ||
| Male, n (%) | 225 (51.0%) | 238 (54%) | NS | 441 (60.2%) | 454 (61.9%) | NS |
| Age, yr | 59.3 ± 11.1 | 59.3 ± 11.2 | NS | 57.1 ± 13.1 | 56.9 ± 13.1 | NS |
| Smoking, n (%) | 74 (16.9%) | – | – | 138 (19.1%) | – | – |
| Diabetes duration, yr | 8.32 ± 6.91 | – | – | 7.74 ± 6.82 | – | – |
| HbA1c, % | 9.05 ± 2.51 | – | – | 9.13 ± 2.54 | – | – |
| FPG, mM | 7.86 ± 3.22 | 5.05 ± 0.47 | <0.001 | 7.91 ± 3.18 | 5.06 ± 0.50 | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.7 ± 3.75 | 23.6 ± 3.37 | <0.001 | 24.9 ± 3.93 | 23.7 ± 3.24 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mM | 1.87 ± 2.01 | 1.49 ± 0.96 | 0.002 | 2.04 ± 2.38 | 1.58 ± 1.02 | <0.001 |
| HDL cholesterol, mM | 1.07 ± 0.30 | 1.41 ± 0.35 | <0.001 | 1.10 ± 0.31 | 1.38 ± 0.34 | <0.001 |
| LDL cholesterol, mM | 2.90 ± 1.58 | 2.81 ± 0.68 | NS | 2.94 ± 1.37 | 2.83 ± 0.67 | NS |
| Systolic BP, mm Hg | 143 ± 22.4 | 124 ± 16.6 | <0.001 | 141 ± 22.9 | 126 ± 17.7 | <0.001 |
| Diastolic BP, mm Hg | 80.6 ± 11.3 | 75 ± 10.5 | <0.001 | 80.9 ± 11.7 | 76 ± 11.1 | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as the number (%) or average ± SD. Abbreviations used: HbA1c, haemoglobinA1c; FPG, Fasting Plasma Glucose; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; NS, no significant difference compared between cases and controls.
Stage 1 analysis showed the association of SNPs in (s)ANK1 for T2D development and the levels of HbA1c, Hb and fasting glucose.
| Gene | Effect/other | T2D Development | HbA1c(%) | HbA1c (%) adjusted for glucose, sex, age | Hb (g/L) | Hb (g/L) adjusted for sex, age | Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | Fasting glucose (mmol/L) adjusted for sex, age | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs4466386 | T/C | 0.969 (0.789–1.191) | −0.045 (0.012) | −0.036 (0.014) | −0.10 (0.001) | −0.01 (0.002) | −0.008 (0.01) | 0.002 (0.01) | |
| 0.768 | 0.365 | 0.52 | 0.838 | 0.849 | 0.875 | 0.963 | |||
| rs10090395 | C/T | 1.002 (0.773–1.300) | 0.054 (0.01) | 0.042 (0.011) | 0.038 (0.001) | 0.031 (0.001) | 0.027 (0.008) | 0.015 (0.008) | |
| 0.983 | 0.276 | 0.454 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.583 | 0.762 | |||
| rs4737009 | A/G | 1.034 (0.854–1.253) | −0.035 (0.013) | −0.056 (0.015) | 0.051 (0.002) | 0.041 (0.002) | 0.018 (0.01) | 0.007 (0.01) | |
| 0.732 | 0.476 | 0.315 | 0.288 | 0.438 | 0.716 | 0.893 | |||
| rs6474359 | C/T | 1.010 (0.654–1.559) | −0.036 (0.007) | 0.001 (0.007) | −0.61 (0.001) | −0.101 (0.001) | −0.031 (0.005) | −0.024 (0.005) | |
| 0.963 | 0.464 | 0.987 | 0.213 | 0.054 | 0.528 | 0.623 | |||
| rs508419 | C/T | 1.663 (1.247–2.218) | 0.102 (0.009) | 0.119 (0.01) | 0.023 (0.001) | −0.021 (0.001) | −0.006 (0.007) | −0.018 (0.007) | |
| 4.83 × 10−4 | 0.040 | 0.034 | 0.634 | 0.691 | 0.902 | 0.709 | |||
| rs515071 | C/T | 1.583 (1.228–2.039) | 0.104 (0.01) | 0.115 (0.011) | 0.049 (0.001) | 0.026 (0.001) | −0.012 (0.007) | −0.026 (0.007) | |
| 3.63 × 10−4 | 0.034 | 0.040 | 0.312 | 0.627 | 0.801 | 0.593 | |||
| rs516946 | C/T | 1.750 (1.308–2.341) | 0.106 (0.008) | 0.121 (0.009) | 0.032 (0.001) | −0.010 (0.001) | −0.004 (0.007) | −0.018 (0.007) | |
| 1.41 × 10−4 | 0.032 | 0.029 | 0.513 | 0.856 | 0.939 | 0.718 | |||
| rs4737000 | C/A | 0.972 (0.790–1.195) | 0.072 (0.014) | 0.085 (0.015) | −0.027 (0.002) | −0.041 (0.002) | −0.029 (0.01) | −0.039 (0.011) | |
| 0.788 | 0.148 | 0.127 | 0.575 | 0.436 | 0.549 | 0.427 |
aData were showed as OR (95% CI) (upper) and p value (lower).
bData were showed as β (SE) (upper) and p value (lower).
Stage 2 analysis showed the association of SNPs in (s)ANK1 for T2D development and the levels of HbA1c, Hb and fasting glucose.
| T2D Development | HbA1c (%) adjusted for glucose, sex, age | Hb (g/L) adjusted for sex, age | Fasting glucose (mmol/L) adjusted for sex, age | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP (Effect/other) | ||||
| rs508419 (C/T) | 1.531 (1.215–1.930)2.85 × 10−4 | 0.069 (0.008)0.115 | 0.005 (0.001)0.898 | −0.015 (0.005)0.696 |
| rs515071 (C/T) | 1.468 (1.199–1.798)1.86 × 10−4 | 0.049 (0.008)0.261 | 0.047 (0.001)0.263 | 0.008 (0.006)0.828 |
| rs516946 (C/T) | 1.495 (1.187–1.882)5.88 × 10−4 | 0.071 (0.007)0.106 | 0.000 (0.001)0.996 | −0.005 (0.005)0.893 |
| CCC | 1.477 (1.203–1.814)1.87 × 10−4 | 1.292 (0.930 ~ 1.794)0.125 | 0.711 (0.491 ~ 1.029)0.069 | 0.817 (0.578–1.154)0.251 |
| rs4737009 (A/G) | − | −0.031 (0.012)0.488 | 0.025 (0.001)0.473 | 0.026 (0.008)0.495 |
| rs6474359 (C/T) | − | −0.001 (0.005)0.978 | −0.059 (0.001)0.161 | − 0.027 (0.004)0.481 |
aData were showed as OR (95% CI) (upper) and p value (lower).
bData were showed as β (SE) (upper) and p value (lower) after adjusted.
Figure 1Structure of the ANK1 risk locus and locations of the investigated SNPs.
(A) Distribution of 8 candidate SNPs within the different transcripts of ANK1. The UCSC Genome Browser diagram shows that the ANK1 gene is transcribed from right to left, with P1 and P2 promoter-specific transcripts. The green peaks are related to the open chromatin in HSMM cells. Haplotype analysis results from the HapMap CHB genotype data are shown in a colour-coded scale, expressing the logarithm of odds (LOD) value for the LD (red: LOD score ≥ 2 and D′ = 1; pink: LOD score ≥ 2 and D′ < 1; blue: LOD score < 2 and D′ = 1; white: LOD score < 2 and D′ < 1). (B) T2D risk SNPs located in the sAnk1 transcript (magnified views from the boxed area in Fig. 1A). The results from the 2-stage case-control studies confirmed that rs508419 was localized to the ANK1 P1 promoter and that 2 additional variants (rs516946 and rs515071) were associated with T2D. (C) LD mapping of the 3 associated SNPs (P < 0.01; left) examined in this study and the HapMap Phase II CHB genotype data (P < 0.01; right). The LD structures of all SNPs (including the 3 risk SNPs) were analysed using Haploview 4.2.
Figure 2Dissection of the effect of SNP rs508419 on the transcriptional activity and expression of sAnk1.
(A,B) Expression of sAnk1 mRNA (A) and protein (B) increased in human skeletal muscle tissues with the rs508419 C allele, compared to that observed in samples carrying the T allele. The results shown represent the mean ± S.D. Differences among the CC, CT, and TT groups were compared using one-way ANOVA testing, followed by an LSD test. Twenty-six muscle samples were analyzed including 17, 5, or 4 samples from subjects with the CC, CT, or TT genotype, respectively (Supplementary Table S3). Protein samples were available from 7 subjects with the CC genotype. (C) The ANK1 gene P1 promoter corresponding to positions −641 to +82 or −237 to +82 relative to the transcription initiation site (+1) with allele C or T at site c. − 199 (rs508419) were cloned in the pGL3 plasmid, resulting in the construction of 4 plasmids: Promoter1-pGL3-C/T and Promoter2-pGL3-C/T. (D) The activity of the ANK1 P1 and P2 plasmid types and the empty pGL3-Basic vector were studied in C2C12 cell transfectants. The results shown represent the mean ± S.D. of at least 3 independent transfection experiments. P values were calculated by Student’s t-test.
Figure 3The T2D C risk allele of rs508419 alters transcription factor binding.
(A) The genomic rs508419 SNP site is localised to a transcription factor-binding region, as determined by analysing ChIP-seq data from the ENCODE project. The arrow indicates the direction of sAnk1 transcription. (B) EMSA analysis with C2C12 cell extracts and oligonucleotide probes containing the C and T alleles of the ANK1 P1 promoter. PC, positive control. (C) The different binding affinities of transcription factors observed with 2 EMSA oligonucleotide probes obtained from the JASPAR database. A high score is predicted to be associated with strong binding of proteins to specific DNA sequences.
Figure 4Overexpression of sAnk1 decreased glucose uptake in C2C12 cells.
(A) The efficiency of pEGFP-c1-sAnk1 transferred in C2C12 cells. C2C12 cells were transfected with the pEGFP-c1-sAnk1 plasmid. After differentiation, total RNA and protein isolates were analyzed by qPCR and western blotting, respectively. (B) Glucose uptake in C2C12 cells after transfection with the pEGFP-c1-sAnk1 plasmid and subsequent differentiation. The data shown are the mean ± S.D. P values were calculated by Student’s t-test.