Literature DB >> 27121254

Childhood body mass index and height and risk of histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer.

J Aarestrup1, M Gamborg1, L G Ulrich2, T I A Sørensen1,3, J L Baker1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer risk factors include adult obesity and taller stature, but the influence of size earlier in life is incompletely understood. We examined whether childhood body mass index (BMI; kg m(-2)) and height were associated with histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer.
METHODS: From the Copenhagen School Health Records Register, 155 505 girls born 1930-1989 with measured weights and heights from 7 to 13 years were linked to health registers. BMI and height were transformed to age-specific z-scores. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by Cox regressions.
RESULTS: A total of 1020 endometrial cancers were recorded. BMI was non-linearly associated with all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers and the subtype of endometrioid adenocarcinomas; associations were statistically significant and positive above a z-score=0 and non-significant below zero. Compared with a 7-year-old girl with a BMI z-score=0, an equally tall girl who was 3.6 kg heavier (BMI z-score=1.5) had a hazard ratio=1.53 (95% confidence interval: 1.29-1.82) for endometrioid adenocarcinoma. BMI was not associated with non-oestrogen-dependent cancers, except at the oldest childhood ages. Height at all ages was statistically significant and positively associated with all endometrial cancers, except non-oestrogen-dependent cancers. At 7 years, per ~5.2 cm (1 z-score), the risk of endometrioid adenocarcinoma was 1.18 (95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.28). Among non-users of unopposed oestrogens, associations between BMI and endometrioid adenocarcinoma strengthened, but no effects on height associations were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial carcinogenesis is linked to early-life body size, suggesting that childhood BMI and height may be useful indicators for the risk of later development of endometrial cancer and might aid in the early prevention of obesity-related endometrial cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27121254      PMCID: PMC4973214          DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2016.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


Introduction

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecologic cancer among women in the Western world.[1, 2, 3] Excess body fatness in adulthood is consistently and strongly linked to an increased risk of endometrial cancer among both pre- and post-menopausal women.[1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7] It is estimated that 34% of the global burden of incident endometrial cancer is attributable to excess adult adiposity.[8] Aetiologically, endometrial cancer is a heterogeneous cancer.[9] Oestrogen-dependent cancers (type 1) account for ~80% of endometrial cancers, of which endometrioid adenocarcinoma is the predominant form and the prototype. Non-oestrogen-dependent cancers (type 2) are less common and account for ~20% of endometrial cancers.[10, 11, 12] Adiposity is thought to increase the risk of oestrogen-dependent endometrial cancers through an augmented bioavailability of endogenous oestrogens produced by aromatisation of androgens in adipose tissue.[13] Although less attention has been given to adult stature, evidence suggests that height may increase the risk of endometrial cancer, but specific mechanisms are unknown.[1, 4, 14] It is possible that the initiation of endometrial cancer begins early in life; however, associations between early-life body size and subsequent risk of endometrial cancer are inconsistent. Although several studies found indications of positive associations with child and adolescent body size, all used self-reported recalled body size and histological subtypes of endometrial cancer were not examined.[15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24] A few studies examined associations with child height,[19, 21, 23] but only one found a significant and positive association.[23] Therefore, we investigated whether childhood body mass index (BMI; kg m−2) and height were associated with the risk of histological subtypes of endometrial cancer in a population-based cohort.

Subjects and methods

Cohort

The study population was from the Copenhagen School Health Records Register, which contains computerised information on 372 636 children. Virtually, all school children in the municipality of Copenhagen, born 1930–1989, underwent annual mandatory health examinations through 1983 and thereafter only at school entrance and exit, unless the child had specific health requirements. Heights and weights were measured by trained school physicians and nurses with high precision.[25] Unique government-issued personal identification numbers were assigned to all Danish residents alive in 1968 or born thereafter.[26] Children who attended school in 1968 or later had their identification number recorded on their health card. If a child left school before this time, the number was retrieved. Via these identification numbers, linkages were made to national health registers for follow-up.

Study variables

Using the Lamda, Median, Sigma method, BMI and height were transformed into z-scores.[27] BMI z-scores were based upon an internal age- and sex-specific reference chosen from a period with a low and stable obesity prevalence. Height z-scores were based upon internal sex-, age- and birth cohort-specific references to account for secular increases in height. Z-scores were interpolated or extrapolated within a ±12-month period.[28] Incident endometrial cancers were identified through linkage to the Danish Cancer Registry, which contains information on cancers from 1943 onwards.[29] The majority of the cancers are morphologically verified, and due to compulsory notification, the completeness of the registry is high.[29, 30] The International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes version 7 was used until 1994 and version 10 thereafter. Danish Cancer Registry personnel recoded all cancers diagnosed between 1978 and 2004 to ICD-10 and ICD for Oncology codes (ICD-O) version 3.[29] Endometrial cancers were classified using ICD-10 codes C54.0–C54.1, C54.3–C54.6, C54.9 and C55.9. On the basis of ICD-O-3 morphology codes, sarcomas, carcinomasarcomas, very rare endometrial cancers and cancers without information on morphology were excluded from all analyses. The remaining cancers were classified as oestrogen dependent or non-oestrogen dependent, except for a few cancers that could not be classified due to limited morphology information (Table 1).
Table 1

Specification of endometrial cancers

TypeMorphology (ICD-O-3)SpecificationN
Oestrogen-dependenta8140Adenocarcinoma, NOSb176
 8210Adenocarcinoma in tubular adenoma4
 8380Endometrioid adenocarcinoma, NOS659
 8480Mucinous adenocarcinoma14
 8560Adenosquamous carcinoma27
 8570Adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation40
Subtotal  920
 
Non-oestrogen-dependenta8051Verrucous carcinoma, NOS1
 8070Squamous cell carcinoma, NOS4
 8260Papillary adenocarcinoma, NOS9
 8310Clear cell adenocarcinoma, NOS18
 8441Serous cystadenocarcinoma, NOS58
 8460Papillary serous cystadenocarcinoma2
Subtotal  92
 
Unspecific8000Malignant neoplasm, NOS2
 8010Carcinoma, NOS4
 8020Carcinoma, undifferentiated, NOS2
Subtotal  8
Total  1020
 
Excluded endometrial cancers8230Solid carcinoma, NOS4
 8246Neuroendocrine carcinoma, NOS1
 8381Endometrioid adenofibroma5
 8800Sarcoma, NOS4
 8890Leiomyosarcoma, NOS23
 8896Myxoid leiomyosarcoma1
 8930Endometrial stromal sarcoma, NOS8
 8933Adenosarcoma3
 8934Carcinofibroma1
 8935Stromal sarcoma, NOS6
 8950Mullerian mixed tumour3
 8951Mesodermal mixed tumour1
 8980Carcinosarcoma, NOS30
 9080Teratoma, NOS1
 9990No morphology4
 9999No morphology5
Total  100

Abbreviation: ICD, International Classification of Disease.

Oestrogen-dependent are type 1 cancers, non-oestrogen-dependent cancers are type 2 cancers.

Adenocarcinomas NOS (not otherwise specified) were included as oestrogen-dependent cancers, as they are most likely endometrioid.

Vital status was obtained by linkage to the Vital Statistics Register.[26] Hysterectomy information was obtained by linkage to the Danish National Patient Register, which was established in 1977 and contains information on all hospital discharge diagnoses.[31] Information on hormone replacement therapy usage was obtained through linkage to the Danish National Prescription Registry, which contains the data on all prescriptions dispensed by Danish pharmacies from 1995 onwards.[32] Unopposed oestrogens were identified using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification codes (G03CA03 (oestradiol), G03CA04 (oestriol), G03CA53 (oestradiol, combinations), G03CA57 (conjugated oestrogens) and trade names). Women were classified as using unopposed oestrogens if prescriptions were refilled at least twice.

Study population

Women eligible for this study were born 1930–1989, with an identification number, alive and living in Denmark on 1 January 1978 and aged 18 years or older. Among 184 276 girls in the cohort, 21 717 did not have an identification number (as identification numbers could not be retrieved for all leaving school before 1968 due to, for example, death, emigration, name changes and possible spelling errors) and 3808 were excluded due to emigration, death or loss to follow-up before age 18 years or 1 January 1978. In addition, women with a hysterectomy before 1978 (N=525) or age 18 years (N=5), with an endometrial cancer diagnosis before 1978 (N=10), without a date for the endometrial cancer diagnosis (N=1), missing height and/or weight measurements at all childhood ages (N=2701) or with outlying height or BMI z-scores at all ages (z-score less than −4.5 or greater than 4.5; N=4) were excluded. Each woman was followed from the age of 18 years or from her age in 1978, whichever came later. Individuals were followed up until a diagnosis of endometrial cancer, hysterectomy, death, emigration, loss to follow-up or 31 December 2012, whichever came first.

Statistical analysis

Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to examine associations between BMI and height z-scores, with and without mutual adjustment, at each age from 7 to 13 years and the risk of all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers, endometrioid adenocarcinomas and non-oestrogen-dependent cancers, respectively. Age at diagnosis was the underlying time scale, and analyses were stratified by 5-year birth cohorts to allow the baseline hazard to differ by birth cohort. The linearity of the associations was assessed by linear splines with two knots at z-scores of ±0.68 corresponding to ~25th and 75th percentiles of the distributions. Statistically significant non-linearity was detected for associations between BMI and all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers and endometrioid adenocarcinomas, except at ages 12–13 years. Nonetheless, the overall pattern from the younger ages remained and the results are therefore presented using non-linear models. To facilitate interpretation, point estimates are presented for z-scores of ±0.5, ±1.0 and ±1.5 (corresponding to ~7th, 16th, 31st, 69th, 84th and 93rd percentiles) with a z-score of 0 as reference. Deviations from linearity were not detected in the associations between BMI and non-oestrogen-dependent cancers or between height and all endometrial cancers (except at ages 10–13 years), oestrogen-dependent cancers (except at ages 10–13 years), endometrioid adenocarcinomas and non-oestrogen-dependent cancers. Upon inspection, the significant deviations from linearity revealed only a tendency for a levelling-off in the increased risk among the tallest girls, therefore results are presented using the linear models. Proportional hazards assumptions were investigated by testing if associations between BMI and height, respectively, and endometrial cancer differed within categories of age at diagnosis using likelihood ratio tests. In addition, potential interactions of birth cohort with the associations between BMI and height, respectively, and endometrial cancers were investigated using likelihood ratio tests. Violations of the proportional hazards assumption and birth cohort effects were not detected. To examine the influence of unopposed oestrogen usage on associations between childhood body size and endometrioid adenocarcinoma, a sub-analysis was conducted following women from 1995 onwards. Women were followed until unopposed oestrogen usage, a diagnosis of endometrial cancer, hysterectomy, death, emigration, loss to follow-up or 31 December 2012, whichever came first. Population-attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated to estimate the burden of endometrial cancers attributable to childhood overweight (including obesity) in a contemporary population of girls from the United States. This study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. According to Danish law, ethical approval is not required for register-based studies.

Results

The study included 155 505 women. During 35 years and 4.1 million person-years of follow-up, 1020 women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Among these, 920 were oestrogen-dependent cancers (of which 659 were endometrioid adenocarcinoma), 92 were non-oestrogen-dependent cancers and 8 cancers were not classified as either type. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range: 24–82) for all endometrial cancers, 61 years (range: 24–82) for oestrogen-dependent cancers, 62 years (range: 24–82) for endometrioid adenocarcinomas and 66 years (range: 38–79) for non-oestrogen-dependent cancers. The median values of both childhood BMI and height increased with age in childhood (Supplementary Table 1). Childhood BMI was non-linearly associated with all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers and the subtype of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. At all childhood ages, girls with a BMI z-score above 0 had a higher risk of all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers and endometrioid adenocarcinoma compared with girls with a BMI z-score of 0 (Figure 1; Supplementary Table 2). Adjusting these associations for height only slightly attenuated the risk estimates (Supplementary Table 3). In contrast, BMI values below 0 were not associated with these cancers (Figure 1; Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Few women were diagnosed with non-oestrogen-dependent cancers, and even though positive and statistically significant associations with childhood BMI were found at ages 12 and 13 years, the confidence intervals were wide (Table 2).
Figure 1

Hazard ratios (solid lines) and 95% confidence intervals (dotted lines) for the non-linear association between childhood BMI at ages 7 and 13 years, respectively, and the risk of all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers and endometrioid adenocarcinomas (Cox model stratified by 5-year birth cohorts. BMI was modelled using linear splines with two knots at z-scores of ±0.68).

Table 2

Childhood BMI and the risk of non-oestrogen-dependent endometrial cancer per BMI z-scorea

Age (years)NCasesBMI
BMI adjusted for height
   Hazard ratios95% confidence intervalsHazard ratios95% confidence intervals
7145 406841.030.81–1.301.000.78–1.27
8147 098861.170.92–1.491.150.90–1.48
9142 094851.130.89–1.451.110.86–1.42
10138 587871.230.97–1.571.200.94–1.55
11137 678861.250.97–1.601.230.95–1.59
12136 614861.301.02–1.661.301.01–1.68
13134 707881.311.03–1.661.311.02–1.68

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

Cox model stratified by 5-year birth cohorts.

Childhood height was significantly positively associated with all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers and endometrioid adenocarcinoma (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 4). Adjusting for childhood BMI slightly attenuated the associations, but they remained statistically significant (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 4). Childhood height was non-significantly, but positively associated with non-oestrogen-dependent endometrial cancers (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 4).
Figure 2

Childhood height and the risk of all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers, endometrioid adenocarcinomas and non-oestrogen-dependent cancers per z-score unadjusted (black symbols) and adjusted (white symbols) for BMI (Cox model stratified by 5-year birth cohorts).

We investigated whether unopposed oestrogen usage modified the associations between childhood body size and endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Of the 140 044 women followed from 1995 onwards, 8278 used unopposed oestrogens. There were 534 endometrioid adenocarcinomas among non-users and 74 among users of unopposed oestrogens. In this subsample, results were similar to those in the full-sample analyses on childhood BMI and endometrioid adenocarcinomas (Table 3; Supplementary Table 5). Among non-users of unopposed oestrogens, the estimates in analyses unadjusted and adjusted for height seemed to strengthen, but the overall pattern of associations did not change (Table 3; Supplementary Table 5). Correspondingly, in this subsample, the childhood height associations were similar to those in the full sample (Supplementary Table 6). Among non-users of unopposed oestrogens, the estimates between childhood height and endometrioid adenocarcinoma were not affected (Supplementary Table 6).
Table 3

Childhood BMI and the risk of endometrioid adenocarcinoma, following women from 1995 when HRT information was availablea

Censoring for unopposed oestrogen useAge (years)NCasesBMI z-score (approximate percentile)bP-valuec
    −1.5 (7th)
−1.0 (16th)
−0.5 (31st)
0 (50th)0.5 (69th)
1.0 (84th)
1.5 (93rd)
 
    HR95% CIHR95% CIHR95% CIHRHR95% CIHR95% CIHR95% CI 
No censoring7131 1205720.960.78–1.180.920.82–1.040.930.84–1.021.00 (ref.)1.080.98–1.201.261.11–1.411.521.27–1.810.05
 8132 4935830.970.77–1.220.930.82–1.060.930.84–1.031.00 (ref.)1.070.97–1.191.271.13–1.431.601.34–1.900.02
 9127 4825830.930.73–1.190.930.81–1.050.940.85–1.041.00 (ref.)1.060.96–1.181.271.13–1.431.641.37–1.950.02
 10123 9405780.970.77–1.240.900.79–1.020.890.80–0.981.00 (ref.)1.131.02–1.251.351.20–1.521.671.39–2.010.02
 11123 0075800.950.75–1.220.900.79–1.030.910.82–1.001.00 (ref.)1.101.00–1.221.331.18–1.501.701.41–2.040.02
 12121 9505780.880.68–1.130.860.75–0.980.880.80–0.981.00 (ref.)1.131.02–1.251.341.18–1.511.621.34–1.960.14
 13120 1335660.850.66–1.100.830.73–0.950.860.78–0.961.00 (ref.)1.161.04–1.281.341.18–1.511.551.29–1.880.27
Censored7131 1205010.960.76–1.200.910.80–1.040.910.82–1.011.00 (ref.)1.100.99–1.231.311.16–1.491.641.37–1.970.02
 8132 4935120.910.71–1.180.900.79–1.030.920.83–1.021.00 (ref.)1.090.98–1.211.311.15–1.481.661.39–1.990.04
 9127 4825120.880.67–1.150.900.78–1.040.940.84–1.051.00 (ref.)1.070.96–1.191.301.14–1.471.701.42–2.050.03
 10123 9405080.970.75–1.250.890.77–1.020.880.79–0.981.00 (ref.)1.141.02–1.271.391.22–1.581.771.46–2.140.01
 11123 0075100.900.69–1.190.880.76–1.010.890.80–1.001.00 (ref.)1.121.00–1.251.371.21–1.561.781.47–2.150.04
 12121 9505100.840.63–1.110.840.73–0.970.880.79–0.981.00 (ref.)1.141.02–1.271.381.21–1.561.721.41–2.090.16
 13120 1334980.820.62–1.090.810.70–0.930.850.76–0.951.00 (ref.)1.181.05–1.311.381.21–1.581.631.34–1.980.31

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; HRT, hormone replacement therapy.

Cox model stratified by 5-year birth cohorts. BMI was modelled using linear splines with two knots at z-scores of ±0.68.

The exact percentile equivalents to the z-scores change with age, so approximate percentiles are shown.

Test for linearity using a likelihood ratio test.

Discussion

In this large prospective cohort study, we found that girls with a BMI value above average at each age from 7 to 13 years experienced a significantly higher risk of all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers and the oestrogen-dependent subtype of endometrioid adenocarcinoma compared with girls of average size, whereas associations were not found among girls with BMI values below average. In contrast, associations between childhood BMI and non-oestrogen-dependent cancers were not identified except at ages 12–13 years and confidence intervals were broad. Childhood height was significantly and positively associated with all endometrial cancers, oestrogen-dependent cancers and endometrioid adenocarcinoma, but not with non-oestrogen-dependent cancers. Among non-users of unopposed oestrogens, associations between BMI and endometrioid adenocarcinoma seemed to strengthen, but there was little effect on the height associations. Findings from other studies on early-life body size have been inconsistent. In all studies investigating body size early in life in relation to later risk of endometrial cancer, body size was retrospectively recalled; this may partly explain the equivocal findings for both body size[15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24] and height.[19, 21, 23] Furthermore, none of the studies evaluated if the associations differed by histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer and they primarily focused on body size in late adolescence making direct comparisons difficult. We found that childhood BMI was non-linearly associated with the risk of endometrial cancer. Although studies on childhood body size have not found similar non-linear effects, several studies on adult BMI have found that associations were stronger or limited to women with a BMI >27–30 kg m−2,[1, 4, 6, 33, 34] whereas evidence suggests that associations with adult height are linear. Thus, these findings together with ours suggest that adiposity may be especially associated with endometrial cancer risk among females with a high level of adiposity. In the adult literature, the vast majority of studies do not classify endometrial cancer by oestrogen dependency. Among studies distinguishing between oestrogen-dependent (type 1) and non-oestrogen-dependent (type 2) endometrial cancers, various definitions used are likely to contribute to some inconsistencies. Excess adult adiposity was positively associated with both types of endometrial cancers in some studies, nevertheless being most pronounced for oestrogen-dependent cancers.[7, 10, 35, 36] Similarly, adult height has also been associated with both types of endometrial cancers, but again stronger associations were observed with oestrogen-dependent cancers.[35] We did not observe any associations between childhood body size and non-oestrogen-dependent cancers. Non-oestrogen-dependent cancers are relatively uncommon, and in some studies grade 3 endometrioid cancers, which are oestrogen dependent, are also included in this classification. This may have created spurious findings in the adult studies. Unopposed oestrogen use increases the risk of endometrial cancer.[13, 37] In sub-analyses including only non-users of unopposed oestrogens, the shape of the associations between childhood BMI and endometrioid adenocarcinoma remained similar but the effect size seemed to increase as compared with the analyses that did not account for unopposed oestrogen usage. These results are consistent with the finding that the burden of endometrial cancer attributable to excess adult adiposity is significantly higher among non-oestrogen users compared with ever users.[8] It is thought that exogenous oestrogens elevate circulating levels to such an extent that endogenous oestrogens produced by adipose tissue only have a limited additional influence on the risk of endometrial cancer.[1, 34] Associations between height and endometrioid adenocarcinoma did not change in analyses including only non-users of unopposed oestrogens as expected. Results from studies on childhood body size and endometrial cancer risk that adjusted for hormone replacement therapy use are inconsistent, and as they did not specifically investigate unopposed oestrogens, direct comparisons with our study are limited.[16, 17, 21, 22] The unopposed oestrogen hypothesis is the prevailing theory explaining associations between adiposity and endometrial cancer risk. Adiposity may favour endometrial carcinogenesis through a greater expression of aromatase increasing the production of oestrogens with mitogenic effects.[13, 38] It is proposed that this biological mechanism is particularly relevant among post-menopausal women, where ovarian production of oestrogens and progesterones has ceased.[13, 38] Among premenopausal women, the obesity-related increase in ovarian androgen production inducing a chronic anovulation leading to progesterone deficiency might be most important for endometrial carcinogenesis.[13, 38] In our study, we do not suspect that the associations with childhood body size differ by menopausal state, as the associations were the same across adult ages. The underlying mechanisms for an association between childhood height and endometrial cancer risk are unknown; however, height is a biological marker of various genetic, environmental, hormonal and nutritional factors associated with linear growth in childhood.[1] Nevertheless, independent of the unknown mechanisms for these associations, our findings emphasise that endometrial carcinogenesis may have its origins early in life. In our study, we examined only the associations of child size with endometrial cancer risk as information on adult size was unavailable. It is likely that our findings reflect an admixture of effects of childhood body size itself and the effects of size that tracks into adult life.[39] We found that the strength of the BMI and height associations were relatively constant across childhood ages with the exception of non-oestrogen-dependent endometrial cancers (although the confidence intervals were broad). As size at 13 years of age is more proximal in time to adult size than earlier size, it is expected that the associations at age 13 years would be stronger than at 7 years if tracking entirely explained these results. One study using recalled body size (somatotype drawings) at age 10 years with self-reported information on hysterectomy and HRT use found that associations with post-menopausal endometrial cancer largely disappeared after adjusting for adult BMI.[24] Even though we cannot disentangle the potential effects of tracking, our findings are important for identifying girls who may be at later risk of developing endometrial cancer. The major strengths of this study include the mandatory health exams with measurements of heights and weights among a large group of school children. In addition, we had almost complete long-term follow-up and due to the comprehensive Danish registers we had extensive pathology information on a large number of endometrial cancers making us able to classify cancers based on their oestrogen dependency. Our study might, however, be limited by not having information available on the age at menarche and menopause, as a woman's life-long number of ovulatory cycles affects her risk of developing endometrial cancer through the duration of exposure to endogenous sex hormones.[40] We examined associations based upon single body size measures; it was beyond the scope of this study to incorporate multiple measures and investigate growth in relation to endometrial cancer. To put our results into perspective, we calculated PAFs, which estimate the burden of endometrial cancers attributable to childhood adiposity. In our population of girls with far lower levels of overweight and obesity than contemporary girls, the PAF of overweight (including obesity) of endometrioid adenocarcinomas was 4.0% at the age of 7 years and 3.7 % at the age of 13 years. When extrapolating our findings using levels of overweight and obesity among girls in the latest US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2011–2012 (35% and 34% overweight or obese at ages 6–11 years and 12–19 years, respectively), the PAF of overweight (including obesity) of endometrioid adenocarcinomas was 22.3% at age 7 years and 19.8% at age 13 years.[41] These values resemble the PAF estimated for adult overweight and obesity of 34%.[8] Assuming a causal relationship, these estimates suggest there will be a tremendous increase in numbers of future endometrial cancers given the current high levels of childhood overweight and obesity, nonetheless, the estimates should be interpreted cautiously. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that a greater childhood body size is significantly and positively associated with the future risk of being diagnosed with endometrial cancer, particularly the oestrogen-dependent types. However, potential mechanisms for these associations with childhood body size warrant further investigation. Even though most oestrogen-dependent endometrial cancers have a good prognosis, women diagnosed with this disease suffer from impaired physical and psychological health, thus supporting efforts for the early identification of individuals at later risk of endometrial cancers to reduce the occurrence of this disease.
  37 in total

1.  Body mass index, hormone replacement therapy, and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma J Crosbie; Marcel Zwahlen; Henry C Kitchener; Matthias Egger; Andrew G Renehan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Cohort profile: the Copenhagen School Health Records Register.

Authors:  Jennifer L Baker; Lina W Olsen; Ingelise Andersen; Seija Pearson; Bente Hansen; Thorkild Ia Sørensen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Body mass index, weight gain, and risk of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  S H Olson; M Trevisan; J R Marshall; S Graham; M Zielezny; J E Vena; R Hellmann; J L Freudenheim
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.900

4.  Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Joel L Weissfeld; Roslyn A Stone; Robert Bowser; Mamatha Chivukula; Robert P Edwards; Faina Linkov
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  The Danish Cancer Registry--history, content, quality and use.

Authors:  H H Storm; E V Michelsen; I H Clemmensen; J Pihl
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1997-11

6.  Body mass index and height from childhood to adulthood in the 1958 British born cohort.

Authors:  C Power; J K Lake; T J Cole
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  The Danish Civil Registration System.

Authors:  Carsten Bøcker Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Postmenopausal endometrial cancer risk and body size in early life and middle age: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  T Y O Yang; B J Cairns; N Allen; S Sweetland; G K Reeves; V Beral
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The epidemiology of endometrial cancer in young women.

Authors:  B E Henderson; J T Casagrande; M C Pike; T Mack; I Rosario; A Duke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5·24 million UK adults.

Authors:  Krishnan Bhaskaran; Ian Douglas; Harriet Forbes; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva; David A Leon; Liam Smeeth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Early Life Exposures and Adult Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Corinne E Joshu
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Parental Perceptions and Behaviors Regarding Child Weight Status among Toddlers Born Preterm.

Authors:  Jessica Londeree Saleska; Kelly Sheppard; Abigail Norris Turner; Kelly M Boone; Sarah A Keim
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.079

3.  Associations between childhood body size and seventeen adverse outcomes: analysis of 65,057 European women.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Mikael Eriksson; Wei He; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Prevention Strategies in Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michelle L MacKintosh; Emma J Crosbie
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Childhood obesity leads to adult type 2 diabetes and coronary artery diseases: A 2-sample mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Xuqian Fang; Junli Zuo; Jingqi Zhou; Jialin Cai; Changqiang Chen; Enfei Xiang; Haibo Li; Xiaoyan Cheng; Peizhan Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Is the Perceived Fruit Accessibility Related to Fruit Intakes and Prevalence of Overweight in Disadvantaged Youth: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Narae Yang; Kirang Kim
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Body Mass Index (BMI): A Screening Tool Analysis.

Authors:  Deepesh Khanna; Cadynce Peltzer; Payal Kahar; Mayur S Parmar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  Birth weight and the risk of histological subtypes of ovarian and endometrial cancers: Results from the Copenhagen School Health Records Register.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Julie Aarestrup; Lian G Ulrich; Nicolas Wentzensen; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Jennifer L Baker
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Childhood body mass index growth trajectories and endometrial cancer risk.

Authors:  Julie Aarestrup; Michael Gamborg; Kate Tilling; Lian G Ulrich; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Jennifer L Baker
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 7.396

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.