Literature DB >> 27121037

Impact of timing and cycles of systemic chemotherapy on survival outcome of colorectal liver metastases patients treated by percutaneous microwave ablation.

Kai Zhang1, Jie Yu1, Fubo Zhou1, Xiaoling Yu1, Xin Li1, Jianbin Wang1, Zhiyu Han1, Zhigang Cheng1, Ping Liang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the optimal timing and number of cycles of systemic chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) treated by ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total 199 patients with 318 CLM, median number of tumours one per patient and median maximum size of tumours 3.0 cm, treated by PMWA combined with or without systemic chemotherapy were included in our study. Chemotherapy was administered pre-ablatively in 148 of those patients (74.4%), and post-ablatively in 142 (73.6%). Chemotherapy regimens included FOLFOX/XELOX, FOLFIRI/XELIRI, and sequential monotherapy. Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses, using log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.
RESULTS: The estimated 5-year rates of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.1% and 27.9%, respectively. The number of CLM (P = 0.003), maximum size of CLM (P < 0.001) and topography (P = 0.030) were independent prognostic factors for PFS of patients with CLM while age (P = 0.002), maximum size of CLM (P = 0.006) and post-ablative chemotherapy (P = 0.046) for OS. In further analysis, CLM patients receiving more than six cycles of post-ablative chemotherapy had significantly better OS (P = 0.015) than those without post-ablative chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: This study revealed chemotherapy administered after (more than six cycles) PMWA improved the OS of CLM patents. And, PMWA was a safe procedure in view of the absence of procedure-related death and low rate of major complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal liver metastases; cycles; percutaneous microwave ablation; systemic chemotherapy; timing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27121037     DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2016.1156169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  3 in total

Review 1.  Microwave Ablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, Irreversible Electroporation, and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate Size (3-5 cm) Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanne Nieuwenhuizen; Madelon Dijkstra; Robbert S Puijk; Bart Geboers; Alette H Ruarus; Evelien A Schouten; Karin Nielsen; Jan J J de Vries; Anna M E Bruynzeel; Hester J Scheffer; M Petrousjka van den Tol; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Martijn R Meijerink
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.945

Review 2.  Evidence on percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation for liver metastases over the last decade.

Authors:  Koji Tomita; Yusuke Matsui; Mayu Uka; Noriyuki Umakoshi; Takahiro Kawabata; Kazuaki Munetomo; Shoma Nagata; Toshihiro Iguchi; Takao Hiraki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Versus Open Surgical Resection for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.

Authors:  Qinxian Zhao; Zhigang Cheng; Zhiyu Han; Fangyi Liu; Xiaoling Yu; Xianliang Tan; Bin Han; Jianping Dou; Jie Yu; Ping Liang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.