Literature DB >> 27120104

Highlights in migraine electrophysiology: are controversies just reflecting disease heterogeneity?

Delphine Magis1, Marco Lisicki, Gianluca Coppola.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In migraine, the brain is 'hyperresponsive', which refers to a deficit of habituation to repeated sensory stimuli between attacks. This deficit normalizes in peri-ictal and ictal phases. A decreased cortical preactivation of thalamo-cortical origin and an impaired intracortical inhibition are probably involved in its pathophysiology. RECENT
FINDINGS: The reality of a habituation deficit of visual evoked potentials, a neurophysiological 'hallmark' of interictal migraine, has been questioned. Blinding may be an issue, but some genetic, environmental, or behavioural differences could also exist between populations. A habituation deficit is found interictally in other sensory modalities, and strongly depends on the time of the recordings within the migraine cycle. An impaired thalamocortical drive is demonstrated in interictal phase, and normalizes in ictal phase as well as in chronic migraine, where a strength enhancement of primary cortical activation is observed. An interictal dysexcitability, of subcortical or primary cortical origin, is suggested by magnetic stimulation. These phenomena could occur in varying degrees depending on patients and on the migraine cycle, and account for the heterogeneity of electrophysiological results.
SUMMARY: Finding a reliable electrophysiological biomarker for such a multifaceted and cycling disease as migraine is still a challenge. A better standardization of protocols would be worthwhile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27120104     DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol        ISSN: 1350-7540            Impact factor:   5.710


  8 in total

Review 1.  Visual Processing During the Interictal Period Between Migraines: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Timucin Sezai; Melanie J Murphy; Nina Riddell; Vinh Nguyen; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  Visual input drives increased occipital responsiveness and harmonized oscillations in multiple cortical areas in migraineurs.

Authors:  Jan Mehnert; Daniel Bader; Guido Nolte; Arne May
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 3.  A Review of Motion and Orientation Processing in Migraine.

Authors:  Alex J Shepherd
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 4.  From transformation to chronification of migraine: pathophysiological and clinical aspects.

Authors:  M Torres-Ferrús; F Ursitti; A Alpuente; F Brunello; D Chiappino; T de Vries; S Di Marco; S Ferlisi; L Guerritore; N Gonzalez-Garcia; A Gonzalez-Martinez; D Khutorov; M Kritsilis; A Kyrou; T Makeeva; A Minguez-Olaondo; L Pilati; A Serrien; O Tsurkalenko; D Van den Abbeele; W S van Hoogstraten; C Lampl
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  Current understanding of cortical structure and function in migraine.

Authors:  Else A Tolner; Shih-Pin Chen; Katharina Eikermann-Haerter
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 6.292

6.  Mechanical Punctate Pain Thresholds in Patients With Migraine Across Different Migraine Phases: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Li-Ling Hope Pan; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Evaluation of electrophysiological changes in migraine with visual aura.

Authors:  Mualla Sahin Hamurcu; Neslihan Bayraktar Bilen
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-22

8.  Brain Correlates of Single Trial Visual Evoked Potentials in Migraine: More Than Meets the Eye.

Authors:  Marco Lisicki; Kevin D'Ostilio; Gianluca Coppola; Alain Maertens de Noordhout; Vincenzo Parisi; Jean Schoenen; Delphine Magis
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.