| Literature DB >> 27119073 |
Chuck Chuan Ng1, Md Motior Rahman2, Amru Nasrulhaq Boyce1, Mhd Radzi Abas3.
Abstract
The growth response, metal tolerance and phytoaccumulation properties of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) were assessed under different contaminated spiked metals: control, 50 mg Pb/kg soil, 50 mg Zn/kg soil and 50 mg Cu/kg soil. The availability of Pb, Zn and Cu metals in both soil and plants were detected using flame atomic absorption spectrometry. The concentration and accumulation of heavy metals from soil to roots and shoots (edible parts) were evaluated in terms of translocation factor, accumulation factor and tolerance index. Okra recorded the highest accumulation of Pb (80.20 mg/kg) in its root followed by Zn in roots (35.70 mg/kg) and shoots (34.80 mg/kg) of water spinach, respectively. Different accumulation trends were observed with, Pb > Zn > Cu in okra and Zn > Pb > Cu in water spinach. Significant differences (p < 0.01) of Pb, Zn and Cu accumulation were found in both water spinach and okra cultivated among tested treatments. However, only the accumulation of Pb metal in the shoots of water spinach and okra exceeded the maximum permissible levels of the national Malaysian Food Act 1983 and Food Regulations 1985 (2006) as well as the international Codex Alimentarius Commission limits. This study has shown that both water spinach and okra have good potential as Pb and Zn phytoremediators.Entities:
Keywords: Contamination; Heavy metal accumulation; Okra; Water spinach
Year: 2016 PMID: 27119073 PMCID: PMC4833764 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2125-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Preliminary growth media soil parameters
| Characteristics (units) | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Soil texture | |
| Sand (%) | 24.5 |
| Silt (%) | 3.9 |
| Clay (%) | 71.6 |
| Soil pH | 5.06 ± 0.43 |
| Soil moisture content (%) | 19.41 ± 3.62 |
| Soil metal contents (mg/kg) | |
| Pb | 1.23 ± 0.19 |
| Zn | 0.41 ± 0.05 |
| Cu | 0.55 ± 0.01 |
SD standard deviation
Certified reference material (CRM) and metal recovery (%) for Pb, Zn and Cu metals
| Heavy metals | Initial soil (mg/kg) | Spiked metal (mg/kg) | CRM (mg/kg)a | Measured (mg/kg) | Metal recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 1.23 ± 0.19 | 50.24 ± 0.38 | 204.0 ± 6.0 | 219.44 ± 17.06 | 107.57 |
| Zn | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 50.83 ± 0.86 | 380.0 ± 13.0 | 356.06 ± 19.26 | 93.70 |
| Cu | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 49.62 ± 0.22 | 80.7 ± 3.5 | 76.73 ± 10.61 | 95.08 |
Mean ± standard deviation
aBAM Germany certified reference material BRM#12-mixed sandy soil
Fig. 1Changes in soil pH in water spinach and okra as influenced by different treatments. Vertical bars represent ± standard deviation in treatment means and same letters are not significantly different at 0.01 levels of probability
Fig. 2a Plant height, b number of leaves and c Dry matter yield of water spinach and okra as influenced by different types of treatments. Vertical bars represent ±standard deviation in treatment means and same letters are not significantly different at 0.01 levels of probability
Accumulation of Pb, Zn and Cu metals (dry weight of mg/kg) in water spinach and okra as influenced by different types of spiked heavy metal treatments
| Plant species | Treatment | Pb (mg/kg) | Zn (mg/kg) | Cu (mg/kg) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root | Shoot | Total | Root | Shoot | Total | Root | Shoot | Total | ||
| Water spinach | Control | 5.67 ± 4.6 b | 4.31 ± 4.1 b | 9.98 b | 1.71 ± 1.6 b | 1.42 ± 2.6 b | 3.13 b | 0.70 ± 1.2 d | 0.24 ± 0.4 d | 0.94 d |
| Pb | 27.69 ± 3.5 a | 30.31 ± 4.1 a | 58.00 a | 1.43 ± 0.7 bc | 1.26 ± 0.6 bc | 2.69 bc | 1.70 ± 0.3 c | 1.10 ± 0.5 c | 2.8 c | |
| Zn | 3.77 ± 1.7 c | 3.29 ± 2.3 c | 7.06 d | 35.70 ± 3.7 a | 35.10 ± 2.7 a | 70.8 a | 4.20 ± 2.0 b | 1.52 ± 0.3 b | 5.72 b | |
| Cu | 3.92 ± 0.7 c | 3.94 ± 1.7 bc | 7.86 c | 0.94 ± 0.7 bc | 1.34 ± 1.7 bc | 2.28 c | 34.80 ± 3.4 a | 18.87 ± 2.6 a | 53.6 a | |
| Okra | Control | 5.00 ± 1.2 d | 4.18 ± 2.9 c | 9.18 c | 1.10 ± 0.6 d | 1.89 ± 1.2 bc | 2.99 d | 1.03 ± 0.6 c | 0.25 ± 0.1 c | 1.28 d |
| Pb | 80.20 ± 4.7 a | 18.51 ± 5.2 a | 98.71 a | 1.31 ± 0.7 b | 1.98 ± 2.9 b | 3.29 b | 1.25 ± 0.7 b | 0.43 ± 0.2 b | 1.68 b | |
| Zn | 6.12 ± 3.5 b | 13.97 ± 2.1 b | 20.09 b | 9.32 ± 2.9 a | 5.18 ± 1.2 a | 14.5 a | 1.16 ± 0.6 bc | 0.23 ± 0.1 c | 1.39 c | |
| Cu | 5.25 ± 2.3 bc | 4.01 ± 2.9 d | 9.26 c | 1.23 ± 0.7 c | 1.95 ± 1.7 bc | 3.18 bc | 10.08 ± 2.4 a | 2.62 ± 0.7 a | 12.7 a | |
Mean ± standard deviation followed by the same letters is not significantly different for each treatment means at 0.01 levels of probability
Translocation factor (TF), accumulation factor (AF) and tolerance index (TI) of lead, zinc and copper metals in water spinach and okra as influenced by different treatments of control, Pb (50 mg Pb/kg soil), Zn (50 mg Zn/kg soil) and Cu (50 mg Cu/kg soil)
| Plant species | Treatment | Pb accumulation | Zn accumulation | Cu accumulation | TI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TF | AF | TF | AF | TF | AF | |||
| Water spinach | Control | 0.76 d | 4.61 a | 0.83 bc | 4.17 a | 0.34 c | 1.28 c | |
| Pb | 1.09 a | 0.55 d | 0.88 bc | 3.49 b | 0.65 a | 3.10 b | 0.764 a | |
| Zn | 0.87 c | 3.06 c | 0.98 b | 0.71 d | 0.36 c | 7.65 a | 0.591 ab | |
| Cu | 1.01 b | 3.18 b | 1.43 a | 2.29 c | 0.54 b | 0.70 d | 0.376 ab | |
| Okra | Control | 0.84 b | 4.06 b | 1.72 a | 2.68 c | 0.24 bc | 1.88 c | |
| Pb | 0.23 d | 1.61 d | 1.51 bc | 3.20 a | 0.35 a | 2.28 a | 0.860 a | |
| Zn | 2.28 a | 4.97 a | 0.56 d | 0.19 d | 0.20 d | 2.11 ab | 0.786 ab | |
| Cu | 0.76 c | 4.26 c | 1.59 b | 3.00 b | 0.26 b | 0.20 d | 0.555 ab | |
Mean ± standard deviation followed by the same letters is not significantly different for each treatment means at 0.01 levels of probability
Permissible levels of Pb, Zn and Cu metals in soil and food standards
| Heavy metals | Final soil (mg/kg) | Spiked heavy metal accumulation (mg/kg) | Soil limit (mg/kg)a | Food limit (mg/kg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water spinach | Okra | Water spinach | Okra | Msiab | FAO/WHOc | ||
| Pb | 0.622 | 1.163 | 30.31 | 18.51 | 10.4 | 2 | 5 |
| Zn | 0.187 | 0.151 | 35.10 | 5.18 | 21.9 | 40 | 60 |
| Cu | 0.408 | 0.094 | 18.87 | 2.62 | 13.8 | 30 | 40 |
aDepartment of Environment (DOE), Malaysia (2009)
bMalaysian Food Act 1983 and Food Regulations 1985 (2006)
cCodex Alimentarius Commission (1984)