Literature DB >> 27118906

Poromechanical behaviour of a surficial geological barrier during fluid injection into an underlying poroelastic storage formation.

A P S Selvadurai1, Jueun Kim1.   

Abstract

A competent low permeability and chemically inert geological barrier is an essential component of any strategy for the deep geological disposal of fluidized hazardous material and greenhouse gases. While the processes of injection are important to the assessment of the sequestration potential of the storage formation, the performance of the caprock is important to the containment potential, which can be compromised by the development of cracks and other defects that might be activated during and after injection. This paper presents a mathematical modelling approach that can be used to assess the state of stress in a surficial caprock during injection of a fluid to the interior of a poroelastic storage formation. Important information related to time-dependent evolution of the stress state and displacements of the surficial caprock with injection rates, and the stress state in the storage formation can be obtained from the theoretical developments. Most importantly, numerical results illustrate the influence of poromechanics on the development of adverse stress states in the geological barrier. The results obtained from the mathematical analysis illustrate that the surface heave increases as the hydraulic conductivity of the caprock decreases, whereas the surface heave decreases as the shear modulus of the caprock increases. The results also illustrate the influence of poromechanics on the development of adverse stress states in the caprock.

Keywords:  Biot poroelasticity; geological barriers; ground heave; mechanics of geological seals; time-dependent deformations

Year:  2016        PMID: 27118906      PMCID: PMC4841472          DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2015.0418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-5021            Impact factor:   2.704


  2 in total

1.  Poroelastic properties of rocks with a comparison of theoretical estimates and typical experimental results.

Authors:  A P S Selvadurai; A P Suvorov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  A computational continuum model of poroelastic beds.

Authors:  U Lācis; G A Zampogna; S Bagheri
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.704

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.