Edwin Wouters1, Asta Rau2, Michelle Engelbrecht2, Kerry Uebel2, Jacob Siegel3, Caroline Masquillier4, Gladys Kigozi2, Nina Sommerland4, Annalee Yassi3. 1. Department of Sociology and Research Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. 2. Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. 3. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 4. Department of Sociology and Research Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The dual burden of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is severely impacting the South African healthcare workforce. However, the use of on-site occupational health services is hampered by stigma among the healthcare workforce. The success of stigma-reduction interventions is difficult to evaluate because of a dearth of appropriate scientific tools to measure stigma in this specific professional setting. METHODS: The current pilot study aimed to develop and test a range of scales measuring different aspects of stigma-internal and external stigma toward tuberculosis as well as HIV-in a South African healthcare setting. The study employed data of a sample of 200 staff members of a large hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis produced 7 scales, displaying internal construct validity: (1) colleagues' external HIV stigma, (2) colleagues' actions against external HIV stigma, (3) respondent's external HIV stigma, (4) respondent's internal HIV stigma, (5) colleagues' external tuberculosis stigma, (6) respondent's external tuberculosis stigma, and (7) respondent's internal tuberculosis stigma. Subsequent analyses (reliability analysis, structural equation modeling) demonstrated that the scales displayed good psychometric properties in terms of reliability and external construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The study outcomes support the use of the developed scales as a valid and reliable means to measure levels of tuberculosis- and HIV-related stigma among the healthcare workforce in a resource-limited context. Future studies should build on these findings to fine-tune the instruments and apply them to larger study populations across a range of different resource-limited healthcare settings with high HIV and tuberculosis prevalence.
BACKGROUND: The dual burden of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is severely impacting the South African healthcare workforce. However, the use of on-site occupational health services is hampered by stigma among the healthcare workforce. The success of stigma-reduction interventions is difficult to evaluate because of a dearth of appropriate scientific tools to measure stigma in this specific professional setting. METHODS: The current pilot study aimed to develop and test a range of scales measuring different aspects of stigma-internal and external stigma toward tuberculosis as well as HIV-in a South African healthcare setting. The study employed data of a sample of 200 staff members of a large hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis produced 7 scales, displaying internal construct validity: (1) colleagues' external HIV stigma, (2) colleagues' actions against external HIV stigma, (3) respondent's external HIV stigma, (4) respondent's internal HIV stigma, (5) colleagues' external tuberculosis stigma, (6) respondent's external tuberculosis stigma, and (7) respondent's internal tuberculosis stigma. Subsequent analyses (reliability analysis, structural equation modeling) demonstrated that the scales displayed good psychometric properties in terms of reliability and external construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The study outcomes support the use of the developed scales as a valid and reliable means to measure levels of tuberculosis- and HIV-related stigma among the healthcare workforce in a resource-limited context. Future studies should build on these findings to fine-tune the instruments and apply them to larger study populations across a range of different resource-limited healthcare settings with high HIV and tuberculosis prevalence.
Authors: Alizanne C Collier; Stefaan F M Van der Borght; Tobias Rinke de Wit; Tobias F Rinke de Wit; Sarah C Richards; Frank G Feeley Journal: Int J Occup Environ Health Date: 2007 Jan-Mar
Authors: Priscilla S Dlamini; Thecla W Kohi; Leana R Uys; René Deliwe Phetlhu; Maureen L Chirwa; Joanne R Naidoo; William L Holzemer; Minrie Greeff; Lucy N Makoae Journal: Public Health Nurs Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.462
Authors: Minrie Greeff; Leana R Uys; William L Holzemer; Lucia N Makoae; Priscilla S Dlamini; Thecla W Kohi; Maureen L Chirwa; Joanne R Naidoo; Rene D Phetlhu Journal: Afr J Nurs Midwifery Date: 2008
Authors: Laura Nyblade; Aparna Jain; Manal Benkirane; Li Li; Anna-Leena Lohiniva; Roger McLean; Janet M Turan; Nelson Varas-Díaz; Francheska Cintrón-Bou; Jihui Guan; Zachary Kwena; Wendell Thomas Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Ruvandhi R Nathavitharana; Patricia Bond; Angela Dramowski; Koot Kotze; Philip Lederer; Ingrid Oxley; Jurgens A Peters; Chanel Rossouw; Helene-Mari van der Westhuizen; Bart Willems; Tiong Xun Ting; Arne von Delft; Dalene von Delft; Raquel Duarte; Edward Nardell; Alimuddin Zumla Journal: Presse Med Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 1.228
Authors: Jeremy C Kane; Melissa A Elafros; Sarah M Murray; Ellen M H Mitchell; Jura L Augustinavicius; Sara Causevic; Stefan D Baral Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Wim H van Brakel; Janine Cataldo; Sandeep Grover; Brandon A Kohrt; Laura Nyblade; Melissa Stockton; Edwin Wouters; Lawrence H Yang Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Anne L Stangl; Pamela Lilleston; Hlengani Mathema; Triantafyllos Pliakas; Shari Krishnaratne; Kirsty Sievwright; Nomhle Bell-Mandla; Redwaan Vermaak; Tila Mainga; Mara Steinhaus; Deborah Donnell; Ab Schaap; Peter Bock; Helen Ayles; Richard Hayes; Graeme Hoddinott; Virginia Bond; James R Hargreaves Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Kristina L Bajema; Rachel W Kubiak; Brandon L Guthrie; Susan M Graham; Sabina Govere; Hilary Thulare; Mahomed-Yunus Moosa; Connie Celum; Paul K Drain Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Antonio Baldassarre; Gabriele Giorgi; Federico Alessio; Lucrezia Ginevra Lulli; Giulio Arcangeli; Nicola Mucci Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 3.390