Literature DB >> 27118766

Methods to improve patient recruitment and retention in stroke trials.

Eivind Berge1, Christian Stapf2, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman3, Gary A Ford4, Peter Sandercock3, H Bart van der Worp5, Jesper Petersson6, Diederik Wj Dippel7, Derk W Krieger8, Kennedy R Lees9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The success of randomized-controlled stroke trials is dependent on the recruitment and retention of a sufficient number of patients, but fewer than half of all trials meet their target number of patients.
METHODS: We performed a search and review of the literature, and conducted a survey and workshop among 56 European stroke trialists, to identify barriers, suggest methods to improve recruitment and retention, and make a priority list of interventions that merit further evaluation.
RESULTS: The survey and workshop identified a number of barriers to patient recruitment and retention, from patients' incapacity to consent, to handicaps that prevent patients from participation in trial-specific follow-up. Methods to improve recruitment and retention may include simple interventions with individual participants, funding of research networks, and reimbursement of new treatments by health services only when delivered within clinical trials. The literature review revealed that few methods have been formally evaluated. The top five priorities for evaluation identified in the workshop were as follows: short and illustrated patient information leaflets, nonwritten consent, reimbursement for new interventions only within a study, and monetary incentives to institutions taking part in research (for recruitment); and involvement of patient groups, remote and central follow-up, use of mobile devices, and reminders to patients about their consent to participate (for retention).
CONCLUSIONS: Many interventions have been used with the aim of improving recruitment and retention of patients in stroke studies, but only a minority has been evaluated. We have identified methods that could be tested, and propose that such evaluations may be nested within on-going clinical trials.
© 2016 World Stroke Organization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; acute stroke therapy; clinical trial; methodological research; prevention; recruitment; rehabilitation; retention; stroke trial; studies within a trial

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27118766     DOI: 10.1177/1747493016641963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  9 in total

1.  Distance from Home to Research Center: A Barrier to In-Person Visits but Not Treatment Adherence in a Stroke Trial.

Authors:  Enrique C Leira; Catherine M Viscoli; Linnea A Polgreen; Mark Gorman; Walter N Kernan
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Recruitment challenges in stroke neurorecovery clinical trials.

Authors:  Isadora Santos Ferreira; Camila Bonin Pinto; Faddi Ghassan Saleh Velez; Douglas Teixeira Leffa; Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-07-05

3.  High tech and high touch: Recruitment strategies for enrolling African American stroke survivors in Community Based Intervention under Nurse Guidance after stroke (CINGS) trial.

Authors:  Gayenell S Magwood; Charles Ellis; Joy N J Buie; Stephanie Slan; Leo Bonilha; Robert J Adams
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-09-08

4.  Stroke survivors' preferences regarding study participation in rehabilitation research.

Authors:  Emma Carlstedt; Eva Månsson Lexell; Agneta Ståhl; Arne Lindgren; Susanne Iwarsson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Functional standing frame programme early after severe sub-acute stroke (SPIRES): a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Authors:  Angela Logan; Jennifer Freeman; Bridie Kent; Jill Pooler; Siobhan Creanor; Doyo Enki; Jane Vickery; Andrew Barton; Jonathan Marsden
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-03-03

6.  Feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of Physical Activity Routines After Stroke (PARAS): a multifaceted behaviour change intervention targeting free-living physical activity and sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling adult stroke survivors.

Authors:  Sarah A Moore; Darren Flynn; Susan Jones; Christopher I M Price; Leah Avery
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-09-03

Review 7.  Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials to organise and map current literature.

Authors:  Anna Kearney; Nicola L Harman; Anna Rosala-Hallas; Claire Beecher; Jane M Blazeby; Peter Bower; Mike Clarke; William Cragg; Sinead Duane; Heidi Gardner; Patricia Healy; Lisa Maguire; Nicola Mills; Leila Rooshenas; Ceri Rowlands; Shaun Treweek; Akke Vellinga; Paula R Williamson; Carrol Gamble
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Identifying important barriers to recruitment of patients in randomised clinical studies using a questionnaire for study personnel.

Authors:  Eva Isaksson; Per Wester; Ann Charlotte Laska; Per Näsman; Erik Lundström
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Standing Practice In Rehabilitation Early after Stroke (SPIRES): a functional standing frame programme (prolonged standing and repeated sit to stand) to improve function and quality of life and reduce neuromuscular impairment in people with severe sub-acute stroke-a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Angie Logan; Jennifer Freeman; Bridie Kent; Jillian Pooler; Siobhan Creanor; Jane Vickery; Doyo Enki; Andrew Barton; Jonathan Marsden
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-03-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.